From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>
To: Yanan Yang <yanan.yang@nxp.com>
Cc: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@kernel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@kernel.org>,
Shawn Guo <shawnguo@kernel.org>,
Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>,
Pengutronix Kernel Team <kernel@pengutronix.de>,
Fabio Estevam <festevam@gmail.com>,
devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
imx@lists.linux.dev, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
qijian.guo@nxp.com, justin.jiang@nxp.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: arm: fsl: Add FRDM-IMX91S board
Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2025 02:16:55 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <a252e741-aab3-4fec-ae8f-38634d071d77@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <aTkTz-5QoB8BuLs7@lsvm11u0000554.swis.ap-northeast-2.aws.nxp.com>
On 10/12/2025 07:31, Yanan Yang wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 05, 2025 at 09:21:55AM +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> On 05/12/2025 09:03, Yanan.Yang wrote:
>>> Add DT compatible string for NXP FRDM-IMX91S board
>>>
>>> The FRDM i.MX 91S development board is an low-cost and compact
>>> development board featuring the i.MX 91 applications processor.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Yanan.Yang <yanan.yang@nxp.com>
>>
>> Are you sure your Latin name contains '.' character? Or you just copied
>> login?
>>
>>> ---
>>> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/fsl.yaml | 1 +
>>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/fsl.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/fsl.yaml
>>> index 68a2d5fecc43..82f28be401b8 100644
>>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/fsl.yaml
>>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/fsl.yaml
>>> @@ -1412,6 +1412,7 @@ properties:
>>> items:
>>> - enum:
>>> - fsl,imx91-11x11-evk # i.MX91 11x11 EVK Board
>>> + - fsl,imx91-11x11-frdm-s # FRDM-IMX91S Board
>>
>> Anyway, this was sent, or something almost the same.
>>
>> Align internally before posting duplicates or at least explain why this
>> is not a duplicate It is not the job of the community to coordinate how
>> NXP employees should work. Srsly, it's NXP's job.
>>
> Hi Krzysztof,
> Thank you for your review and for pointing this out.
>
> This patch set is not a duplicate of the FRDM-IMX91 series. It introduces
> support for a new board: FRDM-IMX91S. While FRDM-IMX91S is similar to
> FRDM-IMX91, there are hardware differences that require a separate DTS:
>
> - 512MB LPDDR4 (FRDM-IMX91 uses 1GB)
> - 256MB FlexSPI-NAND (FRDM-IMX91 uses 8GB eMMC)
> - Single GbE port (FRDM-IMX91 has dual GbE)
> - PMIC PF9453 (FRDM-IMX91 uses PCA9451A)
>
> These differences were described in the cover letter and commit message,
> but I can make them more explicit if needed.
I cannot find anything about it in commit msg. Look, you wrote:
"Add DT compatible string for NXP FRDM-IMX91S board
The FRDM i.MX 91S development board is an low-cost and compact
development board featuring the i.MX 91 applications processor."
so where is it? About cover letter, I usually do not read them, some
maintainers skip entirely.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-12-11 1:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-12-05 8:03 [PATCH 0/2] Add NXP FRDM-IMX91S board support Yanan.Yang
2025-12-05 8:03 ` [PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: arm: fsl: Add FRDM-IMX91S board Yanan.Yang
2025-12-05 8:21 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2025-12-10 6:31 ` Yanan Yang
2025-12-11 1:16 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski [this message]
2025-12-11 1:55 ` Yanan Yang
2025-12-05 8:03 ` [PATCH 2/2] arm64: dts: freescale: add NXP FRDM-IMX91S board support Yanan.Yang
2025-12-05 8:23 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2025-12-05 9:04 ` Francesco Dolcini
2025-12-08 2:17 ` Joseph Guo
2025-12-08 9:13 ` Marc Kleine-Budde
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=a252e741-aab3-4fec-ae8f-38634d071d77@kernel.org \
--to=krzk@kernel.org \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=festevam@gmail.com \
--cc=imx@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=justin.jiang@nxp.com \
--cc=kernel@pengutronix.de \
--cc=krzk+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=qijian.guo@nxp.com \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=s.hauer@pengutronix.de \
--cc=shawnguo@kernel.org \
--cc=yanan.yang@nxp.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox