linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Lorenzo Bianconi <lorenzo@kernel.org>
To: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>
Cc: "Ryder Lee" <ryder.lee@mediatek.com>,
	"Jianjun Wang" <jianjun.wang@mediatek.com>,
	"Lorenzo Pieralisi" <lpieralisi@kernel.org>,
	"Krzysztof Wilczyński" <kw@linux.com>,
	"Manivannan Sadhasivam" <manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org>,
	"Rob Herring" <robh@kernel.org>,
	"Bjorn Helgaas" <bhelgaas@google.com>,
	"Philipp Zabel" <p.zabel@pengutronix.de>,
	"Matthias Brugger" <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>,
	"AngeloGioacchino Del Regno"
	<angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com>,
	linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] PCI: mediatek-gen3: Move reset/assert callbacks in .power_up()
Date: Thu, 7 Nov 2024 17:08:55 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZyzmFyRYDHX0W6bB@lore-desk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241107152705.GA1614612@bhelgaas>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3528 bytes --]

> On Thu, Nov 07, 2024 at 02:50:55PM +0100, Lorenzo Bianconi wrote:
> > In order to make the code more readable, move phy and mac reset lines
> > assert/de-assert configuration in .power_up callback
> > (mtk_pcie_en7581_power_up/mtk_pcie_power_up).
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Lorenzo Bianconi <lorenzo@kernel.org>
> > ---
> >  drivers/pci/controller/pcie-mediatek-gen3.c | 24 ++++++++++++++++--------
> >  1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-mediatek-gen3.c b/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-mediatek-gen3.c
> > index 8c8c733a145634cdbfefd339f4a692f25a6e24de..c0127d0fb4f059b9f9e816360130e183e8f0e990 100644
> > --- a/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-mediatek-gen3.c
> > +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-mediatek-gen3.c
> > @@ -867,6 +867,13 @@ static int mtk_pcie_en7581_power_up(struct mtk_gen3_pcie *pcie)
> >  	int err;
> >  	u32 val;
> >  
> > +	/*
> > +	 * The controller may have been left out of reset by the bootloader
> > +	 * so make sure that we get a clean start by asserting resets here.
> > +	 */
> > +	reset_control_bulk_assert(pcie->soc->phy_resets.num_resets,
> > +				  pcie->phy_resets);
> > +	reset_control_assert(pcie->mac_reset);
> 
> Add blank line here.

ack, I will fix it.

> 
> >  	/*
> >  	 * Wait for the time needed to complete the bulk assert in
> >  	 * mtk_pcie_setup for EN7581 SoC.
> > @@ -941,6 +948,15 @@ static int mtk_pcie_power_up(struct mtk_gen3_pcie *pcie)
> >  	struct device *dev = pcie->dev;
> >  	int err;
> >  
> > +	/*
> > +	 * The controller may have been left out of reset by the bootloader
> > +	 * so make sure that we get a clean start by asserting resets here.
> > +	 */
> > +	reset_control_bulk_assert(pcie->soc->phy_resets.num_resets,
> > +				  pcie->phy_resets);
> > +	reset_control_assert(pcie->mac_reset);
> > +	usleep_range(10, 20);
> 
> Unrelated to this patch, but since you're moving it, do you know what
> this delay is for?  Can we add a #define and a spec citation for it?

I am not sure about it, this was already there.
@Jianjun Wang: any input on it?

> 
> Is there a requirement that the PHY and MAC reset ordering be
> different for EN7581 vs other chips?
> 
> EN7581:
> 
>   assert PHY reset
>   assert MAC reset
>   power on PHY
>   deassert PHY reset
>   deassert MAC reset
> 
> others:
> 
>   assert PHY reset
>   assert MAC reset
>   deassert PHY reset
>   power on PHY
>   deassert MAC reset
> 
> Is there one order that would work for both?

EN7581 requires to run phy_init()/phy_power_on() before deassert PHY reset
lines.

Regards,
Lorenzo

> 
> >  	/* PHY power on and enable pipe clock */
> >  	err = reset_control_bulk_deassert(pcie->soc->phy_resets.num_resets, pcie->phy_resets);
> >  	if (err) {
> > @@ -1013,14 +1029,6 @@ static int mtk_pcie_setup(struct mtk_gen3_pcie *pcie)
> >  	 * counter since the bulk is shared.
> >  	 */
> >  	reset_control_bulk_deassert(pcie->soc->phy_resets.num_resets, pcie->phy_resets);
> > -	/*
> > -	 * The controller may have been left out of reset by the bootloader
> > -	 * so make sure that we get a clean start by asserting resets here.
> > -	 */
> > -	reset_control_bulk_assert(pcie->soc->phy_resets.num_resets, pcie->phy_resets);
> > -
> > -	reset_control_assert(pcie->mac_reset);
> > -	usleep_range(10, 20);
> >  
> >  	/* Don't touch the hardware registers before power up */
> >  	err = pcie->soc->power_up(pcie);
> > 
> > -- 
> > 2.47.0
> > 

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 228 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2024-11-07 16:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-11-07 13:50 [PATCH 0/3] PCI: mediatek-gen3: mtk_pcie_en7581_power_up code refactoring Lorenzo Bianconi
2024-11-07 13:50 ` [PATCH 1/3] PCI: mediatek-gen3: Add missing reset_control_deassert for mac_rst in mtk_pcie_en7581_power_up Lorenzo Bianconi
2024-11-07 13:50 ` [PATCH 2/3] PCI: mediatek-gen3: rely on clk_bulk_prepare_enable " Lorenzo Bianconi
2024-11-07 15:19   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2024-11-07 15:28     ` Lorenzo Bianconi
2024-11-07 13:50 ` [PATCH 3/3] PCI: mediatek-gen3: Move reset/assert callbacks in .power_up() Lorenzo Bianconi
2024-11-07 15:27   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2024-11-07 16:08     ` Lorenzo Bianconi [this message]
2024-11-07 16:21       ` Bjorn Helgaas
2024-11-07 16:37         ` Lorenzo Bianconi
2024-11-08  2:51         ` Jianjun Wang (王建军)
2024-11-08 16:48           ` Bjorn Helgaas
2024-11-08 17:15             ` lorenzo
2024-11-08  2:41       ` Jianjun Wang (王建军)
2024-11-08  8:39         ` lorenzo
2024-11-08 16:37           ` Bjorn Helgaas
2024-11-08 17:04             ` lorenzo
2024-11-08 17:17               ` Bjorn Helgaas
2024-11-08 17:23                 ` lorenzo
2024-11-11  6:04                   ` Jianjun Wang (王建军)

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ZyzmFyRYDHX0W6bB@lore-desk \
    --to=lorenzo@kernel.org \
    --cc=angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com \
    --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=helgaas@kernel.org \
    --cc=jianjun.wang@mediatek.com \
    --cc=kw@linux.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lpieralisi@kernel.org \
    --cc=manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org \
    --cc=matthias.bgg@gmail.com \
    --cc=p.zabel@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=robh@kernel.org \
    --cc=ryder.lee@mediatek.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).