RE: [shawnguo:imx/dt64 53/91] arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx95-19x19-evk.dtb: /: failed to match any schema with compatible: ['fsl,imx95-19x19-evk', 'fsl,imx95']

RE: [shawnguo:imx/dt64 53/91] arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx95-19x19-evk.dtb: /: failed to match any schema with compatible: ['fsl,imx95-19x19-evk', 'fsl,imx95']

[Peng Fan]

> arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx95-19x19-evk.dtb: /: failed to
> match any schema with compatible: ['fsl,imx95-19x19-evk', 'fsl,imx95']
> 
> tree:
> https://eur01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2F
> git.kernel.org%2Fpub%2Fscm%2Flinux%2Fkernel%2Fgit%2Fshawnguo
> %2Flinux.git&data=05%7C02%7Cpeng.fan%40nxp.com%7Cb357bd5c9
> 74f474b850608dc9a5f17a1%7C686ea1d3bc2b4c6fa92cd99c5c30163
> 5%7C0%7C0%7C638554980420478185%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb
> 3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVC
> I6Mn0%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=zOJwK%2FqDLTt9ctRcSl1bU57U
> XrDbURwhjE%2B%2B4qJNkXg%3D&reserved=0 imx/dt64
> head:   9db27bc55bd8363570c5a259ff4dc77bd6a0b2cd
> commit: b8f771037e9e34f46bd6ef6a0ae568d2a782e6e1 [53/91]
> arm64: dts: freescale: add i.MX95 19x19 EVK minimal board dts
> config: arm64-randconfig-051-20240702
> compiler: clang version 19.0.0git
> (https://eur01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2
> Fgithub.com%2Fllvm%2Fllvm-
> project&data=05%7C02%7Cpeng.fan%40nxp.com%7Cb357bd5c974f47
> 4b850608dc9a5f17a1%7C686ea1d3bc2b4c6fa92cd99c5c301635%7C0
> %7C0%7C638554980420486624%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJ
> WIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0
> %3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=BFu0TQNSW3jPVSLoTlUU55qWNpdAY
> Ge7roisK0WUyzQ%3D&reserved=0
> 326ba38a991250a8587a399a260b0f7af2c9166a)
> dtschema version: 2024.6.dev3+g650bf2d
> reproduce (this is a W=1 build):
> 
> If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new
> version of the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
> | Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
> | Closes:
> |
> https://eur01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2F
> lore
> | .kernel.org%2Foe-kbuild-all%2F202407021405.ahrmTsPb-
> lkp%40intel.com%2F
> |
> &data=05%7C02%7Cpeng.fan%40nxp.com%7Cb357bd5c974f474b850
> 608dc9a5f17a1%
> |
> 7C686ea1d3bc2b4c6fa92cd99c5c301635%7C0%7C0%7C6385549804
> 20491489%7CUnkn
> |
> own%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJB
> TiI6Ik1haWwi
> |
> LCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=9VUZ0Vy4JPhjSp0y6Hmy
> 865YN8SyTMzBN%2F
> | gABuLu0xM%3D&reserved=0
> 
> dtcheck warnings: (new ones prefixed by >>)
> >> arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx95-19x19-evk.dtb: /: failed to
> match
> >> any schema with compatible: ['fsl,imx95-19x19-evk', 'fsl,imx95']
> >> arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx95-19x19-evk.dtb: /: failed to
> match
> >> any schema with compatible: ['fsl,imx95-19x19-evk', 'fsl,imx95']
>    arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx95-19x19-evk.dtb: scmi:
> protocol@19: Unevaluated properties are not allowed
> ('regusdhc2vmmcgrp', 'uart1grp', 'usdhc1-100mhzgrp', 'usdhc1-
> 200mhzgrp', 'usdhc1grp', 'usdhc2-100mhzgrp', 'usdhc2-200mhzgrp',
> 'usdhc2gpiogrp', 'usdhc2grp' were unexpected)

The binding is in Linus' pinctrl tree.

Regards,
Peng.


