From: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
To: "Rob Herring (Arm)" <robh@kernel.org>
Cc: Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>, Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>,
Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>, Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>,
Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@linux.dev>,
James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>,
Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
Zenghui Yu <yuzenghui@huawei.com>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org,
kvmarm@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/9] perf: arm_v6/7_pmu: Drop non-DT probe support
Date: Mon, 10 Jun 2024 10:30:13 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZmbHpTXlSP4T0JqI@J2N7QTR9R3> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240607-arm-pmu-3-9-icntr-v1-2-c7bd2dceff3b@kernel.org>
On Fri, Jun 07, 2024 at 02:31:27PM -0600, Rob Herring (Arm) wrote:
> There are no non-DT based PMU users for v6 or v7, so drop the custom
> non-DT probe table.
>
> Note that this drops support for arm1156 PMU, but there are no arm1156
> based systems supported in the kernel.
>
> Signed-off-by: Rob Herring (Arm) <robh@kernel.org>
It might be worth adding an explciit note that xscale still has non-DT
support, and hence we need to retain the infrastructure for that.
Regardless:
Acked-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Mark.
> ---
> drivers/perf/arm_v6_pmu.c | 17 +----------------
> drivers/perf/arm_v7_pmu.c | 10 +---------
> 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/perf/arm_v6_pmu.c b/drivers/perf/arm_v6_pmu.c
> index f7593843bb85..0bb685b4bac5 100644
> --- a/drivers/perf/arm_v6_pmu.c
> +++ b/drivers/perf/arm_v6_pmu.c
> @@ -401,13 +401,6 @@ static int armv6_1136_pmu_init(struct arm_pmu *cpu_pmu)
> return 0;
> }
>
> -static int armv6_1156_pmu_init(struct arm_pmu *cpu_pmu)
> -{
> - armv6pmu_init(cpu_pmu);
> - cpu_pmu->name = "armv6_1156";
> - return 0;
> -}
> -
> static int armv6_1176_pmu_init(struct arm_pmu *cpu_pmu)
> {
> armv6pmu_init(cpu_pmu);
> @@ -421,17 +414,9 @@ static const struct of_device_id armv6_pmu_of_device_ids[] = {
> { /* sentinel value */ }
> };
>
> -static const struct pmu_probe_info armv6_pmu_probe_table[] = {
> - ARM_PMU_PROBE(ARM_CPU_PART_ARM1136, armv6_1136_pmu_init),
> - ARM_PMU_PROBE(ARM_CPU_PART_ARM1156, armv6_1156_pmu_init),
> - ARM_PMU_PROBE(ARM_CPU_PART_ARM1176, armv6_1176_pmu_init),
> - { /* sentinel value */ }
> -};
> -
> static int armv6_pmu_device_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> {
> - return arm_pmu_device_probe(pdev, armv6_pmu_of_device_ids,
> - armv6_pmu_probe_table);
> + return arm_pmu_device_probe(pdev, armv6_pmu_of_device_ids, NULL);
> }
>
> static struct platform_driver armv6_pmu_driver = {
> diff --git a/drivers/perf/arm_v7_pmu.c b/drivers/perf/arm_v7_pmu.c
> index fdd936fbd188..928ac3d626ed 100644
> --- a/drivers/perf/arm_v7_pmu.c
> +++ b/drivers/perf/arm_v7_pmu.c
> @@ -1977,17 +1977,9 @@ static const struct of_device_id armv7_pmu_of_device_ids[] = {
> {},
> };
>
> -static const struct pmu_probe_info armv7_pmu_probe_table[] = {
> - ARM_PMU_PROBE(ARM_CPU_PART_CORTEX_A8, armv7_a8_pmu_init),
> - ARM_PMU_PROBE(ARM_CPU_PART_CORTEX_A9, armv7_a9_pmu_init),
> - { /* sentinel value */ }
> -};
> -
> -
> static int armv7_pmu_device_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> {
> - return arm_pmu_device_probe(pdev, armv7_pmu_of_device_ids,
> - armv7_pmu_probe_table);
> + return arm_pmu_device_probe(pdev, armv7_pmu_of_device_ids, NULL);
> }
>
> static struct platform_driver armv7_pmu_driver = {
>
> --
> 2.43.0
>
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-06-10 9:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-06-07 20:31 [PATCH 0/9] arm64: Add support for Armv9.4 PMU fixed instruction counter Rob Herring (Arm)
2024-06-07 20:31 ` [PATCH 1/9] perf/arm: Move 32-bit PMU drivers to drivers/perf/ Rob Herring (Arm)
2024-06-10 9:23 ` Mark Rutland
2024-06-07 20:31 ` [PATCH 2/9] perf: arm_v6/7_pmu: Drop non-DT probe support Rob Herring (Arm)
2024-06-10 9:30 ` Mark Rutland [this message]
2024-06-07 20:31 ` [PATCH 3/9] perf: arm_pmu: Remove event index to counter remapping Rob Herring (Arm)
2024-06-08 19:37 ` kernel test robot
2024-06-10 10:44 ` Mark Rutland
2024-06-10 16:42 ` Rob Herring
2024-06-07 20:31 ` [PATCH 4/9] perf: arm_pmuv3: Prepare for more than 32 counters Rob Herring (Arm)
2024-06-10 10:51 ` Mark Rutland
2024-06-07 20:31 ` [PATCH 5/9] KVM: arm64: pmu: Use arm_pmuv3.h register accessors Rob Herring (Arm)
2024-06-10 11:02 ` Mark Rutland
2024-06-07 20:31 ` [PATCH 6/9] KVM: arm64: pmu: Use generated define for PMSELR_EL0.SEL access Rob Herring (Arm)
2024-06-10 11:10 ` Mark Rutland
2024-06-07 20:31 ` [PATCH 7/9] arm64: perf/kvm: Use a common PMU cycle counter define Rob Herring (Arm)
2024-06-10 11:24 ` Mark Rutland
2024-06-07 20:31 ` [PATCH 8/9] KVM: arm64: Refine PMU defines for number of counters Rob Herring (Arm)
2024-06-10 11:27 ` Mark Rutland
2024-06-07 20:31 ` [PATCH 9/9] perf: arm_pmuv3: Add support for Armv9.4 PMU instruction counter Rob Herring (Arm)
2024-06-10 11:55 ` Mark Rutland
2024-06-10 14:15 ` Rob Herring
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZmbHpTXlSP4T0JqI@J2N7QTR9R3 \
--to=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
--cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=irogers@google.com \
--cc=james.morse@arm.com \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=kvmarm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=oliver.upton@linux.dev \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=yuzenghui@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox