From: Baoquan He <bhe@redhat.com>
To: Jinjie Ruan <ruanjinjie@huawei.com>
Cc: linux@armlinux.org.uk, catalin.marinas@arm.com, will@kernel.org,
chenhuacai@kernel.org, kernel@xen0n.name,
paul.walmsley@sifive.com, palmer@dabbelt.com,
aou@eecs.berkeley.edu, tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@redhat.com,
bp@alien8.de, dave.hansen@linux.intel.com, hpa@zytor.com,
vgoyal@redhat.com, dyoung@redhat.com, arnd@arndb.de, afd@ti.com,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, linus.walleij@linaro.org,
eric.devolder@oracle.com, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org,
javierm@redhat.com, deller@gmx.de, robh@kernel.org,
thunder.leizhen@huawei.com, hbathini@linux.ibm.com,
tangyouling@kylinos.cn, chenjiahao16@huawei.com,
kexec@lists.infradead.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/3] crash: Fix x86_32 crash memory reserve dead loop
Date: Fri, 19 Jul 2024 20:29:18 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZppcHqO2iMZeox1L@MiWiFi-R3L-srv> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240719095735.1912878-3-ruanjinjie@huawei.com>
On 07/19/24 at 05:57pm, Jinjie Ruan wrote:
> On x86_32 Qemu machine with 1GB memory, the cmdline "crashkernel=512M" will
> also cause system stall as below:
>
> ACPI: Reserving FACP table memory at [mem 0x3ffe18b8-0x3ffe192b]
> ACPI: Reserving DSDT table memory at [mem 0x3ffe0040-0x3ffe18b7]
> ACPI: Reserving FACS table memory at [mem 0x3ffe0000-0x3ffe003f]
> ACPI: Reserving APIC table memory at [mem 0x3ffe192c-0x3ffe19bb]
> ACPI: Reserving HPET table memory at [mem 0x3ffe19bc-0x3ffe19f3]
> ACPI: Reserving WAET table memory at [mem 0x3ffe19f4-0x3ffe1a1b]
> 143MB HIGHMEM available.
> 879MB LOWMEM available.
> mapped low ram: 0 - 36ffe000
> low ram: 0 - 36ffe000
> (stall here)
>
> The reason is that the CRASH_ADDR_LOW_MAX is equal to CRASH_ADDR_HIGH_MAX
> on x86_32, the first "low" crash kernel memory reservation for 512M fails,
> then it go into the "retry" loop and never came out as below (consider
> CRASH_ADDR_LOW_MAX = CRASH_ADDR_HIGH_MAX = 512M):
>
> -> reserve_crashkernel_generic() and high is false
> -> alloc at [0, 0x20000000] fail
> -> alloc at [0x20000000, 0x20000000] fail and repeatedly
> (because CRASH_ADDR_LOW_MAX = CRASH_ADDR_HIGH_MAX).
>
> Fix it by skipping meaningless calls of memblock_phys_alloc_range() with
> `start = end`
>
> After this patch, the retry dead loop is avoided and print below info:
> cannot allocate crashkernel (size:0x20000000)
>
> And apply generic crashkernel reservation to 32bit system will be ready.
~~~ applying
Other than this nit, it looks good to me.
Acked-by: Baoquan He <bhe@redhat.com>
>
> Fixes: 9c08a2a139fe ("x86: kdump: use generic interface to simplify crashkernel reservation code")
> Signed-off-by: Jinjie Ruan <ruanjinjie@huawei.com>
> Suggested-by: Baoquan He <bhe@redhat.com>
> ---
> v4:
> - Signed-off-by -> Suggested-by as suggested.
> - Remove the Tested-by as suggested.
> - Update the commit subject
> v3:
> - Fix it as Baoquan suggested.
> - Update the commit message.
> ---
> kernel/crash_reserve.c | 3 ++-
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/crash_reserve.c b/kernel/crash_reserve.c
> index c5213f123e19..dacc268429e2 100644
> --- a/kernel/crash_reserve.c
> +++ b/kernel/crash_reserve.c
> @@ -414,7 +414,8 @@ void __init reserve_crashkernel_generic(char *cmdline,
> search_end = CRASH_ADDR_HIGH_MAX;
> search_base = CRASH_ADDR_LOW_MAX;
> crash_low_size = DEFAULT_CRASH_KERNEL_LOW_SIZE;
> - goto retry;
> + if (search_base != search_end)
> + goto retry;
> }
>
> /*
> --
> 2.34.1
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-07-19 12:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-07-19 9:57 [PATCH v4 0/3] crash: Fix x86_32 memory reserve dead loop bug Jinjie Ruan
2024-07-19 9:57 ` [PATCH v4 1/3] crash: Fix x86_32 crash " Jinjie Ruan
2024-07-19 9:57 ` [PATCH v4 2/3] crash: Fix x86_32 crash memory reserve dead loop Jinjie Ruan
2024-07-19 12:29 ` Baoquan He [this message]
2024-07-19 9:57 ` [PATCH v4 3/3] ARM: Use generic interface to simplify crashkernel reservation Jinjie Ruan
2024-07-22 1:38 ` Baoquan He
2024-07-22 1:52 ` Jinjie Ruan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZppcHqO2iMZeox1L@MiWiFi-R3L-srv \
--to=bhe@redhat.com \
--cc=afd@ti.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=aou@eecs.berkeley.edu \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=chenhuacai@kernel.org \
--cc=chenjiahao16@huawei.com \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=deller@gmx.de \
--cc=dyoung@redhat.com \
--cc=eric.devolder@oracle.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=hbathini@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=javierm@redhat.com \
--cc=kernel@xen0n.name \
--cc=kexec@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=palmer@dabbelt.com \
--cc=paul.walmsley@sifive.com \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=ruanjinjie@huawei.com \
--cc=tangyouling@kylinos.cn \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=thunder.leizhen@huawei.com \
--cc=vgoyal@redhat.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).