From: jarkko.nikula@linux.intel.com (Jarkko Nikula)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] i2c: designware: don't infer timings described by ACPI from clock rate
Date: Mon, 22 May 2017 09:35:24 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <a254b8bf-cbca-599a-2986-6775fbadb79c@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <62548890-2541-32b2-2015-74b5ed40f115@siemens.com>
On 05/22/2017 08:44 AM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> On 2017-05-21 10:09, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
>> On 19 May 2017 at 09:56, Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org> wrote:
>>> Commit bd698d24b1b57 ("i2c: designware: Get selected speed mode
>>> sda-hold-time via ACPI") updated the logic that reads the timing
>>> parameters for various I2C bus rates from the DSDT, to only read
>>> the timing parameters for the currently selected mode.
>>>
>>> This causes a WARN_ON() splat on platforms that legally omit the clock
>>> frequency from the ACPI description, because in the new situation, the
>>> core I2C designware driver still accesses the fields in the driver
>>> struct that we no longer populate, and proceeds to calculate them from
>>> the clock frequency. Since the clock frequency is unspecified, the
>>> driver complains loudly using a WARN_ON().
>>>
>>> So revert back to the old situation, where the struct fields for all
>>> timings are populated, but retain the new logic which chooses the SDA
>>> hold time from the timing mode that is currently in use.
>>>
>>> Fixes: bd698d24b1b57 ("i2c: designware: Get selected speed mode ...")
>>> Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
>>> ---
>>> drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware-platdrv.c | 18 ++++++++++--------
>>> 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware-platdrv.c b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware-platdrv.c
>>> index f2acd4b6bf01..6283b99d2b17 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware-platdrv.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware-platdrv.c
>>> @@ -96,6 +96,7 @@ static int dw_i2c_acpi_configure(struct platform_device *pdev)
>>> struct dw_i2c_dev *dev = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
>>> acpi_handle handle = ACPI_HANDLE(&pdev->dev);
>>> const struct acpi_device_id *id;
>>> + u32 ss_ht, fp_ht, hs_ht, fs_ht;
>>
>> Should these be initialized to zero? I realized that
>> dw_i2c_acpi_params() could fail, resulting in bogus hold time values
>> being returnted, but it is unclear to me how that affects the logic in
>> the core driver.
>
Oh, indeed, great you found this quickly and we got also report and fix
quickly from Jan. In bad case this could have been difficult to bisect.
> I can tell you what happens: this breaks e.g. the Galileo and the
> IOT2000 boards. Will send a patch to initialize the vars to 0, restoring
> the previous behavior in the absence to the ACPI parameters. The core is
> prepared for sda_hold_time == 0.
>
Yes, i2c-designware-core.c will read the hold time from HW set by
bootloader or the reset default when dev->sda_hold_time is zero.
--
Jarkko
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-05-22 6:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-05-19 8:56 [PATCH] i2c: designware: don't infer timings described by ACPI from clock rate Ard Biesheuvel
2017-05-19 10:01 ` Jarkko Nikula
2017-05-19 10:06 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2017-05-19 10:37 ` Jarkko Nikula
2017-05-19 10:48 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2017-05-19 12:38 ` Wolfram Sang
2017-05-21 8:09 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2017-05-22 5:44 ` Jan Kiszka
2017-05-22 6:35 ` Jarkko Nikula [this message]
2017-05-22 5:46 ` [PATCH] i2c: designware: Fix bogus sda_hold_time due to uninitialized vars Jan Kiszka
2017-05-22 6:02 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2017-05-22 6:37 ` Jarkko Nikula
2017-05-22 8:36 ` Wolfram Sang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=a254b8bf-cbca-599a-2986-6775fbadb79c@linux.intel.com \
--to=jarkko.nikula@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox