linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sebastian Ene <sebastianene@google.com>
To: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, alexghiti@rivosinc.com,
	ankita@nvidia.com, ardb@kernel.org, catalin.marinas@arm.com,
	christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu, james.morse@arm.com,
	vdonnefort@google.com, mark.rutland@arm.com,
	oliver.upton@linux.dev, rananta@google.com, ryan.roberts@arm.com,
	shahuang@redhat.com, suzuki.poulose@arm.com, will@kernel.org,
	yuzenghui@huawei.com, kvmarm@lists.linux.dev,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel-team@android.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 5/6] KVM: arm64: Initialize the ptdump parser with stage-2 attributes
Date: Fri, 23 Aug 2024 05:21:58 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Zsgcdjh4EvqFWMlA@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <8634mwy1mt.wl-maz@kernel.org>

On Thu, Aug 22, 2024 at 05:15:54PM +0100, 'Marc Zyngier' via kernel-team wrote:
> On Tue, 20 Aug 2024 15:20:25 +0100,
> Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org> wrote:
> > 
> > On Fri, 16 Aug 2024 13:39:05 +0100,
> > Sebastian Ene <sebastianene@google.com> wrote:
> > > 
> > > Define a set of attributes used by the ptdump parser to display the
> > > properties of a guest memory region covered by a pagetable descriptor.
> > > Build a description of the pagetable levels and initialize the parser
> > > with this configuration.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Sebastian Ene <sebastianene@google.com>
> > > ---
> > >  arch/arm64/kvm/ptdump.c | 135 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
> > >  1 file changed, 129 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/ptdump.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/ptdump.c
> > > index 52483d56be2e..79be07ec3c3c 100644
> > > --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/ptdump.c
> > > +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/ptdump.c
> > > @@ -14,6 +14,51 @@
> > >  #include <kvm_ptdump.h>
> > >  
> > >  
> > > +#define MARKERS_LEN		(2)
> > > +#define KVM_PGTABLE_MAX_LEVELS	(KVM_PGTABLE_LAST_LEVEL + 1)
> > > +
> > > +struct kvm_ptdump_guest_state {
> > > +	struct kvm		*kvm;
> > > +	struct ptdump_pg_state	parser_state;
> > > +	struct addr_marker	ipa_marker[MARKERS_LEN];
> > > +	struct ptdump_pg_level	level[KVM_PGTABLE_MAX_LEVELS];
> > > +	struct ptdump_range	range[MARKERS_LEN];
> > > +};
> > > +
> > > +static const struct ptdump_prot_bits stage2_pte_bits[] = {
> > > +	{
> > > +		.mask	= PTE_VALID,
> > > +		.val	= PTE_VALID,
> > > +		.set	= " ",
> > > +		.clear	= "F",
> > > +	}, {
> > > +		.mask	= KVM_PTE_LEAF_ATTR_LO_S2_S2AP_R | PTE_VALID,
> > > +		.val	= KVM_PTE_LEAF_ATTR_LO_S2_S2AP_R | PTE_VALID,
> > > +		.set	= "R",
> > > +		.clear	= " ",
> > > +	}, {
> > > +		.mask	= KVM_PTE_LEAF_ATTR_LO_S2_S2AP_W | PTE_VALID,
> > > +		.val	= KVM_PTE_LEAF_ATTR_LO_S2_S2AP_W | PTE_VALID,
> > > +		.set	= "W",
> > > +		.clear	= " ",
> > > +	}, {
> > > +		.mask	= KVM_PTE_LEAF_ATTR_HI_S2_XN | PTE_VALID,
> > > +		.val	= PTE_VALID,
> > > +		.set	= " ",
> > > +		.clear	= "X",
> > > +	}, {
> > > +		.mask	= KVM_PTE_LEAF_ATTR_LO_S2_AF | PTE_VALID,
> > > +		.val	= KVM_PTE_LEAF_ATTR_LO_S2_AF | PTE_VALID,
> > > +		.set	= "AF",
> > > +		.clear	= "  ",
> > > +	}, {
> > > +		.mask	= PTE_TABLE_BIT | PTE_VALID,
> > > +		.val	= PTE_VALID,
> > > +		.set	= "BLK",
> > > +		.clear	= "   ",
> > > +	},
> > > +};
> > > +
> > >  static int kvm_ptdump_visitor(const struct kvm_pgtable_visit_ctx *ctx,
> > >  			      enum kvm_pgtable_walk_flags visit)
> > >  {
> > > @@ -40,15 +85,81 @@ static int kvm_ptdump_show_common(struct seq_file *m,
> > >  	return kvm_pgtable_walk(pgtable, 0, BIT(pgtable->ia_bits), &walker);
> > >  }
> > >  
> > > +static int kvm_ptdump_build_levels(struct ptdump_pg_level *level, u32 start_lvl)
> > > +{
> > > +	static const char * const level_names[] = {"PGD", "PUD", "PMD", "PTE"};
> > 
> > How about 5 level page tables, which we support since v6.8? The
> > architecture uses a SL=-1 in this case, and I have the feeling this is
> > going to expose in a lovely way, given that you use a u32 for
> > start_level... :-/
> 

