linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Kousik Sanagavarapu <five231003@gmail.com>
To: Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>
Cc: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>,
	Santosh Shilimkar <ssantosh@kernel.org>,
	Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>,
	Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@inria.fr>,
	Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>,
	Javier Carrasco <javier.carrasco.cruz@gmail.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/4] soc: ti: pruss: factor out memories setup
Date: Sun, 25 Aug 2024 12:08:28 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZsrRZLqgtegrbwO7@five231003> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240824184950.gzsgdawt2ujjt6ky@subgroup>

On Sat, Aug 24, 2024 at 01:49:50PM -0500, Nishanth Menon wrote:
> On 10:44-20240707, Kousik Sanagavarapu wrote:
> > Factor out memories setup code from probe() into a new function
> > pruss_of_setup_memories().  This sets the stage for introducing auto
> > cleanup of the device node (done in the subsequent patch), since the
> > clean up depends on the scope of the pointer and factoring out
> > code into a seperate function obviously limits the scope of the various
> typo s/seperate/separate - use --codespell with checkpatch to catch :)
> 
> A follow on patch has the same problem as well.

Oh, yes should've used --codespell, my bad.  Thanks for spotting.

> > variables used in that function.

[...]

> > -	of_node_put(child);
> > +	ret = pruss_of_setup_memories(dev, pruss);
> > +	if (ret < 0)
> > +		goto rpm_put;
> 
> Why? We have not called pm_runtime_enable at this point.

Didn't catch this too, will change.

Thanks


  reply	other threads:[~2024-08-25  6:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-07-07  5:14 [PATCH v3 0/4] Do device node auto cleanup in drivers/soc/ti/ Kousik Sanagavarapu
2024-07-07  5:14 ` [PATCH v3 1/4] soc: ti: pruss: factor out memories setup Kousik Sanagavarapu
2024-08-24 18:49   ` Nishanth Menon
2024-08-25  6:38     ` Kousik Sanagavarapu [this message]
2024-07-07  5:14 ` [PATCH v3 2/4] soc: ti: pruss: do device_node auto cleanup Kousik Sanagavarapu
2024-07-07  5:14 ` [PATCH v3 3/4] soc: ti: knav_qmss_queue: " Kousik Sanagavarapu
2024-07-07  5:14 ` [PATCH v3 4/4] soc: ti: pm33xx: " Kousik Sanagavarapu
2024-07-17 21:34 ` [PATCH v3 0/4] Do device node auto cleanup in drivers/soc/ti/ Kousik Sanagavarapu
2024-07-18 11:21   ` Nishanth Menon
2024-07-18 14:12     ` Kousik Sanagavarapu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ZsrRZLqgtegrbwO7@five231003 \
    --to=five231003@gmail.com \
    --cc=Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com \
    --cc=javier.carrasco.cruz@gmail.com \
    --cc=julia.lawall@inria.fr \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nathan@kernel.org \
    --cc=nm@ti.com \
    --cc=skhan@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=ssantosh@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).