From: Andrey Skvortsov <andrej.skvortzov@gmail.com>
To: Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@csie.org>
Cc: Jernej Skrabec <jernej.skrabec@gmail.com>,
Samuel Holland <samuel@sholland.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-sunxi@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Shoji Keita <awaittrot@shjk.jp>, Icenowy Zheng <icenowy@aosc.io>,
Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] arm64: dts: sun50i-a64-pinephone: Add AF8133J to PinePhone
Date: Wed, 6 Nov 2024 10:05:56 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZysVVCIdJ_hpe0OS@skv.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAGb2v66DgOmfm0U_dm-+=3nEXaZWUMZiajCdkqVJ6vUPvGC8tQ@mail.gmail.com>
Hi,
On 24-11-06 10:31, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 6, 2024 at 3:51 AM Andrey Skvortsov
> <andrej.skvortzov@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > FYI I'm open to either approach. If the firmware can do it, that is also
> > > fine. I don't know if it makes sense to have both disabled by default
> > > though? That would break existing users, but so would the in-kernel
> > > prober approach, which requires both components be marked as
> > > "fail-needs-probe", and also requires that the kernel driver be enabled.
> > > In other words, I think the firmware approach is friendlier for existing
> > > users that have the original batches.
> >
> > Current patches leave original magnetometer enabled as before. So only
> > the new alternative magnetometer is disabled. Firmware prober will set
> > the correct status. So you are right firmware approach is a bit nicer
> > for existing users, nothing will change for them with any combination
> > of kernel and firmware. Let's go with a firmware approach with current
> > patches then, if nobody
>
> If?
if no one has anything against that.
> I'll wait a day before applying this patch then.
Sure, thanks.
--
Best regards,
Andrey Skvortsov
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-11-06 7:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-09-08 21:47 [PATCH 0/2] Fix magnetometers on PinePhone Andrey Skvortsov
2024-09-08 21:47 ` [PATCH 1/2] arm64: dts: sun50i-a64-pinephone: Add AF8133J to PinePhone Andrey Skvortsov
2024-09-09 8:08 ` Chen-Yu Tsai
2024-09-15 10:12 ` Andrey Skvortsov
2024-10-19 2:04 ` Chen-Yu Tsai
2024-11-05 19:51 ` Andrey Skvortsov
2024-11-06 2:31 ` Chen-Yu Tsai
2024-11-06 7:05 ` Andrey Skvortsov [this message]
2024-09-08 21:47 ` [PATCH 2/2] arm64: dts: sun50i-a64-pinephone: Add mount-matrix for PinePhone magnetometers Andrey Skvortsov
2024-11-07 15:26 ` [PATCH 0/2] Fix magnetometers on PinePhone Chen-Yu Tsai
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZysVVCIdJ_hpe0OS@skv.local \
--to=andrej.skvortzov@gmail.com \
--cc=andre.przywara@arm.com \
--cc=awaittrot@shjk.jp \
--cc=icenowy@aosc.io \
--cc=jernej.skrabec@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-sunxi@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=samuel@sholland.org \
--cc=wens@csie.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).