From: Beata Michalska <beata.michalska@arm.com>
To: viresh.kumar@linaro.org, rafael@kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org,
ionela.voinescu@arm.com, catalin.marinas@arm.com,
sudeep.holla@arm.com, will@kernel.org, sumitg@nvidia.com,
yang@os.amperecomputing.com, vanshikonda@os.amperecomputing.com,
lihuisong@huawei.com, zhanjie9@hisilicon.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 0/4] Add support for AArch64 AMUv1-based average freq
Date: Sun, 27 Oct 2024 19:16:56 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Zx6DmCBYQZkLWRhf@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ZxAnbflwMuIWpKCW@arm.com>
On Wed, Oct 16, 2024 at 10:51:57PM +0200, Beata Michalska wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 16, 2024 at 11:59:25AM +0100, Catalin Marinas wrote:
Hi Viresh,
Hi Rafael,
> Hi Catalin,
> > Hi Beata,
> >
> > On Fri, Sep 13, 2024 at 02:29:40PM +0100, Beata Michalska wrote:
> > > This series adds support for obtaining an average CPU frequency based on
> > > a hardware provided feedback. The average frequency is being exposed via
> > > dedicated yet optional cpufreq sysfs attribute - cpuinfo_avg_freq.
> > > The architecture specific bits are being provided for AArch64, caching on
> > > existing implementation for FIE and AMUv1 support: the frequency scale
> > > factor, updated on each sched tick, serving as a base for retrieving
> > > the frequency for a given CPU, representing an average frequency
> > > reported between the ticks.
> > >
> > > The changes have been rather lightly (due to some limitations) tested on
> > > an FVP model. Note that some small discrepancies have been observed while
> > > testing (on the model) and this is currently being investigated, though it
> > > should not have any significant impact on the overall results.
> > >
> > > Note that [PATCH 2/4] arm64: amu: Delay allocating cpumask for AMU FIE support
> > > can be merged independently.
> >
> > What's the plan with the rest of the patches? Are you going to respin?
> > The first patch would need an ack from Rafael or Viresh if we are to
> > merge them via the arm64 tree.
> >
> I am still waiting on any feedback on [PATCH 1/4] - changes to cpufreq, as that
> one drives the changes in arch specific bits. There is also an ongoing discussion
> on how to handle idle cpu cases - so I would say we still need to agree on few
> details.
Would really appreciate your feedback on above mentioned [PATCH 1/4] -> [1]
as well as the discussion at [2].
Thank you.
---
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240913132944.1880703-2-beata.michalska@arm.com/
[2] https://lore.kernel.org/all/ZxAl77IYcMO2SfWh@arm.com/
---
>
> ---
> BR
> Beata
> > Thanks.
> >
> > --
> > Catalin
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-10-27 18:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-09-13 13:29 [PATCH v7 0/4] Add support for AArch64 AMUv1-based average freq Beata Michalska
2024-09-13 13:29 ` [PATCH v7 1/4] cpufreq: Introduce an optional cpuinfo_avg_freq sysfs entry Beata Michalska
2024-09-25 8:58 ` Jie Zhan
2024-09-26 10:42 ` Beata Michalska
2024-10-29 7:04 ` Viresh Kumar
2024-10-29 11:31 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2024-11-04 8:01 ` Beata Michalska
2024-11-04 13:26 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2024-11-04 8:00 ` Beata Michalska
2024-11-08 6:28 ` Viresh Kumar
2024-09-13 13:29 ` [PATCH v7 2/4] arm64: amu: Delay allocating cpumask for AMU FIE support Beata Michalska
2024-09-13 13:29 ` [PATCH v7 3/4] arm64: Provide an AMU-based version of arch_freq_avg_get_on_cpu Beata Michalska
2024-09-17 12:11 ` Sumit Gupta
2024-09-26 10:34 ` Beata Michalska
2024-09-26 23:21 ` Vanshidhar Konda
2024-10-03 21:39 ` Beata Michalska
2024-10-03 21:54 ` Vanshidhar Konda
2024-10-10 11:08 ` Beata Michalska
2024-10-11 16:29 ` Vanshidhar Konda
2024-10-14 17:46 ` Sumit Gupta
2024-10-16 20:45 ` Beata Michalska
2024-10-29 6:53 ` Viresh Kumar
2024-11-04 7:58 ` Beata Michalska
2024-09-13 13:29 ` [PATCH v7 4/4] arm64: Update AMU-based freq scale factor on entering idle Beata Michalska
2024-10-16 10:59 ` [PATCH v7 0/4] Add support for AArch64 AMUv1-based average freq Catalin Marinas
2024-10-16 20:51 ` Beata Michalska
2024-10-27 18:16 ` Beata Michalska [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Zx6DmCBYQZkLWRhf@arm.com \
--to=beata.michalska@arm.com \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=ionela.voinescu@arm.com \
--cc=lihuisong@huawei.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=sudeep.holla@arm.com \
--cc=sumitg@nvidia.com \
--cc=vanshikonda@os.amperecomputing.com \
--cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=yang@os.amperecomputing.com \
--cc=zhanjie9@hisilicon.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).