Re: [PATCH v3] ACPI: introduce acpi_arch_init

[Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>]

On Wed, Aug 28, 2024 at 04:40:29AM +0800, Miao Wang wrote:
> 
> 
> > 2024年8月8日 17:43，Hanjun Guo <guohanjun@huawei.com> 写道：
> > 
> > On 2024/8/8 17:00, Miao Wang via B4 Relay wrote:
> >> From: Miao Wang <shankerwangmiao@gmail.com>
> >> To avoid arch-specific code in general ACPI initialization flow,
> >> we introduce a weak symbol acpi_arch_init. Currently, arm64 can
> >> utillize this to insert its specific flow. In the future,
> >> other architectures can also have chance to define their own
> >> arch-specific acpi initialization process if necessary.
> >> Signed-off-by: Miao Wang <shankerwangmiao@gmail.com>
> >> Reviewed-by: Sunil V L <sunilvl@ventanamicro.com>
> >> Reviewed-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
> >> ---
> >> Changes from v1
> >> - Change acpi_arch_init from a static inline stub to a weak function
> >>   according to Haijun Guo's advice
> >> ---
> >> Changes from v2:
> >> - Add __init attribute to the weak acpi_arch_init stub
> >> - Link to v2: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240807-intro-acpi-arch-init-v2-1-9231e23a7721@gmail.com
> > 
> > Thanks for the quick update,
> > 
> > Acked-by: Hanjun Guo <guohanjun@huawei.com>
> 
> Hi, all. I wonder whether this patch is good to be applied or
> any improvement is needed.
> 

LGTM. Rafael, do you want to take this via your tree or arm64(need your ack)
once you are happy with the change ?

-- 
Regards,
Sudeep