From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 336F4C25B78 for ; Tue, 4 Jun 2024 12:12:14 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:References: Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=gZeIWyODXF1lBdeN/KT863EOeLUYID6j6xTNzmzgWLA=; b=cWhwT4qhClHhV0 f/CvKlJzTiH0WxiIho1ty0+1p7tmEUYS7A2HOI9xdd4HNaMTKpf1Ai1s7NMrNrh/rJVRenmm5eRpz ZhCxbeM4VcYb8PvgV6Lzvz0tunLknsQ/Rybar014f0NeRaZnXUm1pAzVYdGyusrYzBTJ1cIJarA6S JKonRXJ9a8UWPoVfNHYQCEwiJqvRYNCnBP+lf7pl+Cle0F581mearPuIVr2gaxYDWek0XWzFWFxlS FIgGGtv3gbuvbQsjc21oRdFqmAvnQ4fySTUOanGwqdoxdDag5YLWneDwWwQkAM5LduQveWSPIE8kF QLz6dOwECnDQN5j1Pmxg==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.97.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1sET1G-00000002EhE-3ild; Tue, 04 Jun 2024 12:12:02 +0000 Received: from foss.arm.com ([217.140.110.172]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.97.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1sET1E-00000002Egl-1B2M for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Tue, 04 Jun 2024 12:12:01 +0000 Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 17F491042; Tue, 4 Jun 2024 05:12:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: from bogus (e103737-lin.cambridge.arm.com [10.1.197.49]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7D07B3F64C; Tue, 4 Jun 2024 05:11:56 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 4 Jun 2024 13:11:54 +0100 From: Sudeep Holla To: Peng Fan Cc: "Peng Fan (OSS)" , Cristian Marussi , Sudeep Holla , Rob Herring , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Conor Dooley , Shawn Guo , Sascha Hauer , Pengutronix Kernel Team , Fabio Estevam , Linus Walleij , Aisheng Dong , Jacky Bai , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , "devicetree@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "imx@lists.linux.dev" , "linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org" Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] pinctrl: scmi: support i.MX95 OEM extensions with fsl,pins property Message-ID: References: <20240521-pinctrl-scmi-imx95-v1-0-9a1175d735fd@nxp.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20240604_051200_389179_6BC30364 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 24.87 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Tue, Jun 04, 2024 at 12:49:13AM +0000, Peng Fan wrote: > Hi Sudeep, > > > Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] pinctrl: scmi: support i.MX95 OEM extensions with > > fsl,pins property > > > > On Mon, May 27, 2024 at 08:36:27AM +0000, Peng Fan wrote: > > > Hi Linus, Sudeep, Cristian, > > > > > > > Subject: [PATCH 0/3] pinctrl: scmi: support i.MX95 OEM extensions > > > > with fsl,pins property > > > > > > Sorry if this is an early ping to you. Just wanna this not blocking > > > i.MX95 upstream support. > > > > > > > I would say yes as this was posted bang in the middle of the merge window. > > So it is possible for people to miss this if they are busy otherwise. > > > > I wouldn't have responded in general or if someone is new to the Linux kernel > > development. But you are no new to kernel development. > > > > In general I also have a suggestion for you. Avoid churning the dependent > > patch series if the base set of patches are not yet reviewed or agreed upon. > > I was super confused with the amount of different concurrent but dependent > > patch series you had for this whole i.MX SCMI pinmux support. I had ignored > > and not responded in the past but thought it would be good to respond in > > this thread. > > Thanks for your suggestion. I tried to do different implementations that > could make all of us agree, so it was indeed many versions with different > implementations. Sorry. I will improve. > Thanks and sorry again if it is harsh but it was indeed confusing. > BTW: would you please also give an ACK for patch 3, because patch 3 uses > module_scmi_driver? Done. -- Regards, Sudeep _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel