From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8761FC27C53 for ; Thu, 20 Jun 2024 02:39:35 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender:List-Subscribe:List-Help :List-Post:List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:Content-Type: MIME-Version:References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=WKuJZMj6MVNvNRGmtfO5Qy0tFwpZxPHNN/MdwiMZdgA=; b=cLw6vYa5fhUczBGX9/tQhGwXo7 NSgEZxJF/XNgYZcLlNh8EruPxXFIEdZzU999DebuKecQmojgxSxFq3Q0gEcmPMhlhbWBNCslUa9Eu 9NLqmly46gqO5tOINrL8mRzj7ykv6UiUVrET7dyd5GQ0yqquDvnDQwo6jNysvTd4ibDBXj2JrETdz bpSPU1bB2yCXJW1jgA1yDNaYzgdaVscIAqO41+CUkViKMSlINpzHKTSTTFtzfqmORo/n14n0qrs0Q hMOj0z8S+8f+dV3zvSQ1Lu9/ZrDQqVImdTE7ZxCBRuLRitBe8SQKcxnpo8s9cA+dxCpPh6qEtOb8+ 7gRuAGGg==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.97.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1sK7hn-00000003Nay-2q22; Thu, 20 Jun 2024 02:39:19 +0000 Received: from mail-177131.yeah.net ([123.58.177.131]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.97.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1sK7hj-00000003NYp-21gU for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Thu, 20 Jun 2024 02:39:17 +0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yeah.net; s=s110527; h=Date:From:Subject:Message-ID:MIME-Version: Content-Type; bh=WKuJZMj6MVNvNRGmtfO5Qy0tFwpZxPHNN/MdwiMZdgA=; b=gYoFCL+0HV/bPiZs6DMu3ycbip7CiY84THM2GLuVJ1yVSoW1P+ZJrjNHkGrQH1 gEYCiwbjsW2kTTNzzMIEFoYLH+utdMzF5lVLAa1CjGSKhLtxVsZbiGwmWfctuMjR nm2jgf56AHhRZt7VnHfkyjSX0RawvQ6OdJc6chrMYJPbg= Received: from dragon (unknown [114.216.76.201]) by smtp1 (Coremail) with SMTP id ClUQrAD3X085lnNm7j5CCA--.18031S3; Thu, 20 Jun 2024 10:38:51 +0800 (CST) Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2024 10:38:48 +0800 From: Shawn Guo To: Marek Vasut Cc: kernel test robot , oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Shawn Guo Subject: Re: [shawnguo:imx/dt64 27/42] arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx8mp-dhcom-pdk2.dtb: hdmi@32fd8000: Unevaluated properties are not allowed ('ddc-i2c-bus' was unexpected) Message-ID: References: <202406171104.SmweUTX3-lkp@intel.com> <70b097d9-f859-4f57-91d2-4053ed9b1717@denx.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <70b097d9-f859-4f57-91d2-4053ed9b1717@denx.de> X-CM-TRANSID: ClUQrAD3X085lnNm7j5CCA--.18031S3 X-Coremail-Antispam: 1Uf129KBjDUn29KB7ZKAUJUUUU8529EdanIXcx71UUUUU7v73 VFW2AGmfu7bjvjm3AaLaJ3UbIYCTnIWIevJa73UjIFyTuYvjxU7BMKDUUUU X-Originating-IP: [114.216.76.201] X-CM-SenderInfo: pvkd40hjxrjqh1hdxhhqhw/1tbiER4EZWZv-bO+2QAAsO X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20240619_193915_860569_9177F0DB X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 12.32 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Mon, Jun 17, 2024 at 06:41:26AM +0200, Marek Vasut wrote: > On 6/17/24 5:20 AM, Shawn Guo wrote: > > Hi Marek, > > Hi, > > > Should I drop the patch or is it bindings that need to be updated? > > It is this bindings patch that fixes the warning: > > [PATCH v2] dt-bindings: display: synopsys,dw-hdmi: Document ddc-i2c-bus in > core > > https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/devicetree-bindings/patch/20240515062753.111746-1-marex@denx.de/ > > No need to drop this patch. > > I can pull the bindings patch in via drm-misc in parallel , is that OK with > you ? OK, I'm good as long as we are addressing it. Thanks! Shawn