From: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
To: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>
Cc: will@kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, ilkka@os.amperecomputing.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/8] perf/arm-cmn: Fix CCLA register offset
Date: Fri, 16 Aug 2024 11:00:06 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Zr8jJq3l9sfvJuil@J2N7QTR9R3> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <e73b31da42a7840d4247fc8a4a3cea805c2ab618.1723229941.git.robin.murphy@arm.com>
On Fri, Aug 09, 2024 at 08:15:41PM +0100, Robin Murphy wrote:
> Apparently pmu_event_sel is offset by 8 for all CCLA nodes, not just
> the CCLA_RNI combination type.
Was there some reason we used to think that was specific to CCLA_RNI
nodes, or was that just an oversight?
Looking at the CMN-700 TRM and scanning for pmu_event_sel, we have:
16'h2000 por_ccg_ha_pmu_event_sel
16'h2000 por_ccg_ra_pmu_event_sel
16'h2008 por_ccla_pmu_event_sel
16'h2000 por_dn_pmu_event_sel
16'h2000 cmn_hns_pmu_event_sel
16'h2000 por_hni_pmu_event_sel
16'h2008 por_hnp_pmu_event_sel
16'h2000 por_mxp_pmu_event_sel
16'h2000 por_rnd_pmu_event_sel
16'h2000 por_rni_pmu_event_sel
16'h2000 por_sbsx_pmu_event_sel
> Fixes: 23760a014417 ("perf/arm-cmn: Add CMN-700 support")
> Signed-off-by: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>
> ---
> drivers/perf/arm-cmn.c | 5 ++++-
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/perf/arm-cmn.c b/drivers/perf/arm-cmn.c
> index fd2122a37f22..0e2e12e2f4fb 100644
> --- a/drivers/perf/arm-cmn.c
> +++ b/drivers/perf/arm-cmn.c
> @@ -2393,10 +2393,13 @@ static int arm_cmn_discover(struct arm_cmn *cmn, unsigned int rgn_offset)
> case CMN_TYPE_CXHA:
> case CMN_TYPE_CCRA:
> case CMN_TYPE_CCHA:
> - case CMN_TYPE_CCLA:
> case CMN_TYPE_HNS:
> dn++;
> break;
> + case CMN_TYPE_CCLA:
> + dn->pmu_base += CMN_HNP_PMU_EVENT_SEL;
> + dn++;
> + break;
When reading this for the first time, it looks like a copy-paste error
since CMN_HNP_PMU_EVENT_SEL doesn't have any obvious relationship with
CCLA nodes.
I reckon it'd be worth adding CMN_CCLA_PMU_EVENT_SEL, and replacing the
existing comment above the definition of CMN_HNP_PMU_EVENT_SEL, e.g.
/*
* Some nodes place common registers at different offsets from most
* other nodes.
*/
#define CMN_HNP_PMU_EVENT_SEL 0x008
#define CMN_CCLA_PMU_EVENT_SEL 0x008
That way the switch looks less suspicious, and the comment is a bit more
helpful to anyone trying to figure out what's going on here.
With that:
Acked-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Mark.
> /* Nothing to see here */
> case CMN_TYPE_MPAM_S:
> case CMN_TYPE_MPAM_NS:
> --
> 2.39.2.101.g768bb238c484.dirty
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-08-16 10:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-08-09 19:15 [PATCH 0/8] perf/arm-cmn: Fixes and updates Robin Murphy
2024-08-09 19:15 ` [PATCH 1/8] perf/arm-cmn: Refactor node ID handling. Again Robin Murphy
2024-08-16 9:33 ` Mark Rutland
2024-08-16 11:56 ` Robin Murphy
2024-08-16 12:45 ` Mark Rutland
2024-08-16 13:21 ` Robin Murphy
2024-08-24 1:00 ` Ilkka Koskinen
2024-08-27 13:51 ` Robin Murphy
2024-08-09 19:15 ` [PATCH 2/8] perf/arm-cmn: Fix CCLA register offset Robin Murphy
2024-08-16 10:00 ` Mark Rutland [this message]
2024-08-16 18:33 ` Robin Murphy
2024-08-23 23:18 ` Ilkka Koskinen
2024-08-09 19:15 ` [PATCH 3/8] perf/arm-cmn: Ensure dtm_idx is big enough Robin Murphy
2024-08-16 10:14 ` Mark Rutland
2024-08-19 15:00 ` Robin Murphy
2024-08-20 9:27 ` Mark Rutland
2024-08-23 23:58 ` Ilkka Koskinen
2024-08-09 19:15 ` [PATCH 4/8] perf/arm-cmn: Improve build-time assertions Robin Murphy
2024-08-16 10:20 ` Mark Rutland
2024-08-09 19:15 ` [PATCH 5/8] perf/arm-cmn: Make cycle counts less surprising Robin Murphy
2024-08-16 10:25 ` Mark Rutland
2024-08-19 16:35 ` Robin Murphy
2024-08-09 19:15 ` [PATCH 6/8] perf/arm-cmn: Refactor DTC PMU register access Robin Murphy
2024-08-16 10:29 ` Mark Rutland
2024-08-19 16:41 ` Robin Murphy
2024-08-20 9:23 ` Mark Rutland
2024-08-23 23:46 ` Ilkka Koskinen
2024-08-09 19:15 ` [PATCH 7/8] dt-bindings: perf: arm-cmn: Add CMN S3 Robin Murphy
2024-08-15 15:20 ` Rob Herring (Arm)
2024-08-09 19:15 ` [PATCH 8/8] perf/arm-cmn: Support " Robin Murphy
2024-08-16 10:32 ` Mark Rutland
2024-08-23 23:38 ` Ilkka Koskinen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Zr8jJq3l9sfvJuil@J2N7QTR9R3 \
--to=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=ilkka@os.amperecomputing.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox