linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Kousik Sanagavarapu <five231003@gmail.com>
To: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Cc: Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@inria.fr>, Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>,
	Santosh Shilimkar <ssantosh@kernel.org>,
	Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>,
	Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>,
	Javier Carrasco <javier.carrasco.cruz@gmail.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] soc: ti: pm33xx: do device_node auto cleanup
Date: Fri, 5 Jul 2024 16:41:20 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZofU2ABYrB9Q0ZyR@five231003> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240705115413.0000307d@Huawei.com>

Hi Jonathan,

On Fri, Jul 05, 2024 at 11:54:13AM +0100, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
> On Wed,  3 Jul 2024 12:25:28 +0530
> Kousik Sanagavarapu <five231003@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> > Use scope based cleanup instead of manual of_node_put() calls, hence
> > simplifying the handling of error paths.
> > 
> > Suggested-by: Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@inria.fr>
> > Signed-off-by: Kousik Sanagavarapu <five231003@gmail.com>
> I think you can make use of dev_err_probe() in here to
> further simplify things (a bit anyway!)

The changes proposed on all the patches make sense.  I'll send out v3
soon.

I hadn't caught the dev_err_probe() change in this patch ;) while
preparing this series.  I'll make the changes.

Thanks for the review


      reply	other threads:[~2024-07-05 11:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-07-03  6:55 [PATCH v2 0/3] Do device node auto cleanup in drivers/soc/ti/ Kousik Sanagavarapu
2024-07-03  6:55 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] soc: ti: pruss: do device_node auto cleanup Kousik Sanagavarapu
2024-07-05 10:49   ` Jonathan Cameron
2024-07-03  6:55 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] soc: ti: knav_qmss_queue: " Kousik Sanagavarapu
2024-07-05 10:52   ` Jonathan Cameron
2024-07-03  6:55 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] soc: ti: pm33xx: " Kousik Sanagavarapu
2024-07-05 10:54   ` Jonathan Cameron
2024-07-05 11:11     ` Kousik Sanagavarapu [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ZofU2ABYrB9Q0ZyR@five231003 \
    --to=five231003@gmail.com \
    --cc=Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com \
    --cc=javier.carrasco.cruz@gmail.com \
    --cc=julia.lawall@inria.fr \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nathan@kernel.org \
    --cc=nm@ti.com \
    --cc=skhan@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=ssantosh@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).