linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>
To: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@linux.ibm.com>,
	Andreas Larsson <andreas@gaisler.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>,
	Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
	Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
	David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>,
	Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@kernel.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	Jiaxun Yang <jiaxun.yang@flygoat.com>,
	John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <glaubitz@physik.fu-berlin.de>,
	Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
	Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
	Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>,
	Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@alpha.franken.de>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, loongarch@lists.linux.dev,
	linux-mips@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
	linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-sh@vger.kernel.org, sparclinux@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org,
	nvdimm@lists.linux.dev, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, x86@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/17] mm: introduce numa_memblks
Date: Mon, 22 Jul 2024 11:08:11 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Zp4Ta31U6amqIbI1@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240719143347.000077d9@huawei.com>

On Fri, Jul 19, 2024 at 02:33:47PM +0100, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
> On Tue, 16 Jul 2024 14:13:29 +0300
> Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org> wrote:
> 
> > From: "Mike Rapoport (Microsoft)" <rppt@kernel.org>
> > 
> > Hi,
> > 
> > Following the discussion about handling of CXL fixed memory windows on
> > arm64 [1] I decided to bite the bullet and move numa_memblks from x86 to
> > the generic code so they will be available on arm64/riscv and maybe on
> > loongarch sometime later.
> > 
> > While it could be possible to use memblock to describe CXL memory windows,
> > it currently lacks notion of unpopulated memory ranges and numa_memblks
> > does implement this.
> > 
> > Another reason to make numa_memblks generic is that both arch_numa (arm64
> > and riscv) and loongarch use trimmed copy of x86 code although there is no
> > fundamental reason why the same code cannot be used on all these platforms.
> > Having numa_memblks in mm/ will make it's interaction with ACPI and FDT
> > more consistent and I believe will reduce maintenance burden.
> > 
> > And with generic numa_memblks it is (almost) straightforward to enable NUMA
> > emulation on arm64 and riscv.
> > 
> > The first 5 commits in this series are cleanups that are not strictly
> > related to numa_memblks.
> > 
> > Commits 6-11 slightly reorder code in x86 to allow extracting numa_memblks
> > and NUMA emulation to the generic code.
> > 
> > Commits 12-14 actually move the code from arch/x86/ to mm/ and commit 15
> > does some aftermath cleanups.
> > 
> > Commit 16 switches arch_numa to numa_memblks.
> > 
> > Commit 17 enables usage of phys_to_target_node() and
> > memory_add_physaddr_to_nid() with numa_memblks.
> 
> Hi Mike,
> 
> I've lightly tested with emulated CXL + Generic Ports and Generic
> Initiators as well as more normal cpus and memory via qemu on arm64 and it's
> looking good.
> 
> From my earlier series, patch 4 is probably still needed to avoid
> presenting nodes with nothing in them at boot (but not if we hotplug
> memory then remove it again in which case they disappear)
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240529171236.32002-5-Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com/
> However that was broken/inconsistent before your rework so I can send that
> patch separately. 

I'd appreciate it :)
 
> Thanks for getting this sorted!  I should get time to do more extensive
> testing and review in next week or so.

Thanks, you may want to wait for v2, I'm planning to send it this week.
 
