From: Mostafa Saleh <smostafa@google.com>
To: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
Cc: acpica-devel@lists.linux.dev, Hanjun Guo <guohanjun@huawei.com>,
iommu@lists.linux.dev, Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>,
Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@intel.com>,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>,
linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
Lorenzo Pieralisi <lpieralisi@kernel.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
Robert Moore <robert.moore@intel.com>,
Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>,
Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>,
Eric Auger <eric.auger@redhat.com>,
Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe@linaro.org>,
Moritz Fischer <mdf@kernel.org>,
Michael Shavit <mshavit@google.com>,
Nicolin Chen <nicolinc@nvidia.com>,
patches@lists.linux.dev,
Shameerali Kolothum Thodi <shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/8] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Use S2FWB when available
Date: Tue, 17 Sep 2024 09:48:44 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZulQfG0fnGlABZrR@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240910202251.GJ58321@nvidia.com>
On Tue, Sep 10, 2024 at 05:22:51PM -0300, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 10, 2024 at 10:55:51AM +0000, Mostafa Saleh wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 03, 2024 at 08:33:40PM -0300, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> > > On Tue, Sep 03, 2024 at 07:57:01AM +0000, Mostafa Saleh wrote:
> > >
> > > > Basically, I believe we shouldn’t set FWB blindly just because it’s supported,
> > > > I don’t see how it’s useful for stage-2 only domains.
> > >
> > > And the only problem we can see is some niche scenario where incoming
> > > memory attributes that are already requesting cachable combine to a
> > > different kind of cachable?
> >
> > No, it’s not about the niche scenario, as I mentioned I don’t think
> > we should enable FWB because it just exists. One can argue the opposite,
> > if S2FWB is no different why enable it?
>
> Well, I'd argue that it provides more certainty for the kernel that
> the DMA API behavior is matched by HW behavior. But I don't feel strongly.
>
> I adjusted the patch to only enable it for nesting parents.
>
> > AFAIU, FWB would be useful in cases where the hypervisor(or VMM) knows
> > better than the VM, for example some devices MMIO space are emulated so
> > they are normal memory and it’s more efficient to use memory attributes.
>
> Not quite, the purpose of FWB is to allow the hypervisor to avoid
> costly cache flushing. It is specifically to protect the hypervisor
> against a VM causing the caches to go incoherent.
>
> Caches that are unexpectedly incoherent are a security problem for the
> hypervisor.
I see, thanks for explaining, I got confused about the device emulation case,
it’s also about corruption because of a mismatch of memory attributes,
something like:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1679680
At the moment, I see KVM doesn’t really touch guest memory, but it does CMO for
guest map(in case memslot had already some data) and on unmap, which I
believe has significant performance improvement.
>
> > > > and we should only set FWB for coherent
> > > > devices in nested setup only where the VMM(or hypervisor) knows better than
> > > > the VM.
> > >
> > > I don't want to touch the 'only coherent devices' question. Last time
> > > I tried to do that I got told every option was wrong.
> > >
> > > I would be fine to only enable for nesting parent domains. It is
> > > mandatory here and we definitely don't support non-cachable nesting
> > > today. Can we agree on that?
> >
> > Why is it mandatory?
>
> Because iommufd/vfio doesn't have cache flushing.
>
I see.
> > I think a supporting point for this, is that KVM does the same for
> > the CPU, where it enables FWB for VMs if supported. I have this on
> > my list to study if that can be improved. But may be if we are out
> > of options that would be a start.
>
> When KVM turns on S2FWB it stops doing cache flushing. As I understand
> it S2FWB is significantly a performance optimization.
>
> On the VFIO side we don't have cache flushing at all. So enforcing
> cache consistency is mandatory for security.
>
> For native VFIO we set IOMMU_CACHE and expect that the contract with
> the IOMMU is that no cache flushing is required.
>
> For nested we set S2FWB/CANWBS to prevent the VM from disabling VFIO's
> IOMMU_CACHE and again the contract with the HW is that no cache
> flushing is required.
>
> Thus VFIO is security correct even though it doesn't cache flush.
>
> None of this has anything to do with device coherence capability. It
> is why I keep saying incoherent devices must be blocked from VFIO
> because it cannot operate them securely/correctly.
>
> Fixing that is a whole other topic, Yi has a series for it on x86 at
> least..
