From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EF069C25B74 for ; Thu, 16 May 2024 10:41:48 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:References: Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=lbSacsDgSdvTZmRWRtWgrXgCuL9PPXxiFG+Sh4Rxxzg=; b=LuedChVP8RAyq6 Vv4l5v7bLPlApwweil2LgcbNx7a/aDa32rzGkRwRoXFl8eMY7tz0Z6nFhuYdr0EzhVfb9EVAKcYUI 4e1KHvvz3YV116Gs4jfR0J7muTCS5V3xARzVJ/Cn3CAhLFhhTG9IEuNS7WdAc+5/o8P4OGamF1q3y eWxfHSjjGarBFQ4vTtETjVPa57Cxw+nhuWulOZHGDTezVkFh0IsbcAu/WW4kjIYkuKlQG0RGEh30X eWqYHRds00a3ItqS6gHwgKxKsDq4SEeGEPRHN+yNo1Lgf+Zs+hlJBMDbqUipNWHZKCNXlcz6qixWm C1EdrNwo8drcGZExhEwQ==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.97.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1s7YYM-00000004Vav-3PB9; Thu, 16 May 2024 10:41:38 +0000 Received: from foss.arm.com ([217.140.110.172]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.97.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1s7YYJ-00000004VZt-1lou for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Thu, 16 May 2024 10:41:38 +0000 Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2FB51DA7; Thu, 16 May 2024 03:41:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: from bogus (e103737-lin.cambridge.arm.com [10.1.197.49]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 9ED253F762; Thu, 16 May 2024 03:41:30 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 16 May 2024 11:41:28 +0100 From: Sudeep Holla To: Jean-Philippe Brucker Cc: Bjorn Helgaas , Vidya Sagar , "will@kernel.org" , "lpieralisi@kernel.org" , "kw@linux.com" , "robh@kernel.org" , "bhelgaas@google.com" , "krzk+dt@kernel.org" , "conor+dt@kernel.org" , "liviu.dudau@arm.com" , "joro@8bytes.org" , "robin.murphy@arm.com" , Nicolin Chen , Ketan Patil , "linux-pci@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , "iommu@lists.linux.dev" , "devicetree@vger.kernel.org" Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] Enable PCIe ATS for devicetree boot Message-ID: References: <20240515185241.GA2131384@bhelgaas> <20240516073500.GA3563602@myrica> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20240516073500.GA3563602@myrica> X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20240516_034135_565342_AE6B5965 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 21.60 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Thu, May 16, 2024 at 08:35:00AM +0100, Jean-Philippe Brucker wrote: > Hi, > > On Wed, May 15, 2024 at 01:52:41PM -0500, Bjorn Helgaas wrote: > > On Wed, May 15, 2024 at 06:28:15PM +0000, Vidya Sagar wrote: > > > Thanks, Jean for this series. > > > May I know the current status of it? > > > Although it was actively reviewed, I see that its current status is set to > > > 'Handled Elsewhere' in https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-pci/list/?series=848836&state=* > > > What is the plan to get this series accepted? > > > > I probably marked it "handled elsewhere" in the PCI patchwork because > > it doesn't touch PCI files (the binding has already been reviewed by > > Rob and Liviu), so I assumed the iommu folks would take the series. > > I don't know how they track patches. > > Yes I think this can go through the IOMMU tree. Since patch 3 is still > missing an Ack, I'm resendng the series next cycle. > Extremely sorry for that, since I saw Liviu on the thread, I assumed he would have acked/reviewed 3/3 as well but now I see that is not the case. That said, you must not delay the change just for the DTS file changes. Anyways I will ack it now. -- Regards, Sudeep _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel