From: Baoquan He <bhe@redhat.com>
To: Jinjie Ruan <ruanjinjie@huawei.com>
Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, vgoyal@redhat.com, dyoung@redhat.com,
paul.walmsley@sifive.com, palmer@dabbelt.com,
aou@eecs.berkeley.edu, rppt@kernel.org,
kexec@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5] crash: Fix crash memory reserve exceed system memory bug
Date: Mon, 29 Jul 2024 11:29:46 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZqcMqsMo8SYVv4Tl@MiWiFi-R3L-srv> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <564e362d-5e8c-5d23-9c54-bfb811794169@huawei.com>
On 07/29/24 at 11:24am, Jinjie Ruan wrote:
>
>
> On 2024/7/23 13:17, Baoquan He wrote:
> > On 07/23/24 at 10:07am, Jinjie Ruan wrote:
> >> On x86_32 Qemu machine with 1GB memory, the cmdline "crashkernel=4G" is ok
> >> as below:
> >> crashkernel reserved: 0x0000000020000000 - 0x0000000120000000 (4096 MB)
> >>
> >> It's similar on other architectures, such as ARM32 and RISCV32.
> >>
> >> The cause is that the crash_size is parsed and printed with "unsigned long
> >> long" data type which is 8 bytes but allocated used with "phys_addr_t"
> >> which is 4 bytes in memblock_phys_alloc_range().
> >>
> >> Fix it by checking if crash_size is greater than system RAM size and
> >> return error if so.
> >>
> >> After this patch, there is no above confusing reserve success info.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Jinjie Ruan <ruanjinjie@huawei.com>
> >> Suggested-by: Baoquan He <bhe@redhat.com>
> >> Suggested-by: Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>
> >
> >
> > My Suggested-by can be taken off because I suggested to check the parsed
> > value after parse_crashkernel(), Mike's suggestion is better.
>
> Hi, Can the suggested-by be removed when this version is merged, or a
> new version needs to be sent?
You can send a new one and CC Andrew.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-07-29 3:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-07-23 2:07 [PATCH v5] crash: Fix crash memory reserve exceed system memory bug Jinjie Ruan
2024-07-23 5:17 ` Baoquan He
2024-07-29 3:24 ` Jinjie Ruan
2024-07-29 3:29 ` Baoquan He [this message]
2024-07-29 11:28 ` Jinjie Ruan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZqcMqsMo8SYVv4Tl@MiWiFi-R3L-srv \
--to=bhe@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=aou@eecs.berkeley.edu \
--cc=dyoung@redhat.com \
--cc=kexec@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=palmer@dabbelt.com \
--cc=paul.walmsley@sifive.com \
--cc=rppt@kernel.org \
--cc=ruanjinjie@huawei.com \
--cc=vgoyal@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).