From: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org>
To: Arnaud Pouliquen <arnaud.pouliquen@foss.st.com>
Cc: Bjorn Andersson <andersson@kernel.org>,
Jens Wiklander <jens.wiklander@linaro.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@kernel.org>,
linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
op-tee@lists.trustedfirmware.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v13 4/7] remoteproc: Introduce release_fw optional operation
Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2024 13:22:57 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZzZcITZq/U9SOqnP@p14s> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241104133515.256497-5-arnaud.pouliquen@foss.st.com>
On Mon, Nov 04, 2024 at 02:35:12PM +0100, Arnaud Pouliquen wrote:
> This patch updates the rproc_ops struct to include an optional
> release_fw function.
>
> The release_fw ops is responsible for releasing the remote processor
> firmware image. The ops is called in the following cases:
>
> - An error occurs in rproc_start() between the loading of the segments and
> the start of the remote processor.
> - after stopping the remote processor.
>
> Signed-off-by: Arnaud Pouliquen <arnaud.pouliquen@foss.st.com>
> ---
> Updates from version V11:
> - fix typo in @release_fw comment
> ---
> drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c | 5 +++++
> include/linux/remoteproc.h | 3 +++
> 2 files changed, 8 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
> index 7694817f25d4..46863e1ca307 100644
> --- a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
> +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
> @@ -1258,6 +1258,9 @@ static int rproc_alloc_registered_carveouts(struct rproc *rproc)
>
> static void rproc_release_fw(struct rproc *rproc)
> {
> + if (rproc->ops->release_fw)
> + rproc->ops->release_fw(rproc);
> +
> /* Free the copy of the resource table */
> kfree(rproc->cached_table);
> rproc->cached_table = NULL;
> @@ -1377,6 +1380,8 @@ static int rproc_start(struct rproc *rproc, const struct firmware *fw)
> unprepare_subdevices:
> rproc_unprepare_subdevices(rproc);
> reset_table_ptr:
> + if (rproc->ops->release_fw)
> + rproc->ops->release_fw(rproc);
I always thought that looked hackish and brittle. I am trying to find a better
solution.
Mathieu
> rproc->table_ptr = rproc->cached_table;
>
> return ret;
> diff --git a/include/linux/remoteproc.h b/include/linux/remoteproc.h
> index 2e0ddcb2d792..08e0187a84d9 100644
> --- a/include/linux/remoteproc.h
> +++ b/include/linux/remoteproc.h
> @@ -381,6 +381,8 @@ enum rsc_handling_status {
> * @panic: optional callback to react to system panic, core will delay
> * panic at least the returned number of milliseconds
> * @coredump: collect firmware dump after the subsystem is shutdown
> + * @release_fw: optional function to release the firmware image from ROM memories.
> + * This function is called after stopping the remote processor or in case of an error
> */
> struct rproc_ops {
> int (*prepare)(struct rproc *rproc);
> @@ -403,6 +405,7 @@ struct rproc_ops {
> u64 (*get_boot_addr)(struct rproc *rproc, const struct firmware *fw);
> unsigned long (*panic)(struct rproc *rproc);
> void (*coredump)(struct rproc *rproc);
> + void (*release_fw)(struct rproc *rproc);
> };
>
> /**
> --
> 2.25.1
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-11-14 20:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-11-04 13:35 [PATCH v13 0/7] Introduction of a remoteproc tee to load signed firmware Arnaud Pouliquen
2024-11-04 13:35 ` [PATCH v13 1/7] remoteproc: core: Introduce rproc_pa_to_va helper Arnaud Pouliquen
2024-11-04 13:35 ` [PATCH v13 2/7] remoteproc: Add TEE support Arnaud Pouliquen
2024-11-14 17:59 ` Mathieu Poirier
2024-11-15 8:40 ` Arnaud POULIQUEN
2024-11-04 13:35 ` [PATCH v13 3/7] remoteproc: core: Refactor resource table cleanup into rproc_release_fw Arnaud Pouliquen
2024-11-04 13:35 ` [PATCH v13 4/7] remoteproc: Introduce release_fw optional operation Arnaud Pouliquen
2024-11-14 20:22 ` Mathieu Poirier [this message]
2024-11-18 17:52 ` Mathieu Poirier
2024-11-19 8:02 ` Arnaud POULIQUEN
2024-11-19 18:10 ` Arnaud POULIQUEN
2024-11-19 20:38 ` Mathieu Poirier
2024-11-20 16:04 ` Mathieu Poirier
2024-11-20 16:35 ` Arnaud POULIQUEN
2024-11-21 15:54 ` Mathieu Poirier
2024-11-20 16:08 ` Arnaud POULIQUEN
2024-11-04 13:35 ` [PATCH v13 5/7] dt-bindings: remoteproc: Add compatibility for TEE support Arnaud Pouliquen
2024-11-04 13:35 ` [PATCH v13 6/7] remoteproc: stm32: Create sub-functions to request shutdown and release Arnaud Pouliquen
2024-11-04 13:35 ` [PATCH v13 7/7] remoteproc: stm32: Add support of an OP-TEE TA to load the firmware Arnaud Pouliquen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZzZcITZq/U9SOqnP@p14s \
--to=mathieu.poirier@linaro.org \
--cc=andersson@kernel.org \
--cc=arnaud.pouliquen@foss.st.com \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=jens.wiklander@linaro.org \
--cc=krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com \
--cc=op-tee@lists.trustedfirmware.org \
--cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).