Hello Marc,

> Talking to Oliver, I just had an epiphany: we never have a 5th level
> with KVM, because we always use concatenated page tables at the start
> level. So the depth is still 4 levels, but we get up to 16 pages at
> level 0, and that's how we expand the IPA space from 48 to 52 bits.
> 

Thanks for letting me know. Then it should be fine keeping that as an
unisgned integer.

> So by the look of it, your code should still be OK with only 4 levels.
> 

Thanks,
Seb

> Apologies for leading you in the wrong direction.
> 
> 	M.
> 
> -- 
> Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible.
> 
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to kernel-team+unsubscribe@android.com.
> 


  reply	other threads:[~2024-08-23  5:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-08-16 12:39 [PATCH v8 0/6] arm64: ptdump: View the second stage page-tables Sebastian Ene
2024-08-16 12:39 ` [PATCH v8 1/6] KVM: arm64: Move pagetable definitions to common header Sebastian Ene
2024-08-16 12:39 ` [PATCH v8 2/6] arm64: ptdump: Expose the attribute parsing functionality Sebastian Ene
2024-08-16 12:39 ` [PATCH v8 3/6] arm64: ptdump: Use the mask from the state structure Sebastian Ene
2024-08-20 13:49   ` Marc Zyngier
2024-08-20 14:13     ` Sebastian Ene
2024-08-20 14:25       ` Marc Zyngier
2024-08-20 14:39         ` Sebastian Ene
2024-08-16 12:39 ` [PATCH v8 4/6] KVM: arm64: Register ptdump with debugfs on guest creation Sebastian Ene
2024-08-20 14:06   ` Marc Zyngier
2024-08-23 10:45     ` Sebastian Ene
2024-08-23 10:53     ` Sebastian Ene
2024-08-16 12:39 ` [PATCH v8 5/6] KVM: arm64: Initialize the ptdump parser with stage-2 attributes Sebastian Ene
2024-08-19 10:28   ` Vincent Donnefort
2024-08-19 12:18     ` Sebastian Ene
2024-08-20 14:20   ` Marc Zyngier
2024-08-22 16:15     ` Marc Zyngier
2024-08-23  5:21       ` Sebastian Ene [this message]
2024-08-16 12:39 ` [PATCH v8 6/6] KVM: arm64: Expose guest stage-2 pagetable config to debugfs Sebastian Ene

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Zsgcdjh4EvqFWMlA@google.com \
    --to=sebastianene@google.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=alexghiti@rivosinc.com \
    --cc=ankita@nvidia.com \
    --cc=ardb@kernel.org \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu \
    --cc=james.morse@arm.com \
    --cc=kernel-team@android.com \
    --cc=kvmarm@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=maz@kernel.org \
    --cc=oliver.upton@linux.dev \
    --cc=rananta@google.com \
    --cc=ryan.roberts@arm.com \
    --cc=shahuang@redhat.com \
    --cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
    --cc=vdonnefort@google.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    --cc=yuzenghui@huawei.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).