From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
To: Andrew Jones <ajones@ventanamicro.com>
Cc: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>,
Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@linux.dev>,
Anup Patel <anup@brainfault.org>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@linux.ibm.com>,
Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>,
Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@linux.ibm.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, kvmarm@lists.linux.dev,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, kvm-riscv@lists.infradead.org,
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
James Houghton <jthoughton@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 02/13] KVM: selftests: Return a value from vcpu_get_reg() instead of using an out-param
Date: Thu, 12 Sep 2024 06:49:40 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZuLxIjMT4QzrUaad@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240912-a3894135370bf3fe551ed018@orel>
On Thu, Sep 12, 2024, Andrew Jones wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 11, 2024 at 01:41:47PM GMT, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> > Return a uint64_t from vcpu_get_reg() instead of having the caller provide
> > a pointer to storage, as none of the KVM_GET_ONE_REG usage in KVM selftests
>
> "none of the vcpu_get_reg() usage"
>
> (There is KVM_GET_ONE_REG usage accessing larger registers, but those are
> done through __vcpu_get_reg(). See get-reg-list.c)
Doh, right, which was also part of my reasoning for making the conversion (tests
can use __vcpu_get_reg() if they need to get a larger register).
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-09-12 13:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-09-11 20:41 [PATCH v2 00/13] KVM: selftests: Morph max_guest_mem to mmu_stress Sean Christopherson
2024-09-11 20:41 ` [PATCH v2 01/13] KVM: Move KVM_REG_SIZE() definition to common uAPI header Sean Christopherson
2024-09-11 20:41 ` [PATCH v2 02/13] KVM: selftests: Return a value from vcpu_get_reg() instead of using an out-param Sean Christopherson
2024-09-12 9:11 ` Andrew Jones
2024-09-12 13:49 ` Sean Christopherson [this message]
2024-09-11 20:41 ` [PATCH v2 03/13] KVM: selftests: Fudge around an apparent gcc bug in arm64's PMU test Sean Christopherson
2024-09-30 21:56 ` Sean Christopherson
2024-09-30 22:48 ` Sean Christopherson
2024-09-11 20:41 ` [PATCH v2 04/13] KVM: selftests: Assert that vcpu_{g,s}et_reg() won't truncate Sean Christopherson
2024-09-12 9:41 ` Andrew Jones
2024-09-12 16:17 ` Sean Christopherson
2024-09-11 20:41 ` [PATCH v2 05/13] KVM: selftests: Check for a potential unhandled exception iff KVM_RUN succeeded Sean Christopherson
2024-09-11 20:41 ` [PATCH v2 06/13] KVM: selftests: Rename max_guest_memory_test to mmu_stress_test Sean Christopherson
2024-09-11 20:41 ` [PATCH v2 07/13] KVM: selftests: Only muck with SREGS on x86 in mmu_stress_test Sean Christopherson
2024-09-11 20:41 ` [PATCH v2 08/13] KVM: selftests: Compute number of extra pages needed " Sean Christopherson
2024-09-11 20:41 ` [PATCH v2 09/13] KVM: selftests: Enable mmu_stress_test on arm64 Sean Christopherson
2024-09-11 20:41 ` [PATCH v2 10/13] KVM: selftests: Use vcpu_arch_put_guest() in mmu_stress_test Sean Christopherson
2024-09-11 20:41 ` [PATCH v2 11/13] KVM: selftests: Precisely limit the number of guest loops " Sean Christopherson
2024-09-11 20:41 ` [PATCH v2 12/13] KVM: selftests: Add a read-only mprotect() phase to mmu_stress_test Sean Christopherson
2024-09-11 20:41 ` [PATCH v2 13/13] KVM: selftests: Verify KVM correctly handles mprotect(PROT_READ) Sean Christopherson
2024-09-12 0:19 ` James Houghton
2024-09-12 14:36 ` Sean Christopherson
2024-09-12 11:48 ` [PATCH v2 00/13] KVM: selftests: Morph max_guest_mem to mmu_stress Andrew Jones
2024-09-12 14:03 ` Sean Christopherson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZuLxIjMT4QzrUaad@google.com \
--to=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=ajones@ventanamicro.com \
--cc=anup@brainfault.org \
--cc=borntraeger@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=frankja@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=imbrenda@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=jthoughton@google.com \
--cc=kvm-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kvmarm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=oliver.upton@linux.dev \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).