From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3292AC27C4F for ; Fri, 21 Jun 2024 17:26:55 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender:List-Subscribe:List-Help :List-Post:List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:Content-Type: MIME-Version:References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=F3xrtOf+FxdU1P7Hs3XUZJBIy8dyW3/4k2Cla/dbf/g=; b=upbz33DvHIo13ogsV6w9J7FdLH FmDqEqNexWjSZZXW5KbAojpziJRCmxdpY6h1rY93zodfRkWG32LFV3BdfIxD2smzXqjWZVuovIL7j e+fz9lp6UdcBiyNnx3FUa00ZPwgdLwgi4DgQQEkX0KsO7szCDikPyRNZYpLyvfC/RjAef41cjL07t bamzMWqF+tJU2RDdmsOZQNwgKvahk+XSCG3ztjYj2l0/frJLG+rM0eeFKqxjoF3MmYzut0ZTwUUhp 5aKd70JJnf9R2Y7mk/UlbdC8BNhcYdCg16OMsVy/bKOgOesUe1r5tqV97TTNsCU70w6KX3fCvBfH1 Ue/qjPhw==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.97.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1sKi28-0000000A6UR-0gR3; Fri, 21 Jun 2024 17:26:44 +0000 Received: from sin.source.kernel.org ([2604:1380:40e1:4800::1]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.97.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1sKi23-0000000A6Tl-0sTm for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Fri, 21 Jun 2024 17:26:41 +0000 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (transwarp.subspace.kernel.org [100.75.92.58]) by sin.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C0A32CE2FBA; Fri, 21 Jun 2024 17:26:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A0C6FC2BBFC; Fri, 21 Jun 2024 17:26:34 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 21 Jun 2024 18:26:32 +0100 From: Catalin Marinas To: Thomas Gleixner , Mark Rutland Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Will Deacon , alexandru.elisei@arm.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, maz@kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/5] arm64: irqchip/gic-v3: Use compiletime constant PMR values Message-ID: References: <20240617111841.2529370-1-mark.rutland@arm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20240617111841.2529370-1-mark.rutland@arm.com> X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20240621_102639_524661_97092921 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 12.99 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org Hi Thomas, On Mon, Jun 17, 2024 at 12:18:36PM +0100, Mark Rutland wrote: > Mark Rutland (5): > wordpart.h: Add REPEAT_BYTE_U32() > irqchip/gic-common: Remove sync_access callback > irqchip/gic-v3: Make distributor priorities variables > irqchip/gic-v3: Detect GICD_CTRL.DS and SCR_EL3.FIQ earlier > arm64: irqchip/gic-v3: Select priorities at boot time > > arch/arm64/include/asm/arch_gicv3.h | 15 -- > arch/arm64/include/asm/ptrace.h | 35 +--- > arch/arm64/kernel/image-vars.h | 5 - > drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-common.c | 22 +-- > drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-common.h | 7 +- > drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3-its.c | 11 +- > drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3.c | 225 ++++++++++++------------ > drivers/irqchip/irq-gic.c | 10 +- > drivers/irqchip/irq-hip04.c | 6 +- > include/linux/irqchip/arm-gic-common.h | 4 - > include/linux/irqchip/arm-gic-v3-prio.h | 52 ++++++ > include/linux/irqchip/arm-gic-v3.h | 2 +- > include/linux/wordpart.h | 8 + > 13 files changed, 201 insertions(+), 201 deletions(-) > create mode 100644 include/linux/irqchip/arm-gic-v3-prio.h Are you ok for these patches to go through the arm64 tree (I can put them on a stable branch) or you'd rather get them through the irqchip tree? Either way, I don't expect (major) conflicts with the arm64 tree. Thanks. -- Catalin