From: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.com>
To: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Cc: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>,
Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>, Jia He <justin.he@arm.com>,
Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.ibm.com>,
linuxarm@huawei.com, catalin.marinas@arm.com,
Anshuman.Khandual@arm.com,
Yuquan Wang <wangyuquan1236@phytium.com.cn>,
Lorenzo Pieralisi <lpieralisi@kernel.org>,
James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 8/8] HACK: mm: memory_hotplug: Drop memblock_phys_free() call in try_remove_memory()
Date: Thu, 30 May 2024 12:07:37 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZlhP6aMUOjx_EziA@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240529171236.32002-9-Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
On Wed, May 29, 2024 at 06:12:36PM +0100, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
> I'm not sure what this is balancing, but it if is necessary then the reserved
> memblock approach can't be used to stash NUMA node assignments as after the
> first add / remove cycle the entry is dropped so not available if memory is
> re-added at the same HPA.
It is balancing previously allocated memory which was allocated via
memblock_phys_alloc{_range,try_nid}.
memblock_phys_alloc_try_nid() is who does the heavy-lifting, and also calls
kmemleak_alloc_phys() to make kmemleak aware of that memory.
A quick idea that came to me is:
I think that it should be possible 1) create a new memory_block flag
(check 'enum memblock_flags') and 2) flag the range you want with this
range (check memblock_setclr_flag()) with a function like
memblock_reserved_mark_{yourflag}.
Then, in memblock_phys_free() (or down the path) we could check for that flag,
and refuse to proceed if it is set.
Would that work?
I am not sure, but you might need to
--
Oscar Salvador
SUSE Labs
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-05-30 10:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-05-29 17:12 [RFC PATCH 0/8] arm64/memblock: Handling of CXL Fixed Memory Windows Jonathan Cameron
2024-05-29 17:12 ` [RFC PATCH 1/8] arm64: numa: Introduce a memory_add_physaddr_to_nid() Jonathan Cameron
2024-08-01 7:50 ` Yuquan Wang
2024-05-29 17:12 ` [RFC PATCH 2/8] arm64: memblock: Introduce a generic phys_addr_to_target_node() Jonathan Cameron
2024-08-01 7:52 ` Yuquan Wang
2024-05-29 17:12 ` [RFC PATCH 3/8] mm: memblock: Add a means to add to memblock.reserved Jonathan Cameron
2024-08-01 7:53 ` Yuquan Wang
2024-05-29 17:12 ` [RFC PATCH 4/8] arch_numa: Avoid onlining empty NUMA nodes Jonathan Cameron
2024-08-01 7:53 ` Yuquan Wang
2024-05-29 17:12 ` [RFC PATCH 5/8] arch_numa: Make numa_add_memblk() set nid for memblock.reserved regions Jonathan Cameron
2024-08-01 7:54 ` Yuquan Wang
2024-05-29 17:12 ` [RFC PATCH 6/8] arm64: mm: numa_fill_memblks() to add a memblock.reserved region if match Jonathan Cameron
2024-08-01 7:54 ` Yuquan Wang
2024-05-29 17:12 ` [RFC PATCH 7/8] acpi: srat: cxl: Skip zero length CXL fixed memory windows Jonathan Cameron
2024-08-01 7:55 ` Yuquan Wang
2024-05-29 17:12 ` [RFC PATCH 8/8] HACK: mm: memory_hotplug: Drop memblock_phys_free() call in try_remove_memory() Jonathan Cameron
2024-05-30 10:07 ` Oscar Salvador [this message]
2024-05-30 12:14 ` Jonathan Cameron
2024-05-31 7:49 ` David Hildenbrand
2024-05-31 9:48 ` Jonathan Cameron
2024-05-31 9:55 ` David Hildenbrand
2024-06-06 15:44 ` Mike Rapoport
2024-06-03 7:57 ` Mike Rapoport
2024-06-03 9:14 ` David Hildenbrand
2024-06-03 10:43 ` Mike Rapoport
2024-06-03 20:53 ` David Hildenbrand
2024-06-04 9:35 ` Mike Rapoport
2024-06-04 9:39 ` David Hildenbrand
2024-06-05 8:00 ` Mike Rapoport
2024-06-05 8:23 ` David Hildenbrand
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZlhP6aMUOjx_EziA@localhost.localdomain \
--to=osalvador@suse.com \
--cc=Anshuman.Khandual@arm.com \
--cc=Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=james.morse@arm.com \
--cc=justin.he@arm.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxarm@huawei.com \
--cc=lpieralisi@kernel.org \
--cc=rppt@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=sudeep.holla@arm.com \
--cc=wangyuquan1236@phytium.com.cn \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).