>    	from schema $id:
> https://eur01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fd
> evicetree.org%2Fschemas%2Ffirmware%2Farm%2Cscmi.yaml%23&dat
> a=05%7C02%7Cpeng.fan%40nxp.com%7Cb357bd5c974f474b850608d
> c9a5f17a1%7C686ea1d3bc2b4c6fa92cd99c5c301635%7C0%7C0%7C6
> 38554980420496327%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4w
> LjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C0%
> 7C%7C%7C&sdata=xCDo6NX%2FUZthtdsF8gT6Ue%2Bb4lJTLWJUW09c
> JNM7dn8%3D&reserved=0
> 
> --
> 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
> https://eur01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2F
> github.com%2Fintel%2Flkp-
> tests%2Fwiki&data=05%7C02%7Cpeng.fan%40nxp.com%7Cb357bd5c9
> 74f474b850608dc9a5f17a1%7C686ea1d3bc2b4c6fa92cd99c5c30163
> 5%7C0%7C0%7C638554980420501016%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb
> 3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVC
> I6Mn0%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=%2Bq2%2FudOW%2BlL9BLf1lWi
> qLwMfMU0G4F140X5ZfPtJ4zg%3D&reserved=0

Re: [shawnguo:imx/dt64 53/91] arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx95-19x19-evk.dtb: /: failed to match any schema with compatible: ['fsl,imx95-19x19-evk', 'fsl,imx95']

[Shawn Guo]

On Tue, Jul 02, 2024 at 06:22:26AM +0000, Peng Fan wrote:
> > dtcheck warnings: (new ones prefixed by >>)
> > >> arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx95-19x19-evk.dtb: /: failed to
> > match
> > >> any schema with compatible: ['fsl,imx95-19x19-evk', 'fsl,imx95']
> > >> arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx95-19x19-evk.dtb: /: failed to
> > match
> > >> any schema with compatible: ['fsl,imx95-19x19-evk', 'fsl,imx95']
> >    arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx95-19x19-evk.dtb: scmi:
> > protocol@19: Unevaluated properties are not allowed
> > ('regusdhc2vmmcgrp', 'uart1grp', 'usdhc1-100mhzgrp', 'usdhc1-
> > 200mhzgrp', 'usdhc1grp', 'usdhc2-100mhzgrp', 'usdhc2-200mhzgrp',
> > 'usdhc2gpiogrp', 'usdhc2grp' were unexpected)
> 
> The binding is in Linus' pinctrl tree.

Hi lkp forks,

Thanks for all those reports!  But could you stop such "make W=1 dtbs"
testing against my imx/dt64 (and imx/dt) branch but testing linux-next
instead?  Binding changes may go via different trees.

Shawn

Re: [shawnguo:imx/dt64 53/91] arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx95-19x19-evk.dtb: /: failed to match any schema with compatible: ['fsl,imx95-19x19-evk', 'fsl,imx95']

[Philip Li]

On Tue, Jul 02, 2024 at 02:50:38PM +0800, Shawn Guo wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 02, 2024 at 06:22:26AM +0000, Peng Fan wrote:
> > > dtcheck warnings: (new ones prefixed by >>)
> > > >> arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx95-19x19-evk.dtb: /: failed to
> > > match
> > > >> any schema with compatible: ['fsl,imx95-19x19-evk', 'fsl,imx95']
> > > >> arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx95-19x19-evk.dtb: /: failed to
> > > match
> > > >> any schema with compatible: ['fsl,imx95-19x19-evk', 'fsl,imx95']
> > >    arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx95-19x19-evk.dtb: scmi:
> > > protocol@19: Unevaluated properties are not allowed
> > > ('regusdhc2vmmcgrp', 'uart1grp', 'usdhc1-100mhzgrp', 'usdhc1-
> > > 200mhzgrp', 'usdhc1grp', 'usdhc2-100mhzgrp', 'usdhc2-200mhzgrp',
> > > 'usdhc2gpiogrp', 'usdhc2grp' were unexpected)
> > 
> > The binding is in Linus' pinctrl tree.
> 
> Hi lkp forks,
> 
> Thanks for all those reports!  But could you stop such "make W=1 dtbs"
> testing against my imx/dt64 (and imx/dt) branch but testing linux-next
> instead?  Binding changes may go via different trees.

Got it, these 2 branches will be ignored for dtbs testing. Sorry for
the noises.

> 
> Shawn
> 
>