linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Baoquan He <bhe@redhat.com>
To: Jinjie Ruan <ruanjinjie@huawei.com>
Cc: vgoyal@redhat.com, dyoung@redhat.com, paul.walmsley@sifive.com,
	palmer@dabbelt.com, aou@eecs.berkeley.edu, rppt@kernel.org,
	kexec@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5] crash: Fix crash memory reserve exceed system memory bug
Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2024 13:17:27 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Zp8859QW+YV1KqQ9@MiWiFi-R3L-srv> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240723020746.3945016-1-ruanjinjie@huawei.com>

On 07/23/24 at 10:07am, Jinjie Ruan wrote:
> On x86_32 Qemu machine with 1GB memory, the cmdline "crashkernel=4G" is ok
> as below:
> 	crashkernel reserved: 0x0000000020000000 - 0x0000000120000000 (4096 MB)
> 
> It's similar on other architectures, such as ARM32 and RISCV32.
> 
> The cause is that the crash_size is parsed and printed with "unsigned long
> long" data type which is 8 bytes but allocated used with "phys_addr_t"
> which is 4 bytes in memblock_phys_alloc_range().
> 
> Fix it by checking if crash_size is greater than system RAM size and
> return error if so.
> 
> After this patch, there is no above confusing reserve success info.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jinjie Ruan <ruanjinjie@huawei.com>
> Suggested-by: Baoquan He <bhe@redhat.com>
> Suggested-by: Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>


My Suggested-by can be taken off because I suggested to check the parsed
value after parse_crashkernel(), Mike's suggestion is better.

For this version,

Acked-by: Baoquan He <bhe@redhat.com>

> ---
> v5:
> - Fix it in common parse_crashkernel() instead of per-arch.
> - Add suggested-by.
> 
> v4:
> - Update the warn info to align with parse_crashkernel_mem().
> - Rebased on the "ARM: Use generic interface to simplify crashkernel
>   reservation" patch.
> - Also fix for riscv32.
> - Update the commit message.
> 
> v3:
> - Handle the check in reserve_crashkernel() Baoquan suggested.
> - Split x86_32 and arm32.
> - Add Suggested-by.
> - Drop the wrong fix tag.
> 
> v2:
> - Also fix for x86_32.
> - Update the fix method.
> - Peel off the other two patches.
> - Update the commit message.
> ---
>  kernel/crash_reserve.c | 3 +++
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/kernel/crash_reserve.c b/kernel/crash_reserve.c
> index ad5b3f2c5487..5387269114f6 100644
> --- a/kernel/crash_reserve.c
> +++ b/kernel/crash_reserve.c
> @@ -335,6 +335,9 @@ int __init parse_crashkernel(char *cmdline,
>  	if (!*crash_size)
>  		ret = -EINVAL;
>  
> +	if (*crash_size >= system_ram)
> +		ret = -EINVAL;
> +
>  	return ret;
>  }
>  
> -- 
> 2.34.1
> 



  reply	other threads:[~2024-07-23  5:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-07-23  2:07 [PATCH v5] crash: Fix crash memory reserve exceed system memory bug Jinjie Ruan
2024-07-23  5:17 ` Baoquan He [this message]
2024-07-29  3:24   ` Jinjie Ruan
2024-07-29  3:29     ` Baoquan He
2024-07-29 11:28       ` Jinjie Ruan

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Zp8859QW+YV1KqQ9@MiWiFi-R3L-srv \
    --to=bhe@redhat.com \
    --cc=aou@eecs.berkeley.edu \
    --cc=dyoung@redhat.com \
    --cc=kexec@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=palmer@dabbelt.com \
    --cc=paul.walmsley@sifive.com \
    --cc=rppt@kernel.org \
    --cc=ruanjinjie@huawei.com \
    --cc=vgoyal@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).