linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
To: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>,
	Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@linux.dev>,
	 Anup Patel <anup@brainfault.org>,
	Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	 Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@linux.ibm.com>,
	Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>,
	 Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@linux.ibm.com>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,  kvmarm@lists.linux.dev,
	kvm@vger.kernel.org, kvm-riscv@lists.infradead.org,
	 linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	 James Houghton <jthoughton@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 03/13] KVM: selftests: Fudge around an apparent gcc bug in arm64's PMU test
Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2024 14:56:49 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZvseoZLzmaS4MEbc@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240911204158.2034295-4-seanjc@google.com>

On Wed, Sep 11, 2024, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> Use u64_replace_bits() instead of u64p_replace_bits() to set PMCR.N in
> arm64's vPMU counter access test to fudge around what appears to be a gcc
> bug.  With the recent change to have vcpu_get_reg() return a value in lieu
> of an out-param, some versions of gcc completely ignore the operation
> performed by set_pmcr_n(), i.e. ignore the output param.

Filed a gcc bug: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116912

I'll report back if anything interesting comes out of that bug.


  reply	other threads:[~2024-09-30 21:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-09-11 20:41 [PATCH v2 00/13] KVM: selftests: Morph max_guest_mem to mmu_stress Sean Christopherson
2024-09-11 20:41 ` [PATCH v2 01/13] KVM: Move KVM_REG_SIZE() definition to common uAPI header Sean Christopherson
2024-09-11 20:41 ` [PATCH v2 02/13] KVM: selftests: Return a value from vcpu_get_reg() instead of using an out-param Sean Christopherson
2024-09-12  9:11   ` Andrew Jones
2024-09-12 13:49     ` Sean Christopherson
2024-09-11 20:41 ` [PATCH v2 03/13] KVM: selftests: Fudge around an apparent gcc bug in arm64's PMU test Sean Christopherson
2024-09-30 21:56   ` Sean Christopherson [this message]
2024-09-30 22:48     ` Sean Christopherson
2024-09-11 20:41 ` [PATCH v2 04/13] KVM: selftests: Assert that vcpu_{g,s}et_reg() won't truncate Sean Christopherson
2024-09-12  9:41   ` Andrew Jones
2024-09-12 16:17     ` Sean Christopherson
2024-09-11 20:41 ` [PATCH v2 05/13] KVM: selftests: Check for a potential unhandled exception iff KVM_RUN succeeded Sean Christopherson
2024-09-11 20:41 ` [PATCH v2 06/13] KVM: selftests: Rename max_guest_memory_test to mmu_stress_test Sean Christopherson
2024-09-11 20:41 ` [PATCH v2 07/13] KVM: selftests: Only muck with SREGS on x86 in mmu_stress_test Sean Christopherson
2024-09-11 20:41 ` [PATCH v2 08/13] KVM: selftests: Compute number of extra pages needed " Sean Christopherson
2024-09-11 20:41 ` [PATCH v2 09/13] KVM: selftests: Enable mmu_stress_test on arm64 Sean Christopherson
2024-09-11 20:41 ` [PATCH v2 10/13] KVM: selftests: Use vcpu_arch_put_guest() in mmu_stress_test Sean Christopherson
2024-09-11 20:41 ` [PATCH v2 11/13] KVM: selftests: Precisely limit the number of guest loops " Sean Christopherson
2024-09-11 20:41 ` [PATCH v2 12/13] KVM: selftests: Add a read-only mprotect() phase to mmu_stress_test Sean Christopherson
2024-09-11 20:41 ` [PATCH v2 13/13] KVM: selftests: Verify KVM correctly handles mprotect(PROT_READ) Sean Christopherson
2024-09-12  0:19   ` James Houghton
2024-09-12 14:36     ` Sean Christopherson
2024-09-12 11:48 ` [PATCH v2 00/13] KVM: selftests: Morph max_guest_mem to mmu_stress Andrew Jones
2024-09-12 14:03   ` Sean Christopherson

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ZvseoZLzmaS4MEbc@google.com \
    --to=seanjc@google.com \
    --cc=anup@brainfault.org \
    --cc=borntraeger@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=frankja@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=imbrenda@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=jthoughton@google.com \
    --cc=kvm-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=kvmarm@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=maz@kernel.org \
    --cc=oliver.upton@linux.dev \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).