From: Nicolin Chen <nicolinc@nvidia.com>
To: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>, <kevin.tian@intel.com>
Cc: Zhangfei Gao <zhangfei.gao@linaro.org>, <will@kernel.org>,
<joro@8bytes.org>, <suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com>,
<robin.murphy@arm.com>, <dwmw2@infradead.org>,
<baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>, <shuah@kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <iommu@lists.linux.dev>,
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
<linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org>, <eric.auger@redhat.com>,
<jean-philippe@linaro.org>, <mdf@kernel.org>,
<mshavit@google.com>, <shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com>,
<smostafa@google.com>, <yi.l.liu@intel.com>, <aik@amd.com>,
<patches@lists.linux.dev>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 06/13] iommufd: Allow pt_id to carry viommu_id for IOMMU_HWPT_ALLOC
Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2024 14:08:23 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Zx/9R5o59B2knsx6@Asurada-Nvidia> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Zx+lGr9iD4DSkc8I@Asurada-Nvidia>
On Mon, Oct 28, 2024 at 07:52:10AM -0700, Nicolin Chen wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 28, 2024 at 10:03:09AM -0300, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 28, 2024 at 11:24:10AM +0800, Zhangfei Gao wrote:
> >
> > > > +/**
> > > > + * iommufd_viommu_alloc_hwpt_nested() - Get a hwpt_nested for a vIOMMU
> > > > + * @viommu: vIOMMU ojbect to associate the hwpt_nested/domain with
> > > > + * @user_data: user_data pointer. Must be valid
> > > > + *
> > > > + * Allocate a new IOMMU_DOMAIN_NESTED for a vIOMMU and return it as a NESTED
> > > > + * hw_pagetable.
> > > > + */
> > > > +static struct iommufd_hwpt_nested *
> > > > +iommufd_viommu_alloc_hwpt_nested(struct iommufd_viommu *viommu, u32 flags,
> > > > + const struct iommu_user_data *user_data)
> > > > +{
> > > > + struct iommufd_hwpt_nested *hwpt_nested;
> > > > + struct iommufd_hw_pagetable *hwpt;
> > > > + int rc;
> > > > +
> > > > + if (flags)
> > > > + return ERR_PTR(-EOPNOTSUPP);
> > >
> > > This check should be removed.
> > >
> > > When a user page fault is required, IOMMU_HWPT_FAULT_ID_VALID is set.
> > > if (cmd->flags & IOMMU_HWPT_FAULT_ID_VALID) {
> >
> > It can't just be removed..
> >
> > I suspect that IOMMU_HWPT_FAULT_ID_VALID should not be set on the
> > nested domain but on the parent?
>
> By giving another look,
>
> In iommufd_hwpt_paging_alloc(), we reject IOMMU_HWPT_FAULT_ID_VALID:
> const u32 valid_flags = IOMMU_HWPT_ALLOC_NEST_PARENT |
> IOMMU_HWPT_ALLOC_DIRTY_TRACKING;
> ...
> if (flags & ~valid_flags)
> return ERR_PTR(-EOPNOTSUPP);
>
> In iommufd_hwpt_nested_alloc(), we mask the flag away:
> if ((flags & ~IOMMU_HWPT_FAULT_ID_VALID) ||
> !user_data->len || !ops->domain_alloc_user)
> return ERR_PTR(-EOPNOTSUPP);
> ...
> hwpt->domain = ops->domain_alloc_user(idev->dev,
> flags & ~IOMMU_HWPT_FAULT_ID_VALID,
> parent->common.domain, user_data);
>
> Then, in the common function it has a section of
> if (cmd->flags & IOMMU_HWPT_FAULT_ID_VALID) {
> ...
>
> It seems that this IOMMU_HWPT_FAULT_ID_VALID is for nested domains?
