From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A3DB4C25B75 for ; Thu, 23 May 2024 18:36:49 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:References: Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=NzmrS7i46KSunm4A2SV+XusyvN44M+TG0O9hirIn2Ew=; b=Y/3QlHqq6wPMXN kR89MBir2lYes79QCHemYhYYCH/KD4FFxlg/j8anRQJQGNezJ6T8yIHTOWMIh6Daml5Fj3A2MFjC7 OK4LM7gHjhJcAuVMdo5CATThEczTxAznBMJAOSwRIItcE74U7Fp4V01akjNw+NUd8m9J10VNeePml h5IfhPMjZYu5EUJMBcVlB18WO9wwDfRWqbVxDhbEqR4dwnIm+Rvc02vSeZovgSnfKQ7yf+WHJ+wAt nGnrTn5Qxuktoq/xTAEMczjpCn8nG0MeT7g5eBFu7aQPjFwVev3RgfBwAYAlWdFKUcqAMcK3Wl6Ql HeEnigzwjt5FMsR0fjwg==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.97.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1sADIr-000000072Q2-3B1P; Thu, 23 May 2024 18:36:37 +0000 Received: from metis.whiteo.stw.pengutronix.de ([2a0a:edc0:2:b01:1d::104]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.97.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1sADIo-000000072MF-0IqR for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Thu, 23 May 2024 18:36:36 +0000 Received: from drehscheibe.grey.stw.pengutronix.de ([2a0a:edc0:0:c01:1d::a2]) by metis.whiteo.stw.pengutronix.de with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1sADIG-0005dy-Sc; Thu, 23 May 2024 20:36:00 +0200 Received: from [2a0a:edc0:2:b01:1d::c5] (helo=pty.whiteo.stw.pengutronix.de) by drehscheibe.grey.stw.pengutronix.de with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1sADIF-002hBH-U5; Thu, 23 May 2024 20:35:59 +0200 Received: from sha by pty.whiteo.stw.pengutronix.de with local (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1sADIF-009tpb-2g; Thu, 23 May 2024 20:35:59 +0200 Date: Thu, 23 May 2024 20:35:59 +0200 From: Sascha Hauer To: Pankaj Gupta Cc: Jonathan Corbet , Rob Herring , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Conor Dooley , Shawn Guo , Pengutronix Kernel Team , Fabio Estevam , Rob Herring , Krzysztof Kozlowski , "linux-doc@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "devicetree@vger.kernel.org" , "imx@lists.linux.dev" , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" Subject: Re: [EXT] Re: [PATCH v2 4/5] firmware: imx: add driver for NXP EdgeLock Enclave Message-ID: References: <20240523-imx-se-if-v2-0-5a6fd189a539@nxp.com> <20240523-imx-se-if-v2-4-5a6fd189a539@nxp.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Sent-From: Pengutronix Hildesheim X-URL: http://www.pengutronix.de/ X-Accept-Language: de,en X-Accept-Content-Type: text/plain X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 2a0a:edc0:0:c01:1d::a2 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: sha@pengutronix.de X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on metis.whiteo.stw.pengutronix.de); SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-PTX-Original-Recipient: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20240523_113634_151499_B3061BD2 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 34.81 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Thu, May 23, 2024 at 01:43:46PM +0000, Pankaj Gupta wrote: > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Sascha Hauer > > Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2024 6:54 PM > > To: Pankaj Gupta > > Cc: Jonathan Corbet ; Rob Herring ; > > Krzysztof Kozlowski ; Conor Dooley > > ; Shawn Guo ; Pengutronix > > Kernel Team ; Fabio Estevam > > ; Rob Herring ; Krzysztof Kozlowski > > ; linux-doc@vger.kernel.org; linux- > > kernel@vger.kernel.org; devicetree@vger.kernel.org; imx@lists.linux.dev; > > linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org > > Subject: [EXT] Re: [PATCH v2 4/5] firmware: imx: add driver for NXP EdgeLock > > Enclave > > > > Caution: This is an external email. Please take care when clicking links or > > opening attachments. When in doubt, report the message using the 'Report > > this email' button > > > > > > On Thu, May 23, 2024 at 04:19:35PM +0530, Pankaj Gupta wrote: > > > NXP hardware IP(s) for secure-enclaves like Edgelock Enclave(ELE), are > > > embedded in the SoC to support the features like HSM, SHE & V2X, using > > > message based communication interface. > > > > > > The secure enclave FW communicates on a dedicated messaging unit(MU) > > > based interface(s) with application core, where kernel is running. > > > It exists on specific i.MX processors. e.g. i.MX8ULP, i.MX93. > > > > > > This patch adds the driver for communication interface to > > > secure-enclave, for exchanging messages with NXP secure enclave HW > > > IP(s) like EdgeLock Enclave (ELE) from Kernel-space, used by kernel > > > management layers like > > > - DM-Crypt. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Pankaj Gupta > > > --- > > > drivers/firmware/imx/Kconfig | 12 + > > > drivers/firmware/imx/Makefile | 2 + > > > drivers/firmware/imx/ele_base_msg.c | 286 +++++++++++++++++++ > > > drivers/firmware/imx/ele_base_msg.h | 92 +++++++ > > > drivers/firmware/imx/ele_common.c | 239 ++++++++++++++++ > > > drivers/firmware/imx/ele_common.h | 43 +++ > > > drivers/firmware/imx/se_ctrl.c | 531 > > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > > drivers/firmware/imx/se_ctrl.h | 99 +++++++ > > > include/linux/firmware/imx/se_api.h | 14 + > > > 9 files changed, 1318 insertions(+) > > > > [...] > > > > > > > > +int imx_ele_msg_send(struct se_if_priv *priv, void *tx_msg) { > > > + struct se_msg_hdr *header; > > > + int err; > > > + > > > + header = (struct se_msg_hdr *) tx_msg; > > > + > > > + if (header->tag == priv->cmd_tag) > > > + lockdep_assert_held(&priv->se_if_cmd_lock); > > > + > > > + scoped_guard(mutex, &priv->se_if_lock); > > > > scoped_guard() with an empty block doesn't make much sense. Either use > > scope_guard() { /* do something locked */ }; or guard(). > > > Need to allow send more than one message at a time. Hence, done it after taking the lock. > Once message sent, scope of lock is over. You take the lock and release it immediately afterwards. There's nothing locked with this. Please have a look how scoped_guard() works. Sascha -- Pengutronix e.K. | | Steuerwalder Str. 21 | http://www.pengutronix.de/ | 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 | Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 | _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel