linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mostafa Saleh <smostafa@google.com>
To: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, iommu@lists.linux.dev,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, will@kernel.org,
	joro@8bytes.org, Daniel Mentz <danielmentz@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drivers/io-pgtable-arm: Fix stage concatenation with 16K
Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2024 19:18:36 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZzeejJL3Tt4OlFdr@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <888e6542-2aa4-43f1-b31e-79432c1ad199@arm.com>

Hi Robin,

On Fri, Nov 15, 2024 at 06:29:20PM +0000, Robin Murphy wrote:
> On 2024-11-15 5:22 pm, Mostafa Saleh wrote:
> > According to the Arm spec DDI0487 K.a, in:
> > "Table D8-9 Implications of the effective minimum T0SZ value on the
> > initial stage 2 lookup level"
> > 
> > Some combinations of granule and input size with stage-2 would
> > require to use initial lookup levels that can only be achieved
> > with concatenated PGDs.
> > 
> > There was one missing case in the current implementation for 16K,
> > which is 40-bits.
> > 
> > Cc: Daniel Mentz <danielmentz@google.com>
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Mostafa Saleh <smostafa@google.com>
> > ---
> >   drivers/iommu/io-pgtable-arm.c | 14 +++++++++++---
> >   1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/iommu/io-pgtable-arm.c b/drivers/iommu/io-pgtable-arm.c
> > index 0e67f1721a3d..9a57874a5cb8 100644
> > --- a/drivers/iommu/io-pgtable-arm.c
> > +++ b/drivers/iommu/io-pgtable-arm.c
> > @@ -1044,10 +1044,18 @@ arm_64_lpae_alloc_pgtable_s2(struct io_pgtable_cfg *cfg, void *cookie)
> >   		return NULL;
> >   	/*
> > -	 * Concatenate PGDs at level 1 if possible in order to reduce
> > -	 * the depth of the stage-2 walk.
> > +	 * Some cases where concatenation is mandatory after de-ciphering RSRKBC
> > +	 * in the Arm DDI0487 (K.a):
> > +	 * - 40 bits with 4K: use 2 table at level 1 instead of level 0
> > +	 * - 40 bits with 16K: use 16 tables at level 2 instead of level 1
> > +	 * - 42 bits with 4K: use 8 tabels at level 1 instead of level 0
> > +	 * - 48 bits with 16K: use 2 tabels at level 1 instead of level 0
> 
> This confused me, since per R_DXBSH, that last one is the only one which is
> actually mandatory in general; the others may be valid per R_PZFHQ and
> R_FBHPY. The additional R_SRKBC constraints come from the PA size, not the
> choice of T0SZ (and thus ultimately start_level) itself, so although I guess
> this probably works out true in practice based on how the SMMU drivers
> happen to behave today, it's none too obvious why.

Ah, you are right, I got a bit confused, it's not actually about the
input size, but the fact that the SMMUv3 driver uses IAS = OAS for
stage-2.
And constraint R_SRKBC is about the OAS size.

So in case we change that IAS = OAS for stage-2, we could end up using
concatenation when it's not mandatory.
I don't think that's a bad thing (I was actually thinking of changing
the code to always use concatenation if possible)
But, I can re-write the code in terms of OAS + granule instead so it's
more robust incase we change the stage-2 config in the future.

Thanks,
Mostafa
> 
> Thanks,
> Robin.
> 
> > +	 * Looking at the possible valid input size, that concludes to always
> > +	 * use level 1 with concatentation if possible or at level 2 only
> > +	 * with 16K.
> >   	 */
> > -	if (data->start_level == 0) {
> > +	if ((data->start_level == 0) ||
> > +	    ((data->start_level == 1) && (ARM_LPAE_GRANULE(data) == SZ_16K))) {
> >   		unsigned long pgd_pages;
> >   		pgd_pages = ARM_LPAE_PGD_SIZE(data) / sizeof(arm_lpae_iopte);
> 


      reply	other threads:[~2024-11-15 19:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-11-15 17:22 [PATCH] drivers/io-pgtable-arm: Fix stage concatenation with 16K Mostafa Saleh
2024-11-15 18:29 ` Robin Murphy
2024-11-15 19:18   ` Mostafa Saleh [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ZzeejJL3Tt4OlFdr@google.com \
    --to=smostafa@google.com \
    --cc=danielmentz@google.com \
    --cc=iommu@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=joro@8bytes.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).