From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 91761C3DA5D for ; Mon, 22 Jul 2024 15:32:30 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender:List-Subscribe:List-Help :List-Post:List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:Content-Type:In-Reply-To: MIME-Version:References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=Jy2hKoepXG/rD4fs1gDu/NkLXDQ0MSD+ICWqPzfOpkw=; b=OGFu+8HsTo9Izuet0UAUiNLlbz 3x+cHBV6Oe+vbEoB6EdolnceJccD6lACvKJgPYNeFAnQCnoMtZeF49Q/0D66gxgxJ+14zOIniQbe2 Eu8yjf8MWKpFjeHP9LA1zd0RAjf2YAB4DNvzyq8JclPI8wXBrhwI0JZZscifpgqzH9vR7lU076+8o k4s4pGUPIl1mHZIatezj0HyLC1noNFYILWa+4cGRO+VWA0l63MGtla7kLGjxHvfobqudIwW7E6YnA f4qWp9NAAyZE4NfYqcIp7JumDHxtJ+iehos9exrNzVwbwDe7DLIMpBz4kL7g0Yq/TPs7Qx/uxToMD bh02norw==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.97.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1sVv1Q-00000009xph-1SNV; Mon, 22 Jul 2024 15:32:20 +0000 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com ([170.10.133.124]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.97.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1sVv10-00000009xhJ-3x6u for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Mon, 22 Jul 2024 15:31:56 +0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1721662314; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=Jy2hKoepXG/rD4fs1gDu/NkLXDQ0MSD+ICWqPzfOpkw=; b=T+Dn4v7SbpLL5u5mlQYCPeYPbGJe8NS62iw+6OztSmSdEUjhqoj4UWRkSqxKhqRY59UgnO FhvXHgOTx3GLu5qfjys7a0b+36wM77ZHq7BkUQ1DAETUfJk7+BXOVZ9PJdwOIMgtt0jdKU joxacJgBNjCcwlWNOd7SFOt6X3unF58= Received: from mail-yw1-f200.google.com (mail-yw1-f200.google.com [209.85.128.200]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.3, cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-498-cu8i9rjBNSW5n4mU5KS0ng-1; Mon, 22 Jul 2024 11:31:52 -0400 X-MC-Unique: cu8i9rjBNSW5n4mU5KS0ng-1 Received: by mail-yw1-f200.google.com with SMTP id 00721157ae682-66a9bff5a4eso9216847b3.0 for ; Mon, 22 Jul 2024 08:31:52 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1721662312; x=1722267112; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=Jy2hKoepXG/rD4fs1gDu/NkLXDQ0MSD+ICWqPzfOpkw=; b=WomlIqFVcxqhgaL0k4rpCcMVibnxcio5NNlIDgai02X/JHUwKAHaDBd/YVsqkDvkug affJybGZ150ICFSNQ1/Ilq1L9ohqrh/cBEDXAjt/iiJAUM/gYReQXuXik+HUBQIM5ATd phtAQTAeFQjjwTyKsBYUKWGmD0/sA2liceTwF7lGfOVHI6DhZHWd8l/qnK9si8JfY9Sj Fj+FB69bXqFWj+ZnY5IRaslL9mm6yst2kyV33Pc1pisruTkFsnoW/v99mfJWPaRi3W9a aIRiOX8feyN7DiSwmWkaW/+0MjHzD8TyIIScqAoveUa89VagjSWUq/FLvuZcJref1GrV ni0A== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCWnw/bUEwXDhzrBgb/gfZgceRCtZ+vZ1jWvACXTwS9LnunTdqvRR5JNBwfnIKPotKoBaL2cOnlQpXs/8Bidllot7hrlauDE10vfbjvYz+TZ6nkQ8PI= X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YxMqxkKktdnE3iUMm6Y4H1zUHWUGdKJxVUcYrIrlxywPgFSdGHo 3e1x9JmGeEtn5+tq5+Fedrnmnd+ZqDzo0MZngfZoWt3by94dr3lmaJM5gG2Utw9n031M1dhK8pX IJ12THMWIBTlhkHPs0Qn3SgmALKlArlWNCr+1zezx8Q9OjZEUMtuo784bzOSWP/p4NIHSWVO8 X-Received: by 2002:a05:690c:12:b0:62f:7951:fe4d with SMTP id 00721157ae682-66a6645377bmr38047447b3.4.1721662311575; Mon, 22 Jul 2024 08:31:51 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IEjAYBMqsJOtNPwFqnMhMAJ/HDPRITSVBivrOVSPNdHxvmNPnz6ZnQiqjkhPkHbmoLpOWtDQA== X-Received: by 2002:a05:690c:12:b0:62f:7951:fe4d with SMTP id 00721157ae682-66a6645377bmr38047287b3.4.1721662311092; Mon, 22 Jul 2024 08:31:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: from x1n (pool-99-254-121-117.cpe.net.cable.rogers.com. [99.254.121.117]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id af79cd13be357-7a198fba6efsm372071285a.41.2024.07.22.08.31.49 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Mon, 22 Jul 2024 08:31:50 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 22 Jul 2024 11:31:48 -0400 From: Peter Xu To: David Hildenbrand Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, Vlastimil Babka , Oscar Salvador , linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, Andrew Morton , Matthew Wilcox , Dan Williams , Michal Hocko , linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, sparclinux@vger.kernel.org, Alex Williamson , Jason Gunthorpe , x86@kernel.org, Alistair Popple , linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Ryan