From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
To: Yang Shi <yang@os.amperecomputing.com>
Cc: will@kernel.org, anshuman.khandual@arm.com, david@redhat.com,
scott@os.amperecomputing.com, cl@gentwo.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [v5 PATCH] arm64: mm: force write fault for atomic RMW instructions
Date: Fri, 28 Jun 2024 17:54:54 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Zn7q3oL1AE8jdM-g@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240626191830.3819324-1-yang@os.amperecomputing.com>
On Wed, Jun 26, 2024 at 12:18:30PM -0700, Yang Shi wrote:
> @@ -568,6 +596,12 @@ static int __kprobes do_page_fault(unsigned long far, unsigned long esr,
> if (!vma)
> goto lock_mmap;
>
> + if ((vm_flags & VM_READ) && (vma->vm_flags & VM_WRITE) &&
> + is_el0_atomic_instr(regs)) {
> + vm_flags = VM_WRITE;
> + mm_flags |= FAULT_FLAG_WRITE;
> + }
The patch looks fine now and AFAICT there's no ABI change.
However, before deciding whether to merge this patch, I'd like to
understand why OpenJDK cannot use madvise(MADV_POPULATE_WRITE). This
would be the portable (Linux) solution that works better on
architectures without such atomic instructions (e.g. arm64 without LSE
atomics). So fixing user-space would be my preferred solution.
(I poked some people in Arm working in the area, hopefully I'll get some
more information)
--
Catalin
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-06-28 16:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-06-26 19:18 [v5 PATCH] arm64: mm: force write fault for atomic RMW instructions Yang Shi
2024-06-28 16:54 ` Catalin Marinas [this message]
2024-06-28 16:57 ` Christoph Lameter (Ampere)
2024-06-28 17:24 ` Catalin Marinas
2024-06-28 18:20 ` Yang Shi
2024-07-01 19:43 ` Catalin Marinas
2024-07-02 10:26 ` Ryan Roberts
2024-07-02 11:22 ` David Hildenbrand
2024-07-02 12:36 ` Ryan Roberts
2024-07-02 12:58 ` David Hildenbrand
2024-07-02 13:26 ` Ryan Roberts
2024-07-02 13:50 ` David Hildenbrand
2024-07-02 14:51 ` Ryan Roberts
2024-07-15 13:09 ` Ryan Roberts
2024-07-02 22:21 ` Yang Shi
2024-07-04 10:03 ` Catalin Marinas
2024-07-05 17:05 ` Christoph Lameter (Ampere)
2024-07-05 18:24 ` Catalin Marinas
2024-07-05 18:51 ` Christoph Lameter (Ampere)
2024-07-06 9:47 ` Catalin Marinas
2024-07-09 17:56 ` Yang Shi
2024-07-09 18:35 ` Catalin Marinas
2024-07-09 22:29 ` Yang Shi
2024-07-10 9:22 ` Catalin Marinas
2024-07-10 18:43 ` Yang Shi
2024-07-11 17:43 ` Catalin Marinas
2024-07-11 18:17 ` Yang Shi
2024-08-13 17:09 ` Yang Shi
2024-08-21 10:18 ` Catalin Marinas
2024-08-21 11:32 ` Dev Jain
2024-08-23 9:59 ` Will Deacon
2024-06-28 18:26 ` Christoph Lameter (Ampere)
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Zn7q3oL1AE8jdM-g@arm.com \
--to=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=anshuman.khandual@arm.com \
--cc=cl@gentwo.org \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=scott@os.amperecomputing.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=yang@os.amperecomputing.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).