> Jonathan
> 
> > 
> > [1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240529171236.32002-1-Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com/
> > 
> > Mike Rapoport (Microsoft) (17):
> >   mm: move kernel/numa.c to mm/
> >   MIPS: sgi-ip27: make NODE_DATA() the same as on all other
> >     architectures
> >   MIPS: loongson64: rename __node_data to node_data
> >   arch, mm: move definition of node_data to generic code
> >   arch, mm: pull out allocation of NODE_DATA to generic code
> >   x86/numa: simplify numa_distance allocation
> >   x86/numa: move FAKE_NODE_* defines to numa_emu
> >   x86/numa_emu: simplify allocation of phys_dist
> >   x86/numa_emu: split __apicid_to_node update to a helper function
> >   x86/numa_emu: use a helper function to get MAX_DMA32_PFN
> >   x86/numa: numa_{add,remove}_cpu: make cpu parameter unsigned
> >   mm: introduce numa_memblks
> >   mm: move numa_distance and related code from x86 to numa_memblks
> >   mm: introduce numa_emulation
> >   mm: make numa_memblks more self-contained
> >   arch_numa: switch over to numa_memblks
> >   mm: make range-to-target_node lookup facility a part of numa_memblks
> > 
> >  arch/arm64/include/asm/Kbuild                 |   1 +
> >  arch/arm64/include/asm/mmzone.h               |  13 -
> >  arch/arm64/include/asm/topology.h             |   1 +
> >  arch/loongarch/include/asm/Kbuild             |   1 +
> >  arch/loongarch/include/asm/mmzone.h           |  16 -
> >  arch/loongarch/include/asm/topology.h         |   1 +
> >  arch/loongarch/kernel/numa.c                  |  21 -
> >  arch/mips/include/asm/mach-ip27/mmzone.h      |   1 -
> >  .../mips/include/asm/mach-loongson64/mmzone.h |   4 -
> >  arch/mips/loongson64/numa.c                   |  20 +-
> >  arch/mips/sgi-ip27/ip27-memory.c              |   2 +-
> >  arch/powerpc/include/asm/mmzone.h             |   6 -
> >  arch/powerpc/mm/numa.c                        |  26 +-
> >  arch/riscv/include/asm/Kbuild                 |   1 +
> >  arch/riscv/include/asm/mmzone.h               |  13 -
> >  arch/riscv/include/asm/topology.h             |   4 +
> >  arch/s390/include/asm/Kbuild                  |   1 +
> >  arch/s390/include/asm/mmzone.h                |  17 -
> >  arch/s390/kernel/numa.c                       |   3 -
> >  arch/sh/include/asm/mmzone.h                  |   3 -
> >  arch/sh/mm/init.c                             |   7 +-
> >  arch/sh/mm/numa.c                             |   3 -
> >  arch/sparc/include/asm/mmzone.h               |   4 -
> >  arch/sparc/mm/init_64.c                       |  11 +-
> >  arch/x86/Kconfig                              |   9 +-
> >  arch/x86/include/asm/Kbuild                   |   1 +
> >  arch/x86/include/asm/mmzone.h                 |   6 -
> >  arch/x86/include/asm/mmzone_32.h              |  17 -
> >  arch/x86/include/asm/mmzone_64.h              |  18 -
> >  arch/x86/include/asm/numa.h                   |  24 +-
> >  arch/x86/include/asm/sparsemem.h              |   9 -
> >  arch/x86/mm/Makefile                          |   1 -
> >  arch/x86/mm/amdtopology.c                     |   1 +
> >  arch/x86/mm/numa.c                            | 618 +-----------------
> >  arch/x86/mm/numa_internal.h                   |  24 -
> >  drivers/acpi/numa/srat.c                      |   1 +
> >  drivers/base/Kconfig                          |   1 +
> >  drivers/base/arch_numa.c                      | 223 ++-----
> >  drivers/cxl/Kconfig                           |   2 +-
> >  drivers/dax/Kconfig                           |   2 +-
> >  drivers/of/of_numa.c                          |   1 +
> >  include/asm-generic/mmzone.h                  |   5 +
> >  include/asm-generic/numa.h                    |   6 +-
> >  include/linux/numa.h                          |   5 +
> >  include/linux/numa_memblks.h                  |  58 ++
> >  kernel/Makefile                               |   1 -
> >  kernel/numa.c                                 |  26 -
> >  mm/Kconfig                                    |  11 +
> >  mm/Makefile                                   |   3 +
> >  mm/numa.c                                     |  57 ++
> >  {arch/x86/mm => mm}/numa_emulation.c          |  42 +-
> >  mm/numa_memblks.c                             | 565 ++++++++++++++++
> >  52 files changed, 847 insertions(+), 1070 deletions(-)
> >  delete mode 100644 arch/arm64/include/asm/mmzone.h
> >  delete mode 100644 arch/loongarch/include/asm/mmzone.h
> >  delete mode 100644 arch/riscv/include/asm/mmzone.h
> >  delete mode 100644 arch/s390/include/asm/mmzone.h
> >  delete mode 100644 arch/x86/include/asm/mmzone.h
> >  delete mode 100644 arch/x86/include/asm/mmzone_32.h
> >  delete mode 100644 arch/x86/include/asm/mmzone_64.h
> >  create mode 100644 include/asm-generic/mmzone.h
> >  create mode 100644 include/linux/numa_memblks.h
> >  delete mode 100644 kernel/numa.c
> >  create mode 100644 mm/numa.c
> >  rename {arch/x86/mm => mm}/numa_emulation.c (94%)
> >  create mode 100644 mm/numa_memblks.c
> > 
> > 
> > base-commit: 22a40d14b572deb80c0648557f4bd502d7e83826
> 

-- 
Sincerely yours,
Mike.