Roberts , Hugh Dickins , Axel Rasmussen Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 0/6] mm: THP-agnostic refactor on huge mappings Message-ID: References: <20240717220219.3743374-1-peterx@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20240722_083155_076437_02B6C81C X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 41.78 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Mon, Jul 22, 2024 at 03:29:43PM +0200, David Hildenbrand wrote: > On 18.07.24 00:02, Peter Xu wrote: > > This is an RFC series, so not yet for merging. Please don't be scared by > > the code changes: most of them are code movements only. > > > > This series is based on the dax mprotect fix series here (while that one is > > based on mm-unstable): > > > > [PATCH v3 0/8] mm/mprotect: Fix dax puds > > https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240715192142.3241557-1-peterx@redhat.com > > > > Overview > > ======== > > > > This series doesn't provide any feature change. The only goal of this > > series is to start decoupling two ideas: "THP" and "huge mapping". We > > already started with having PGTABLE_HAS_HUGE_LEAVES config option, and this > > one extends that idea into the code. > > > > The issue is that we have so many functions that only compile with > > CONFIG_THP=on, even though they're about huge mappings, and huge mapping is > > a pretty common concept, which can apply to many things besides THPs > > nowadays. The major THP file is mm/huge_memory.c as of now. > > > > The first example of such huge mapping users will be hugetlb. We lived > > until now with no problem simply because Linux almost duplicated all the > > logics there in the "THP" files into hugetlb APIs. If we want to get rid > > of hugetlb specific APIs and paths, this _might_ be the first thing we want > > to do, because we want to be able to e.g., zapping a hugetlb pmd entry even > > if !CONFIG_THP. > > > > Then consider other things like dax / pfnmaps. Dax can depend on THP, then > > it'll naturally be able to use pmd/pud helpers, that's okay. However is it > > a must? Do we also want to have every new pmd/pud mappings in the future > > to depend on THP (like PFNMAP)? My answer is no, but I'm open to opinions. > > > > If anyone agrees with me that "huge mapping" (aka, PMD/PUD mappings that > > are larger than PAGE_SIZE) is a more generic concept than THP, then I think > > at some point we need to move the generic code out of THP code into a > > common code base. > > > > This is what this series does as a start. > > Hi Peter! > > From a quick glimpse, patch #1-#4 do make sense independent of patch #5. > > I am not so sure about all of the code movement in patch #5. If large folios > are the future, then likely huge_memory.c should simply be the home for all > that logic. > > Maybe the goal should better be to compile huge_memory.c not only for THP, > but also for other use cases that require that logic, and fence off all THP > specific stuff using #ifdef? > > Not sure, though. But a lot of this code movements/churn might be avoidable. I'm fine using ifdefs in the current fine, but IMHO it's a matter of whether we want to keep huge_memory.c growing into even larger file, and keep all large folio logics only in that file. Currently it's ~4000 LOCs. Nornally I don't see this as much of a "code churn" category, because it doesn't changes the code itself but only move things. I personally also prefer without code churns, but only in the case where there'll be tiny little functional changes here and there without real benefit. It's pretty unavoidable to me when one file grows too large and we'll need to split, and in this case git doesn't have a good way to track such movement.. Irrelevant of this, just to mention I think there's still one option that I at least can make the huge pfnmap depends on THP again which shouldn't be a huge deal (I don't have any use case that needs huge pfnmap but disable THP, anyway..), so this series isn't an immediate concern to me for that route. But for a hugetlb rework this might be something we need to do, because we simplly can't make CONFIG_HUGETLB rely on CONFIG_THP.. Thanks, -- Peter Xu