From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
To: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>, Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>,
Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@linux.dev>,
James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>,
Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
Zenghui Yu <yuzenghui@huawei.com>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
Lorenzo Pieralisi <lpieralisi@kernel.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>, Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>,
Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>,
David Woodhouse <dwmw@amazon.co.uk>,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, kvmarm@lists.linux.dev,
linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,
Francesco Lavra <francescolavra.fl@gmail.com>,
Miguel Luis <miguel.luis@oracle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 6/6] arm64: Use SYSTEM_OFF2 PSCI call to power off for hibernate
Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2024 12:16:16 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZyN1EMPCjdX7zZSB@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241019172459.2241939-7-dwmw2@infradead.org>
On Sat, Oct 19, 2024 at 06:15:47PM +0100, David Woodhouse wrote:
> From: David Woodhouse <dwmw@amazon.co.uk>
>
> The PSCI v1.3 specification adds support for a SYSTEM_OFF2 function
> which is analogous to ACPI S4 state. This will allow hosting
> environments to determine that a guest is hibernated rather than just
> powered off, and handle that state appropriately on subsequent launches.
>
> Since commit 60c0d45a7f7a ("efi/arm64: use UEFI for system reset and
> poweroff") the EFI shutdown method is deliberately preferred over PSCI
> or other methods. So register a SYS_OFF_MODE_POWER_OFF handler which
> *only* handles the hibernation, leaving the original PSCI SYSTEM_OFF as
> a last resort via the legacy pm_power_off function pointer.
>
> The hibernation code already exports a system_entering_hibernation()
> function which is be used by the higher-priority handler to check for
> hibernation. That existing function just returns the value of a static
> boolean variable from hibernate.c, which was previously only set in the
> hibernation_platform_enter() code path. Set the same flag in the simpler
> code path around the call to kernel_power_off() too.
>
> An alternative way to hook SYSTEM_OFF2 into the hibernation code would
> be to register a platform_hibernation_ops structure with an ->enter()
> method which makes the new SYSTEM_OFF2 call. But that would have the
> unwanted side-effect of making hibernation take a completely different
> code path in hibernation_platform_enter(), invoking a lot of special dpm
> callbacks.
>
> Another option might be to add a new SYS_OFF_MODE_HIBERNATE mode, with
> fallback to SYS_OFF_MODE_POWER_OFF. Or to use the sys_off_data to
> indicate whether the power off is for hibernation.
>
> But this version works and is relatively simple.
>
> Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <dwmw@amazon.co.uk>
> Acked-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-10-31 12:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-10-19 17:15 [PATCH v6 0/6] Add PSCI v1.3 SYSTEM_OFF2 support for hibernation David Woodhouse
2024-10-19 17:15 ` [PATCH v6 1/6] firmware/psci: Add definitions for PSCI v1.3 specification David Woodhouse
2024-10-23 15:31 ` Miguel Luis
2024-10-19 17:15 ` [PATCH v6 2/6] KVM: arm64: Add PSCI v1.3 SYSTEM_OFF2 function for hibernation David Woodhouse
2024-10-23 16:02 ` Miguel Luis
2024-10-19 17:15 ` [PATCH v6 3/6] KVM: arm64: Add support for PSCI v1.2 and v1.3 David Woodhouse
2024-10-23 16:21 ` Miguel Luis
2024-10-19 17:15 ` [PATCH v6 4/6] KVM: selftests: Add test for PSCI SYSTEM_OFF2 David Woodhouse
2024-10-19 17:15 ` [PATCH v6 5/6] KVM: arm64: nvhe: Pass through PSCI v1.3 SYSTEM_OFF2 call David Woodhouse
2024-10-24 10:42 ` Miguel Luis
2024-10-19 17:15 ` [PATCH v6 6/6] arm64: Use SYSTEM_OFF2 PSCI call to power off for hibernate David Woodhouse
2024-10-24 12:54 ` Miguel Luis
2024-10-24 13:48 ` David Woodhouse
2024-10-24 15:44 ` Oliver Upton
2024-10-24 15:56 ` David Woodhouse
2024-10-24 19:57 ` Oliver Upton
2024-10-25 6:13 ` David Woodhouse
2024-10-25 20:40 ` Oliver Upton
2024-10-31 18:00 ` David Woodhouse
2024-10-31 12:16 ` Catalin Marinas [this message]
2024-10-31 17:55 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2024-11-01 17:48 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2024-11-04 13:54 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2024-11-04 15:11 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2024-10-25 22:12 ` (subset) [PATCH v6 0/6] Add PSCI v1.3 SYSTEM_OFF2 support for hibernation Oliver Upton
2024-10-31 12:15 ` Catalin Marinas
2024-10-31 17:18 ` David Woodhouse
2024-10-31 17:56 ` Oliver Upton
2024-10-31 18:01 ` David Woodhouse
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZyN1EMPCjdX7zZSB@arm.com \
--to=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
--cc=dwmw@amazon.co.uk \
--cc=francescolavra.fl@gmail.com \
--cc=james.morse@arm.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kvmarm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=len.brown@intel.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lpieralisi@kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=miguel.luis@oracle.com \
--cc=oliver.upton@linux.dev \
--cc=pavel@ucw.cz \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=yuzenghui@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).