I see, that makes sense to only support it for nested domains on
the assumption they are only used for VFIO/IOMMUFD till we figure out
non-coherent devices, I guess you are referring to:
https://lore.kernel.org/all/ZltQ3PyHKiQmN9SU@nvidia.com/t/#me702dd242782393eb7769000c96702a0fed7f6ca
Thanks,
Mostafa
>
> Jason
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-09-17 9:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 95+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-08-27 15:51 [PATCH v2 0/8] Initial support for SMMUv3 nested translation Jason Gunthorpe
2024-08-27 15:51 ` [PATCH v2 1/8] vfio: Remove VFIO_TYPE1_NESTING_IOMMU Jason Gunthorpe
2024-08-30 7:40 ` Tian, Kevin
2024-08-27 15:51 ` [PATCH v2 2/8] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Use S2FWB when available Jason Gunthorpe
2024-08-27 19:48 ` Nicolin Chen
2024-08-28 18:30 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2024-08-28 19:47 ` Nicolin Chen
2024-08-28 19:50 ` Nicolin Chen
2024-08-30 7:44 ` Tian, Kevin
2024-08-30 7:56 ` Nicolin Chen
2024-08-30 8:01 ` Tian, Kevin
2024-08-30 15:12 ` Mostafa Saleh
2024-08-30 16:40 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2024-09-02 9:29 ` Mostafa Saleh
2024-09-03 0:05 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2024-09-03 7:57 ` Mostafa Saleh
2024-09-03 23:33 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2024-09-10 10:55 ` Mostafa Saleh
2024-09-10 20:22 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2024-09-17 9:48 ` Mostafa Saleh [this message]
2024-09-04 14:20 ` Shameerali Kolothum Thodi
2024-09-04 15:00 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2024-09-10 11:25 ` Shameerali Kolothum Thodi
2024-09-11 22:52 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2024-08-27 15:51 ` [PATCH v2 3/8] ACPICA: IORT: Update for revision E.f Jason Gunthorpe
2024-08-29 10:14 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2024-08-27 15:51 ` [PATCH v2 4/8] ACPI/IORT: Support CANWBS memory access flag Jason Gunthorpe
2024-08-30 7:52 ` Tian, Kevin
2024-08-30 13:54 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2024-09-03 7:14 ` Tian, Kevin
2024-08-27 15:51 ` [PATCH v2 5/8] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Report IOMMU_CAP_ENFORCE_CACHE_COHERENCY for CANWBS Jason Gunthorpe
2024-08-27 20:12 ` Nicolin Chen
2024-08-28 19:12 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2024-08-30 15:19 ` Mostafa Saleh
2024-08-30 17:10 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2024-08-27 15:51 ` [PATCH v2 6/8] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Support IOMMU_GET_HW_INFO via struct arm_smmu_hw_info Jason Gunthorpe
2024-08-30 7:55 ` Tian, Kevin
2024-08-30 15:23 ` Mostafa Saleh
2024-08-30 17:16 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2024-09-02 10:11 ` Mostafa Saleh
2024-09-03 0:16 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2024-09-03 8:34 ` Mostafa Saleh
2024-09-03 23:40 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2024-09-04 7:11 ` Shameerali Kolothum Thodi
2024-09-04 12:01 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2024-09-06 11:19 ` Mostafa Saleh
2024-08-27 15:51 ` [PATCH v2 7/8] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Implement IOMMU_HWPT_ALLOC_NEST_PARENT Jason Gunthorpe
2024-08-27 20:16 ` Nicolin Chen
2024-08-30 7:58 ` Tian, Kevin
2024-08-30 13:55 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2024-08-30 15:27 ` Mostafa Saleh
2024-08-30 17:18 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2024-09-02 8:57 ` Mostafa Saleh
2024-08-27 15:51 ` [PATCH v2 8/8] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Support IOMMU_DOMAIN_NESTED Jason Gunthorpe
2024-08-27 21:23 ` Nicolin Chen
2024-08-28 19:01 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2024-08-28 19:27 ` Nicolin Chen
2024-08-30 8:16 ` Tian, Kevin
2024-08-30 14:13 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2024-08-30 14:39 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2024-08-30 16:09 ` Mostafa Saleh
2024-08-30 16:59 ` Nicolin Chen
2024-08-30 17:04 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2024-09-02 9:57 ` Mostafa Saleh
2024-09-03 0:30 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2024-09-03 1:13 ` Nicolin Chen
2024-09-03 9:00 ` Mostafa Saleh
2024-09-03 23:55 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2024-09-06 11:07 ` Mostafa Saleh
2024-09-06 13:34 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2024-09-10 11:12 ` Mostafa Saleh
2024-09-15 21:39 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2024-09-06 18:28 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2024-09-06 18:49 ` Nicolin Chen
2024-09-06 23:15 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2024-08-27 21:31 ` [PATCH v2 0/8] Initial support for SMMUv3 nested translation Nicolin Chen
2024-08-28 16:31 ` Shameerali Kolothum Thodi
2024-08-28 17:14 ` Nicolin Chen
2024-08-28 18:06 ` Shameerali Kolothum Thodi
2024-08-28 18:12 ` Nicolin Chen
2024-08-29 13:14 ` Shameerali Kolothum Thodi
2024-08-29 14:52 ` Shameerali Kolothum Thodi
2024-08-29 16:10 ` Nicolin Chen
2024-08-30 9:07 ` Shameerali Kolothum Thodi
2024-08-30 17:01 ` Nicolin Chen
2024-09-12 3:42 ` Zhangfei Gao
2024-09-12 4:05 ` Nicolin Chen
2024-09-12 4:25 ` Baolu Lu
2024-09-12 7:32 ` Zhangfei Gao
2024-10-15 3:21 ` Zhangfei Gao
2024-10-15 13:09 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2024-10-17 1:53 ` Zhangfei Gao
2024-10-17 11:57 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2024-10-16 2:23 ` Zhangfei Gao
2024-10-16 11:53 ` Jason Gunthorpe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZulQfG0fnGlABZrR@google.com \
--to=smostafa@google.com \
--cc=acpica-devel@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
--cc=eric.auger@redhat.com \
--cc=guohanjun@huawei.com \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=jean-philippe@linaro.org \
--cc=jgg@nvidia.com \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=kevin.tian@intel.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lenb@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=lpieralisi@kernel.org \
--cc=mdf@kernel.org \
--cc=mshavit@google.com \
--cc=nicolinc@nvidia.com \
--cc=patches@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=robert.moore@intel.com \
--cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
--cc=shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com \
--cc=sudeep.holla@arm.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).