linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sebastian Ene <sebastianene@google.com>
To: Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@linux.dev>
Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, alexghiti@rivosinc.com,
	ankita@nvidia.com, ardb@kernel.org, catalin.marinas@arm.com,
	christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu, james.morse@arm.com,
	vdonnefort@google.com, mark.rutland@arm.com, maz@kernel.org,
	rananta@google.com, ryan.roberts@arm.com, shahuang@redhat.com,
	suzuki.poulose@arm.com, will@kernel.org, yuzenghui@huawei.com,
	kvmarm@lists.linux.dev, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel-team@android.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 5/6] KVM: arm64: Initialize the ptdump parser with stage-2 attributes
Date: Fri, 19 Jul 2024 14:01:15 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Zppxq_8OC56HRHfi@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Zn8omLmCSIHun1uq@linux.dev>

On Fri, Jun 28, 2024 at 09:18:16PM +0000, Oliver Upton wrote:
> Hi Seb,
> 
> On Fri, Jun 21, 2024 at 12:32:29PM +0000, Sebastian Ene wrote:
> > Define a set of attributes used by the ptdump parser to display the
> > properties of a guest memory region covered by a pagetable descriptor.
> > Build a description of the pagetable levels and initialize the parser
> > with this configuration.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Sebastian Ene <sebastianene@google.com>
> 
> This patch should come *before* patch 4, no point in exposing the
> debugfs file if we aren't ready to handle it yet.
> 

This is true but this patch doesn't make sense without 4 because here I
add a bunch of functions which will not be invoked (they are invoked
from the debugfs calls).

IMO we can squash them (4 and 5) but it will be a bit harder to follow.
Let me know what you think, thanks.

Seb

> > ---
> >  arch/arm64/kvm/ptdump.c | 143 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
> >  1 file changed, 137 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/ptdump.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/ptdump.c
> > index 36dc7662729f..cc1d4fdddc6e 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/ptdump.c
> > +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/ptdump.c
> > @@ -14,6 +14,61 @@
> >  #include <kvm_ptdump.h>
> >  
> >  
> > +#define MARKERS_LEN		(2)
> > +#define KVM_PGTABLE_MAX_LEVELS	(KVM_PGTABLE_LAST_LEVEL + 1)
> > +
> > +struct kvm_ptdump_guest_state {
> > +	struct kvm		*kvm;
> > +	struct pg_state		parser_state;
> > +	struct addr_marker	ipa_marker[MARKERS_LEN];
> > +	struct pg_level		level[KVM_PGTABLE_MAX_LEVELS];
> > +	struct ptdump_range	range[MARKERS_LEN];
> > +};
> > +
> > +static const struct prot_bits stage2_pte_bits[] = {
> > +	{
> > +		.mask	= PTE_VALID,
> > +		.val	= PTE_VALID,
> > +		.set	= " ",
> > +		.clear	= "F",
> > +	}, {
> > +		.mask	= KVM_PTE_LEAF_ATTR_HI_S2_XN | PTE_VALID,
> > +		.val	= KVM_PTE_LEAF_ATTR_HI_S2_XN | PTE_VALID,
> > +		.set	= "XN",
> > +		.clear	= "  ",
> > +	}, {
> > +		.mask	= KVM_PTE_LEAF_ATTR_LO_S2_S2AP_R | PTE_VALID,
> > +		.val	= KVM_PTE_LEAF_ATTR_LO_S2_S2AP_R | PTE_VALID,
> > +		.set	= "R",
> > +		.clear	= " ",
> > +	}, {
> > +		.mask	= KVM_PTE_LEAF_ATTR_LO_S2_S2AP_W | PTE_VALID,
> > +		.val	= KVM_PTE_LEAF_ATTR_LO_S2_S2AP_W | PTE_VALID,
> > +		.set	= "W",
> > +		.clear	= " ",
> > +	}, {
> > +		.mask	= KVM_PTE_LEAF_ATTR_LO_S2_AF | PTE_VALID,
> > +		.val	= KVM_PTE_LEAF_ATTR_LO_S2_AF | PTE_VALID,
> > +		.set	= "AF",
> > +		.clear	= "  ",
> 
> <snip>
> 
> > +	}, {
> > +		.mask	= PTE_NG,
> > +		.val	= PTE_NG,
> > +		.set	= "FnXS",
> > +		.clear	= "  ",
> > +	}, {
> > +		.mask	= PTE_CONT | PTE_VALID,
> > +		.val	= PTE_CONT | PTE_VALID,
> > +		.set	= "CON",
> > +		.clear	= "   ",
> > +	}, {
> 
> </snip>
> 
> Neither of these bits are used at stage-2, why have descriptors for
> them?
> 
> > +static int kvm_ptdump_build_levels(struct pg_level *level, u32 start_lvl)
> > +{
> > +	static const char * const level_names[] = {"PGD", "PUD", "PMD", "PTE"};
> > +	u32 i = 0;
> > +	u64 mask = 0;
> > +
> > +	if (start_lvl > 2) {
> > +		pr_err("invalid start_lvl %u\n", start_lvl);
> > +		return -EINVAL;
> > +	}
> 
> 	if (WARN_ON_ONCE(start_lvl >= KVM_PGTABLE_LAST_LEVEL))
> 		return -EINVAL;
> 
> > +	for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(stage2_pte_bits); i++)
> > +		mask |= stage2_pte_bits[i].mask;
> > +
> > +	for (i = start_lvl; i < KVM_PGTABLE_MAX_LEVELS; i++) {
> > +		strscpy(level[i].name, level_names[i], sizeof(level[i].name));
> > +
> > +		level[i].num	= ARRAY_SIZE(stage2_pte_bits);
> > +		level[i].bits	= stage2_pte_bits;
> > +		level[i].mask	= mask;
> > +	}
> > +
> > +	if (start_lvl > 0)
> > +		strscpy(level[start_lvl].name, level_names[0], sizeof(level_names[0]));
> 
> This should pass the size of @dst, not the source. This becomes slightly
> more self-documenting if you use a literal for "PGD" here too.
> 
> 		strscpy(level[start_lvl].name, "PGD", sizeof(level[start_lvl].name));
> 
> > +	return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static struct kvm_ptdump_guest_state
> > +*kvm_ptdump_parser_init(struct kvm *kvm)
> > +{
> > +	struct kvm_ptdump_guest_state *st;
> > +	struct kvm_s2_mmu *mmu = &kvm->arch.mmu;
> > +	struct kvm_pgtable *pgtable = mmu->pgt;
> > +	int ret;
> > +
> > +	st = kzalloc(sizeof(struct kvm_ptdump_guest_state), GFP_KERNEL_ACCOUNT);
> > +	if (!st)
> > +		return NULL;
> > +
> > +	ret = kvm_ptdump_build_levels(&st->level[0], pgtable->start_level);
> > +	if (ret)
> > +		goto free_with_state;
> 
> I don't see any value in the use of goto here, as there isn't any sort
> of cascading initialization / cleanup. This also presents an opportunity
> to get an error back out to the caller.
> 
> 	if (ret) {
> 		kfree(st);
> 		return ERR_PTR(ret);
> 	}
> 
> > @@ -57,22 +176,34 @@ static int kvm_ptdump_guest_show(struct seq_file *m, void *unused)
> >  static int kvm_ptdump_guest_open(struct inode *m, struct file *file)
> >  {
> >  	struct kvm *kvm = m->i_private;
> > +	struct kvm_ptdump_guest_state *st;
> >  	int ret;
> >  
> >  	if (!kvm_get_kvm_safe(kvm))
> >  		return -ENOENT;
> >  
> > -	ret = single_open(file, kvm_ptdump_guest_show, m->i_private);
> > -	if (ret < 0)
> > -		kvm_put_kvm(kvm);
> > +	st = kvm_ptdump_parser_init(kvm);
> > +	if (!st) {
> > +		ret = -ENOMEM;
> > +		goto free_with_kvm_ref;
> > +	}
> 
> (with the earlier suggestion)
> 
> 	st = kvm_ptdump_parser_init(kvm);
> 	if (IS_ERR(st)) {
> 		ret = PTR_ERR(st);
> 		goto free_with_kvm_ref;
> 	}
> 
> Otherwise genuine KVM bugs (-EINVAL) are getting lumped into ENOMEM.
> 
> -- 
> Thanks,
> Oliver


