From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
To: Lorenzo Stoakes <lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com>
Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
"Liam R. Howlett" <Liam.Howlett@oracle.com>,
Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Jann Horn <jannh@google.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
Aishwarya TCV <Aishwarya.TCV@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH hotfix 6.12 v2 4/8] mm: resolve faulty mmap_region() error path behaviour
Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2024 15:04:41 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZyD5iXikMzotl9mU@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cf1deb9b-c5c4-4e85-891d-62ecf9a04e0f@lucifer.local>
Hi Lorenzo,
Thanks for trying to fix this.
On Mon, Oct 28, 2024 at 10:14:50PM +0000, Lorenzo Stoakes wrote:
> From 247003cd2a4b5f4fc2dac97f5ef7e473a47f4324 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Lorenzo Stoakes <lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com>
> Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2024 22:05:44 +0000
> Subject: [PATCH] mm: perform MTE check within arm64 hook entirely
>
> It doesn't make sense to have shmem explicitly check this one arch-specific
> case, it is arch-specific, so the arch should handle it. We know shmem is a
> case in which we want to permit MTE, so simply check for this directly.
>
> This also fixes the issue with checking arch_validate_flags() early, which
> would otherwise break mmap_region().
>
> In order to implement this we must pass a file pointer, and additionally
> update the sparc code to accept this parameter too.
>
> We'd ideally like to have eliminated the arch_calc_vm_flag_bits() case, but
> we risk inadvertently changing behaviour as we do not have mmap() flags
> available at the point of the arch_validate_flags() check and a MAP_ANON |
> MAP_HUGETLB case would be accepted for MTE currently, but a MAP_SHARED |
> MAP_HUGETLB would not.
>
> This is likely an oversight but we want to try to keep behaviour identical
> to before in this patch.
MAP_HUGETLB support for MTE is only in -next currently, so there
wouldn't be any ABI change if we also allowed MAP_SHARED | MAP_HUGETLB.
In 6.12, MAP_HUGETLB is not allowed to have PROT_MTE.
> So continue to check VM_MTE_ALLOWED which arch_calc_vm_flag_bits() sets if
> MAP_ANON.
[...]
> diff --git a/mm/shmem.c b/mm/shmem.c
> index 4ba1d00fabda..e87f5d6799a7 100644
> --- a/mm/shmem.c
> +++ b/mm/shmem.c
> @@ -2733,9 +2733,6 @@ static int shmem_mmap(struct file *file, struct vm_area_struct *vma)
> if (ret)
> return ret;
>
> - /* arm64 - allow memory tagging on RAM-based files */
> - vm_flags_set(vma, VM_MTE_ALLOWED);
This breaks arm64 KVM if the VMM uses shared mappings for the memory
slots (which is possible). We have kvm_vma_mte_allowed() that checks for
the VM_MTE_ALLOWED flag as the VMM may not use PROT_MTE/VM_MTE directly.
I need to read this thread properly but why not pass the file argument
to arch_calc_vm_flag_bits() and set VM_MTE_ALLOWED in there?
--
Catalin
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-10-29 15:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <cover.1729715266.git.lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com>
[not found] ` <6e8deda970b982e1e8ffd876e3cef342c292fbb5.1729715266.git.lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com>
2024-10-28 18:29 ` [PATCH hotfix 6.12 v2 4/8] mm: resolve faulty mmap_region() error path behaviour Mark Brown
2024-10-28 18:57 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2024-10-28 19:05 ` Linus Torvalds
2024-10-28 19:14 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2024-10-28 19:50 ` Liam R. Howlett
2024-10-28 20:00 ` Liam R. Howlett
2024-10-28 20:17 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2024-10-28 20:22 ` Linus Torvalds
2024-10-28 20:43 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2024-10-28 21:04 ` Liam R. Howlett
2024-10-28 21:05 ` Mark Brown
2024-10-28 21:28 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2024-10-28 21:00 ` Vlastimil Babka
2024-10-28 21:19 ` Linus Torvalds
2024-10-28 21:28 ` Vlastimil Babka
2024-10-28 22:14 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2024-10-29 7:50 ` Vlastimil Babka
2024-10-29 10:23 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2024-10-29 12:33 ` Mark Brown
2024-10-29 12:41 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2024-10-29 15:04 ` Catalin Marinas [this message]
2024-10-29 15:16 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2024-10-29 16:22 ` Catalin Marinas
2024-10-29 16:36 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2024-10-29 17:02 ` Catalin Marinas
2024-10-29 17:28 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2024-10-29 17:32 ` Catalin Marinas
2024-10-28 20:51 ` Mark Brown
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZyD5iXikMzotl9mU@arm.com \
--to=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=Aishwarya.TCV@arm.com \
--cc=Liam.Howlett@oracle.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=jannh@google.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com \
--cc=peterx@redhat.com \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).