From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
To: Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@linux.dev>
Cc: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>, Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>,
Anup Patel <anup@brainfault.org>,
Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@sifive.com>,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com>,
Albert Ou <aou@eecs.berkeley.edu>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@linux.ibm.com>,
Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>,
Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@linux.ibm.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, kvmarm@lists.linux.dev,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, kvm-riscv@lists.infradead.org,
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Andrew Jones <ajones@ventanamicro.com>,
James Houghton <jthoughton@google.com>,
David Woodhouse <dwmw@amazon.co.uk>,
linux-next@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 03/14] KVM: selftests: Return a value from vcpu_get_reg() instead of using an out-param
Date: Fri, 1 Nov 2024 09:16:42 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZyT-6iCNlA1VSAV3@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ZyT9rSnLcDWkWoL_@linux.dev>
On Fri, Nov 01, 2024, Oliver Upton wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 01, 2024 at 08:59:16AM -0700, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> > > Can you instead just push out a topic branch and let the affected
> > > maintainers deal with it? This is the usual way we handle conflicts
> > > between trees...
> >
> > That'd work too, but as you note below, doing that now throws a wrench in things
> > because essentially all arch maintainers would need merge that topic branch,
> > otherwise linux-next would end up in the same state.
>
> TBH, I'm quite happy with that. Recent history has not been particularly
> convinincing to me that folks are actually testing arm64, let alone
> compiling for it when applying selftests patches.
FWIW, I did compile all patches on all KVM architectures, including selftests.
But my base obviously didn't include the kvm-arm64 branch :-/
One thing I'll add to my workflow would be to do a local merge (and smoke test)
of linux-next into kvm-x86 next before pushing it out. This isn't the only snafu
this cycle where such a sanity check would have saved me and others a bit of pain.
https://lore.kernel.org/all/20241101153857.GAZyT2EdLXKs7ZmDFx@fat_crate.local
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-11-01 16:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-10-09 15:49 [PATCH v3 00/14] KVM: selftests: Morph max_guest_mem to mmu_stress Sean Christopherson
2024-10-09 15:49 ` [PATCH v3 01/14] KVM: Move KVM_REG_SIZE() definition to common uAPI header Sean Christopherson
2024-10-10 11:41 ` Anup Patel
2024-10-09 15:49 ` [PATCH v3 02/14] KVM: selftests: Disable strict aliasing Sean Christopherson
2024-10-09 15:49 ` [PATCH v3 03/14] KVM: selftests: Return a value from vcpu_get_reg() instead of using an out-param Sean Christopherson
2024-11-01 13:07 ` Mark Brown
2024-11-01 14:48 ` Sean Christopherson
2024-11-01 15:38 ` Oliver Upton
2024-11-01 15:59 ` Sean Christopherson
2024-11-01 16:11 ` Oliver Upton
2024-11-01 16:16 ` Sean Christopherson [this message]
2024-11-01 16:22 ` Oliver Upton
2024-11-01 16:31 ` Sean Christopherson
2024-11-01 16:37 ` Mark Brown
2024-10-09 15:49 ` [PATCH v3 04/14] KVM: selftests: Assert that vcpu_{g,s}et_reg() won't truncate Sean Christopherson
2024-10-09 15:49 ` [PATCH v3 05/14] KVM: selftests: Check for a potential unhandled exception iff KVM_RUN succeeded Sean Christopherson
2024-10-09 15:49 ` [PATCH v3 06/14] KVM: selftests: Rename max_guest_memory_test to mmu_stress_test Sean Christopherson
2024-10-09 15:49 ` [PATCH v3 07/14] KVM: selftests: Only muck with SREGS on x86 in mmu_stress_test Sean Christopherson
2024-10-09 15:49 ` [PATCH v3 08/14] KVM: selftests: Compute number of extra pages needed " Sean Christopherson
2024-10-09 15:49 ` [PATCH v3 09/14] KVM: sefltests: Explicitly include ucall_common.h in mmu_stress_test.c Sean Christopherson
[not found] ` <CADrL8HUEwnP8e700y2XYDgVhhUJuj1UEJmd2NLdtZ1dV845DNw@mail.gmail.com>
2024-10-28 20:45 ` Sean Christopherson
2024-10-09 15:49 ` [PATCH v3 10/14] KVM: selftests: Enable mmu_stress_test on arm64 Sean Christopherson
2024-10-09 15:49 ` [PATCH v3 11/14] KVM: selftests: Use vcpu_arch_put_guest() in mmu_stress_test Sean Christopherson
2024-10-09 15:49 ` [PATCH v3 12/14] KVM: selftests: Precisely limit the number of guest loops " Sean Christopherson
2024-10-09 15:49 ` [PATCH v3 13/14] KVM: selftests: Add a read-only mprotect() phase to mmu_stress_test Sean Christopherson
2024-10-09 15:49 ` [PATCH v3 14/14] KVM: selftests: Verify KVM correctly handles mprotect(PROT_READ) Sean Christopherson
2024-10-31 19:51 ` [PATCH v3 00/14] KVM: selftests: Morph max_guest_mem to mmu_stress Sean Christopherson
2024-11-05 5:53 ` Sean Christopherson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZyT-6iCNlA1VSAV3@google.com \
--to=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=ajones@ventanamicro.com \
--cc=anup@brainfault.org \
--cc=aou@eecs.berkeley.edu \
--cc=borntraeger@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=dwmw@amazon.co.uk \
--cc=frankja@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=imbrenda@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=jthoughton@google.com \
--cc=kvm-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kvmarm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=oliver.upton@linux.dev \
--cc=palmer@dabbelt.com \
--cc=paul.walmsley@sifive.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).