  parent reply	other threads:[~2024-07-19 14:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-06-21 12:32 [PATCH v7 0/6] arm64: ptdump: View the second stage page-tables Sebastian Ene
2024-06-21 12:32 ` [PATCH v7 1/6] KVM: arm64: Move pagetable definitions to common header Sebastian Ene
2024-06-21 12:32 ` [PATCH v7 2/6] arm64: ptdump: Expose the attribute parsing functionality Sebastian Ene
2024-07-05 11:07   ` Will Deacon
2024-07-19 11:44     ` Sebastian Ene
2024-06-21 12:32 ` [PATCH v7 3/6] arm64: ptdump: Use the mask from the state structure Sebastian Ene
2024-07-05 11:12   ` Will Deacon
2024-07-19 13:27     ` Sebastian Ene
2024-06-21 12:32 ` [PATCH v7 4/6] KVM: arm64: Register ptdump with debugfs on guest creation Sebastian Ene
2024-06-21 12:32 ` [PATCH v7 5/6] KVM: arm64: Initialize the ptdump parser with stage-2 attributes Sebastian Ene
2024-06-28 21:18   ` Oliver Upton
2024-07-01 14:17     ` Sebastian Ene
2024-07-08 19:47       ` Oliver Upton
2024-07-19 14:01     ` Sebastian Ene [this message]
2024-07-01  8:42   ` Vincent Donnefort
2024-07-01 14:18     ` Sebastian Ene
2024-07-16  9:59       ` Vincent Donnefort
2024-07-19 14:09         ` Sebastian Ene
2024-07-19 14:36           ` Vincent Donnefort
2024-07-19 16:27             ` Sebastian Ene
2024-06-21 12:32 ` [PATCH v7 6/6] KVM: arm64: Expose guest stage-2 pagetable config to debugfs Sebastian Ene
2024-06-28 20:49   ` Oliver Upton
2024-07-01 14:10     ` Sebastian Ene
2024-06-28 21:25 ` [PATCH v7 0/6] arm64: ptdump: View the second stage page-tables Oliver Upton
2024-07-01 14:22   ` Sebastian Ene

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Zppxq_8OC56HRHfi@google.com \
    --to=sebastianene@google.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=alexghiti@rivosinc.com \
    --cc=ankita@nvidia.com \
    --cc=ardb@kernel.org \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu \
    --cc=james.morse@arm.com \
    --cc=kernel-team@android.com \
    --cc=kvmarm@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=maz@kernel.org \
    --cc=oliver.upton@linux.dev \
    --cc=rananta@google.com \
    --cc=ryan.roberts@arm.com \
    --cc=shahuang@redhat.com \
    --cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
    --cc=vdonnefort@google.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    --cc=yuzenghui@huawei.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).