From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F3033C3DA63 for ; Thu, 18 Jul 2024 14:53:16 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender:List-Subscribe:List-Help :List-Post:List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:Content-Type: MIME-Version:References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=hxf7hMZcNIV1qzdiMAZiy7ZwMyVqDJrVEVjVhtapXug=; b=XaHjGaiAEY4Uc1E/2lvMgRePAk ddC1ZqjCgcFq5lkYBIIUK+Iu08hKNf6VpY0zbQbIHJT9kTkjnHwB4GqPeb6CHMnrF4UsC+hq+jter YD/UntIy9VjV87Vw0Fmk9LQxc0He5h/Mr0FdXdbrdqaqA1ThtQI/i5Ioe76O+RrqqGVaJOR853PJP Bp3VukTBkEXxbSCecHrxDHYRtNH7uUX4OFX9EZvLxDhe0OI062TYd4NVeZxXu1nmz+OoCxwufyZO7 TTuxsa8yShJnkBCNEsly+8Nf/7gsWDmcPp6o+XAkcpoLFyShgoWrVhVLu7b+aIWw8Aa52dZOx3x09 ff7pTQFA==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.97.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1sUSVC-0000000HLWj-2RI5; Thu, 18 Jul 2024 14:53:02 +0000 Received: from foss.arm.com ([217.140.110.172]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.97.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1sUSUq-0000000HLSn-2OZ7 for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Thu, 18 Jul 2024 14:52:42 +0000 Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 970C71063; Thu, 18 Jul 2024 07:53:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: from bogus (e103737-lin.cambridge.arm.com [10.1.197.49]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 873663F762; Thu, 18 Jul 2024 07:52:35 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 18 Jul 2024 15:52:32 +0100 From: Sudeep Holla To: Peng Fan Cc: "Peng Fan (OSS)" , Sudeep Holla , "cristian.marussi@arm.com" , "robh@kernel.org" , "krzk+dt@kernel.org" , "conor+dt@kernel.org" , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , "devicetree@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "arm-scmi@vger.kernel.org" Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND] dt-bindings: firmware: arm,scmi: support system power protocol Message-ID: References: <20240628030309.1162012-1-peng.fan@oss.nxp.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20240718_075240_682125_D5146AED X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 17.37 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Thu, Jul 18, 2024 at 12:15:20PM +0000, Peng Fan wrote: > Hi Sudeep, > > > Subject: RE: [PATCH RESEND] dt-bindings: firmware: arm,scmi: support > > system power protocol > > > > > Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND] dt-bindings: firmware: arm,scmi: > > support > > > system power protocol > > > > > > On Fri, Jun 28, 2024 at 11:03:09AM +0800, Peng Fan (OSS) wrote: > > > > From: Peng Fan > > > > > > > > Add SCMI System Power Protocol bindings, and the protocol id is > > > 0x12. > > > > > > > > > > I think we must have this node only if it has dedicated channel or any > > > other required property. > > > > I posted a patchset to support nodes not in device tree. And Cristian > > gave some comments: > > https://lore.kernel.org/all/Znv1p3FDiPSUNmBM@pluto/ > > > > Please suggest what should I do to avoid the dtbs_check issue. > > Should I switch back to > https://lore.kernel.org/all/Znv1p3FDiPSUNmBM@pluto/ > or else? > Sorry I need to discuss with Cristain and decide. I might have already discussed but I can't recall the details or decision(if any) made after that. He is away now, will get back once we discuss and see what is the best approach. -- Regards, Sudeep