      reply	other threads:[~2024-07-22  8:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 60+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-07-16 11:13 [PATCH 00/17] mm: introduce numa_memblks Mike Rapoport
2024-07-16 11:13 ` [PATCH 01/17] mm: move kernel/numa.c to mm/ Mike Rapoport
2024-07-17 14:35   ` David Hildenbrand
2024-07-19 13:55   ` Jonathan Cameron
2024-07-16 11:13 ` [PATCH 02/17] MIPS: sgi-ip27: make NODE_DATA() the same as on all other architectures Mike Rapoport
2024-07-17 14:32   ` David Hildenbrand
2024-07-19 14:38     ` Jonathan Cameron
2024-07-22  7:34       ` Mike Rapoport
2024-07-16 11:13 ` [PATCH 03/17] MIPS: loongson64: rename __node_data to node_data Mike Rapoport
2024-07-16 13:07   ` Jiaxun Yang
2024-07-17 14:33   ` David Hildenbrand
2024-07-19 15:27   ` Jonathan Cameron
2024-07-16 11:13 ` [PATCH 04/17] arch, mm: move definition of node_data to generic code Mike Rapoport
2024-07-17 14:35   ` David Hildenbrand
2024-07-19 15:39   ` Jonathan Cameron
2024-07-23  0:15   ` Davidlohr Bueso
2024-07-16 11:13 ` [PATCH 05/17] arch, mm: pull out allocation of NODE_DATA " Mike Rapoport
2024-07-17 14:42   ` David Hildenbrand
2024-07-18  7:02     ` Mike Rapoport
2024-07-19 15:07       ` David Hildenbrand
2024-07-19 15:34         ` Mike Rapoport
2024-07-19 15:46           ` David Hildenbrand
2024-07-19 15:51         ` Jonathan Cameron
2024-07-19 16:07           ` David Hildenbrand
2024-07-20 10:24     ` Mike Rapoport
2024-07-19 16:11   ` Jonathan Cameron
2024-07-16 11:13 ` [PATCH 06/17] x86/numa: simplify numa_distance allocation Mike Rapoport
2024-07-19 16:28   ` Jonathan Cameron
2024-07-22  7:51     ` Mike Rapoport
2024-07-16 11:13 ` [PATCH 07/17] x86/numa: move FAKE_NODE_* defines to numa_emu Mike Rapoport
2024-07-19 16:30   ` Jonathan Cameron
2024-07-16 11:13 ` [PATCH 08/17] x86/numa_emu: simplify allocation of phys_dist Mike Rapoport
2024-07-19 16:38   ` Jonathan Cameron
2024-07-16 11:13 ` [PATCH 09/17] x86/numa_emu: split __apicid_to_node update to a helper function Mike Rapoport
2024-07-19 16:47   ` Jonathan Cameron
2024-07-16 11:13 ` [PATCH 10/17] x86/numa_emu: use a helper function to get MAX_DMA32_PFN Mike Rapoport
2024-07-19 16:50   ` Jonathan Cameron
2024-07-16 11:13 ` [PATCH 11/17] x86/numa: numa_{add,remove}_cpu: make cpu parameter unsigned Mike Rapoport
2024-07-19 16:57   ` Jonathan Cameron
2024-07-16 11:13 ` [PATCH 12/17] mm: introduce numa_memblks Mike Rapoport
2024-07-19 18:16   ` Jonathan Cameron
2024-07-22  8:03     ` Mike Rapoport
2024-07-16 11:13 ` [PATCH 13/17] mm: move numa_distance and related code from x86 to numa_memblks Mike Rapoport
2024-07-18 21:46   ` Samuel Holland
2024-07-19  5:55     ` Mike Rapoport
2024-07-19 17:48   ` Jonathan Cameron
2024-07-20 12:25     ` Mike Rapoport
2024-07-16 11:13 ` [PATCH 14/17] mm: introduce numa_emulation Mike Rapoport
2024-07-19 16:03   ` Zi Yan
2024-07-20 12:09     ` Mike Rapoport
2024-07-16 11:13 ` [PATCH 15/17] mm: make numa_memblks more self-contained Mike Rapoport
2024-07-19 18:07   ` Jonathan Cameron
2024-07-20 12:32     ` Mike Rapoport
2024-07-22  8:05     ` Mike Rapoport
2024-07-16 11:13 ` [PATCH 16/17] arch_numa: switch over to numa_memblks Mike Rapoport
2024-07-19 18:16   ` Jonathan Cameron
2024-07-16 11:13 ` [PATCH 17/17] mm: make range-to-target_node lookup facility a part of numa_memblks Mike Rapoport
2024-07-19 18:19   ` Jonathan Cameron
2024-07-19 13:33 ` [PATCH 00/17] mm: introduce numa_memblks Jonathan Cameron
2024-07-22  8:08   ` Mike Rapoport [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Zp4Ta31U6amqIbI1@kernel.org \
    --to=rppt@kernel.org \
    --cc=Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com \
    --cc=agordeev@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=andreas@gaisler.com \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=chenhuacai@kernel.org \
    --cc=christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu \
    --cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
    --cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=david@redhat.com \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=glaubitz@physik.fu-berlin.de \
    --cc=gor@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=hca@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=jiaxun.yang@flygoat.com \
    --cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mips@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-sh@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=loongarch@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
    --cc=nvdimm@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=palmer@dabbelt.com \
    --cc=rafael@kernel.org \
    --cc=robh@kernel.org \
    --cc=sparclinux@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=tsbogend@alpha.franken.de \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).