>
> So, aligning with that, here we need:
> if ((flags & ~IOMMU_HWPT_FAULT_ID_VALID) || !user_data->len)
> return ERR_PTR(-EOPNOTSUPP);
I added a TEST_F for the coverage:
+TEST_F(iommufd_viommu, viommu_alloc_nested_iopf)
+{
+ struct iommu_hwpt_selftest data = {
+ .iotlb = IOMMU_TEST_IOTLB_DEFAULT,
+ };
+ uint32_t viommu_id = self->viommu_id;
+ uint32_t dev_id = self->device_id;
+ uint32_t iopf_hwpt_id;
+ uint32_t fault_id;
+ uint32_t fault_fd;
+
+ if (self->device_id) {
+ test_ioctl_fault_alloc(&fault_id, &fault_fd);
+ test_err_hwpt_alloc_iopf(
+ ENOENT, dev_id, viommu_id, UINT32_MAX,
+ IOMMU_HWPT_FAULT_ID_VALID, &iopf_hwpt_id,
+ IOMMU_HWPT_DATA_SELFTEST, &data, sizeof(data));
+ test_err_hwpt_alloc_iopf(
+ EOPNOTSUPP, dev_id, viommu_id, fault_id,
+ IOMMU_HWPT_FAULT_ID_VALID | (1 << 31), &iopf_hwpt_id,
+ IOMMU_HWPT_DATA_SELFTEST, &data, sizeof(data));
+ test_cmd_hwpt_alloc_iopf(
+ dev_id, viommu_id, fault_id, IOMMU_HWPT_FAULT_ID_VALID,
+ &iopf_hwpt_id, IOMMU_HWPT_DATA_SELFTEST, &data,
+ sizeof(data));
+
+ test_cmd_mock_domain_replace(self->stdev_id, iopf_hwpt_id);
+ EXPECT_ERRNO(EBUSY,
+ _test_ioctl_destroy(self->fd, iopf_hwpt_id));
+ test_cmd_trigger_iopf(dev_id, fault_fd);
+
+ test_cmd_mock_domain_replace(self->stdev_id, self->ioas_id);
+ test_ioctl_destroy(iopf_hwpt_id);
+ close(fault_fd);
+ test_ioctl_destroy(fault_id);
+ }
+}
Thanks
Nicolin
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-10-28 21:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 53+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-10-25 23:49 [PATCH v5 00/13] iommufd: Add vIOMMU infrastructure (Part-1) Nicolin Chen
2024-10-25 23:49 ` [PATCH v5 01/13] iommufd: Move struct iommufd_object to public iommufd header Nicolin Chen
2024-10-25 23:49 ` [PATCH v5 02/13] iommufd: Introduce IOMMUFD_OBJ_VIOMMU and its related struct Nicolin Chen
2024-10-28 2:41 ` Tian, Kevin
2024-10-29 14:42 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2024-10-25 23:49 ` [PATCH v5 03/13] iommufd: Add iommufd_verify_unfinalized_object Nicolin Chen
2024-10-29 14:49 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2024-10-29 16:18 ` Nicolin Chen
2024-10-29 18:55 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2024-10-29 19:32 ` Nicolin Chen
2024-10-30 4:05 ` Nicolin Chen
2024-10-30 12:53 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2024-10-25 23:49 ` [PATCH v5 04/13] iommufd/viommu: Add IOMMU_VIOMMU_ALLOC ioctl Nicolin Chen
2024-10-28 2:43 ` Tian, Kevin
2024-10-29 14:54 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2024-10-29 15:36 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2024-10-29 15:46 ` Nicolin Chen
2024-10-29 15:59 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2024-10-29 16:03 ` Nicolin Chen
2024-10-29 15:37 ` Nicolin Chen
2024-10-25 23:49 ` [PATCH v5 05/13] iommufd: Add alloc_domain_nested op to iommufd_viommu_ops Nicolin Chen
2024-10-29 15:25 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2024-10-25 23:49 ` [PATCH v5 06/13] iommufd: Allow pt_id to carry viommu_id for IOMMU_HWPT_ALLOC Nicolin Chen
2024-10-28 2:46 ` Tian, Kevin
2024-10-28 3:24 ` Zhangfei Gao
2024-10-28 13:03 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2024-10-28 14:52 ` Nicolin Chen
2024-10-28 21:08 ` Nicolin Chen [this message]
2024-10-29 15:27 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2024-10-29 16:07 ` Nicolin Chen
2024-10-29 18:53 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2024-10-28 14:53 ` Zhangfei Gao
2024-10-28 15:01 ` Nicolin Chen
2024-10-25 23:49 ` [PATCH v5 07/13] iommufd/selftest: Add container_of helpers Nicolin Chen
2024-10-28 2:46 ` Tian, Kevin
2024-10-29 15:28 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2024-10-25 23:49 ` [PATCH v5 08/13] iommufd/selftest: Prepare for mock_viommu_alloc_domain_nested() Nicolin Chen
2024-10-28 2:48 ` Tian, Kevin
2024-10-29 15:30 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2024-10-25 23:49 ` [PATCH v5 09/13] iommufd/selftest: Add refcount to mock_iommu_device Nicolin Chen
2024-10-28 2:49 ` Tian, Kevin
2024-10-29 15:34 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2024-10-29 16:02 ` Nicolin Chen
2024-10-29 18:53 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2024-10-25 23:49 ` [PATCH v5 10/13] iommufd/selftest: Add IOMMU_VIOMMU_TYPE_SELFTEST Nicolin Chen
2024-10-28 2:51 ` Tian, Kevin
2024-10-29 15:41 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2024-10-25 23:49 ` [PATCH v5 11/13] iommufd/selftest: Add IOMMU_VIOMMU_ALLOC test coverage Nicolin Chen
2024-10-28 2:52 ` Tian, Kevin
2024-10-25 23:49 ` [PATCH v5 12/13] Documentation: userspace-api: iommufd: Update vIOMMU Nicolin Chen
2024-10-30 6:16 ` Nicolin Chen
2024-10-25 23:49 ` [PATCH v5 13/13] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Add IOMMU_VIOMMU_TYPE_ARM_SMMUV3 support Nicolin Chen
2024-10-28 2:54 ` Tian, Kevin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Zx/9R5o59B2knsx6@Asurada-Nvidia \
--to=nicolinc@nvidia.com \
--cc=aik@amd.com \
--cc=baolu.lu@linux.intel.com \
--cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
--cc=eric.auger@redhat.com \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=jean-philippe@linaro.org \
--cc=jgg@nvidia.com \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=kevin.tian@intel.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mdf@kernel.org \
--cc=mshavit@google.com \
--cc=patches@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
--cc=shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=smostafa@google.com \
--cc=suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=yi.l.liu@intel.com \
--cc=zhangfei.gao@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox