From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 510CEC25B74 for ; Fri, 24 May 2024 19:14:05 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:References: Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=vGsgqhZQfjVvwj479FERLXcIzoW/iTd0KV4pUKM8LFQ=; b=XkH2olOs8okOaD TsDRtoyGKg4HtxGrPIZGsuftBSECVMy852DBg0sRQ46LZQjnkdR16aDdeqyUoyZ+ZE099iL7TfECv 6fyOIYUsx3VkaQaeIxEY/cB/6BOFNE4MZxKljeq74h8l0OpxPEpfkEHQSckQ8u5HTN7McZBtU/w/o XhBzPwbArR/QxzubMC+Nu+2X9VzG0CapyTbYgSNkYmN0lZ1maUEe9BKAs8isPddKswZrqD1wUYBF6 S3//xuO+zOiYgY5au2iVpeRFqDTXeveu6KVCFelLB3BoEJZegWvRe+MI1rPNYOqhxv8TeCTDckJl3 wHRawFpw7myIBkO4X3UQ==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.97.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1sAaMV-00000009g98-39H9; Fri, 24 May 2024 19:13:55 +0000 Received: from out-183.mta1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:203:375::b7]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.97.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1sAaMS-00000009g7D-1H7c for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Fri, 24 May 2024 19:13:53 +0000 X-Envelope-To: maz@kernel.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linux.dev; s=key1; t=1716578019; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=e4xsaOPA9gGcOVUExbmRnE5sLYdiYNTU9786Z4HVcqU=; b=s6eqr+MU60pWRFwhNU+4ZWkEJor1/+cwcaF8l4PLRDqBjk7nkjvaHWsWFSiDqnpeB7MqJf 6l1/nUfRWNViZ73VEibqQk4J+hKAXs1muec2S8sRvyGI5618GVieyp1iioGQVNX0d1v9e5 PNuXDHTmcC5MCsrJv6oaCQOAkIqp69Y= X-Envelope-To: t@linux.dev X-Envelope-To: kvmarm@lists.linux.dev X-Envelope-To: kvm@vger.kernel.org X-Envelope-To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Envelope-To: nsg@linux.ibm.com X-Envelope-To: james.morse@arm.com X-Envelope-To: suzuki.poulose@arm.com X-Envelope-To: yuzenghui@huawei.com Date: Fri, 24 May 2024 12:13:34 -0700 X-Report-Abuse: Please report any abuse attempt to abuse@migadu.com and include these headers. From: Oliver Upton To: Marc Zyngier , t@linux.dev Cc: kvmarm@lists.linux.dev, kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Nina Schoetterl-Glausch , James Morse , Suzuki K Poulose , Zenghui Yu Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] KVM/arm64 fixes for AArch32 handling Message-ID: References: <20240524141956.1450304-1-maz@kernel.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20240524141956.1450304-1-maz@kernel.org> X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_OUT X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20240524_121352_502241_C9F8ACE1 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 11.59 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Fri, May 24, 2024 at 03:19:53PM +0100, Marc Zyngier wrote: > The (very much unloved) AArch32 handling has recently been found > lacking in a number of ways: > > - Nina spotted a brown paper-bag quality bug in the register narrowing > code when writing one of the core registers (GPRs, PSTATE) from > userspace Yuck! > - We never allowed System mode to be restored. Nobody ever complained, > but this is wrong nonetheless > > - The handling of traps failing their condition check went from dodgy > to outright broken when the handling of ESR_EL2 was upgraded from 32 > to 64 bit (patch already posted). > > All these are stable material, and I plan to merge them after -rc1 > is released. Please do! Acked-by: Oliver Upton -- Thanks, Oliver _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel