From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2E450C3ABB2 for ; Mon, 16 Sep 2024 14:16:51 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender:List-Subscribe:List-Help :List-Post:List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:Content-Type: MIME-Version:References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=l1/zxHQ+yGeGnMWRUcdMVmw9o3kbw7MKl5aO3o5xSFA=; b=iU1ZI9chr1sUZmH7r4YsbFtK0o PWglJeMvwiM7ZODBicT5E8WIHSVGi8l59Gyot5yAqinZF3LVKRe+MLJuvd1HVdC/gZc0U7Fds7E+/ 6PXENVBo093V1+k3SjDnucc/JIdKFOeJqr6bQUwfmtqLtTqofZgeJs2m3ALqnVTVdUthdZV/T9xdZ JpN4rKAl96EmXF61CcnmjH3S4PcL/KcUXcAT1jEwwLJjvsUd3Mb8jm8RaA7aXD0cQDZUvZkuqOzRC n8UdnuEbEK3+FGS5inVh4L+BkKVMVmTMFMgmpIxYR6S2x7hpNbhkO8kBULsQ+bxzeOJlxN9jxZHNp yPcONyVQ==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.98 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1sqCWu-00000004ByL-0wUK; Mon, 16 Sep 2024 14:16:40 +0000 Received: from foss.arm.com ([217.140.110.172]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.98 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1sqCUk-00000004BeC-2RDh for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Mon, 16 Sep 2024 14:14:27 +0000 Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 90E6311FB; Mon, 16 Sep 2024 07:14:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pluto (usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com [172.31.20.19]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A27C03F64C; Mon, 16 Sep 2024 07:14:21 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 16 Sep 2024 15:14:08 +0100 From: Cristian Marussi To: Nikunj Kela Cc: Sudeep Holla , Cristian Marussi , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, arm-scmi@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, james.quinlan@broadcom.com, f.fainelli@gmail.com, vincent.guittot@linaro.org, etienne.carriere@st.com, peng.fan@oss.nxp.com, michal.simek@amd.com, quic_sibis@quicinc.com, dan.carpenter@linaro.org, souvik.chakravarty@arm.com, robh@kernel.org, krzk+dt@kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 5/6] firmware: arm_scmi: Use max_msg and max_msg_size from devicetree Message-ID: References: <20240730144707.1647025-1-cristian.marussi@arm.com> <20240730144707.1647025-6-cristian.marussi@arm.com> <34d1783c-8b0d-4337-8169-1c41cd02a6e3@quicinc.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <34d1783c-8b0d-4337-8169-1c41cd02a6e3@quicinc.com> X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20240916_071426_714647_7E310140 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 15.59 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Thu, Sep 12, 2024 at 12:22:48PM -0700, Nikunj Kela wrote: > > On 8/20/2024 7:48 AM, Sudeep Holla wrote: > > On Tue, Jul 30, 2024 at 03:47:06PM +0100, Cristian Marussi wrote: > >> Override max_msg and max_msg_size transport properties when corresponding > >> devicetree properties are available. > >> > > I am holding off on these changes to think how these max_msg and max_msg_size > > can be used without breaking any platforms allowing space for the header > > and the message itself which is around 28 bytes. The binding itself looks > > good. We may have to adjust the value passed to the core driver taking > > the above into consideration. > > > > -- > > Regards, > > Sudeep > Hi Nikunj, these additional patches of initial series was still not reviewed by DT maintainers really and it needed some rework for the reason Sudeep mmentioned above. This is in my soon-ish todo list :P Thanks, Cristian