From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C791CCA5FF0 for ; Mon, 5 Oct 2026 12:29:39 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender:List-Subscribe:List-Help :List-Post:List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-Type:In-Reply-To:From:References:Cc:To:Subject:MIME-Version:Date: Message-ID:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From: Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=3gSC8BWgYbWrAg0Kx9BnmmGYI/8F5QnU2tOw3NoHWuA=; b=QfWR5vlU8UTlyZNiAPi8qCPG5l wteXff9Yww7Ouffb6mQqi8LaWLx1LLgCOeAIGKVyBSERg2Z/nCJgFauCi+Io52BJ6W0ZNXPt0ZHz6 eM6SVhifyJNcM0mqfIlhb9TmmnkSAhEE+0OVwOWbk80R03CPwXMujq2SS9GqNB7+BG/j+4ij8i7rA 182CzzO6rESHlJ4Z4YVm2pxa1CkW0osMftwb3QTf0rgsRAxfOgWH9oc1c9FLKwf4UeH540j7i3VdQ 8+s1EXOpan8oOEJKoVHKQrTYiUqDVUZBQ+Y/jC+h4ODUKcl59Ep6nzi4+irw5RB6M8GjScogf+UQx Adft5TCQ==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.99.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1xDhox-0000000GOzm-0ulP; Mon, 05 Oct 2026 12:29:31 +0000 Received: from foss.arm.com ([217.140.110.172]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.99.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1xDhou-0000000GOzL-1Bwk for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Mon, 05 Oct 2026 12:29:29 +0000 Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A8FE152B; Mon, 5 Oct 2026 05:29:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [10.2.212.23] (e121345-lin.cambridge.arm.com [10.2.212.23]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 54FBF3F86F; Mon, 5 Oct 2026 05:29:24 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=arm.com; s=foss; t=1791203364; bh=kvuyZYEDNj0i1sF9V+F8wbBxaj7cf+K5/6Sca5BzRlw=; h=Date:Subject:To:Cc:References:From:In-Reply-To:From; b=PA/TilmzGf/fTGgNQJNQeV9G4+0zdmbfhEfA1URx62ZNN5JO9GjxBe2vOCPMwaUdh 65SSW3CAUb3N0zWPGdGbCyIoVv4BbfVazoF8dfskgQ+eDvfuEWz+wCJpmUCyCUcOTY 2n/9+vDBIBqyeUKVYreZxeX9H8Ptew+9Y8NoR2OQ= Message-ID: Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2026 13:29:22 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf/arm_cspmu: Add Arm system PMU To: Will Deacon Cc: mark.rutland@arm.com, linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org References: <84a65061841c8870375ee6b0621dd3f61651763d.1788970980.git.robin.murphy@arm.com> From: Robin Murphy Content-Language: en-GB In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.9.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20261005_052928_403496_0968A30C X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 14.01 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On 04/10/2026 6:26 pm, Will Deacon wrote: > On Wed, Sep 09, 2026 at 05:23:00PM +0100, Robin Murphy wrote: >> Arm's latest Compute Subsystems and SoCs are using a common PMU block >> in various places which can mostly just be driven as a generic 64-bit >> CoreSight PMU, but does have an IMP-DEF register for additional >> filtering. The details of event and filter encodings depend on the >> particular PMU instance, so are left to the higher level Arm Telemetry >> Solution tooling. >> >> Signed-off-by: Robin Murphy >> --- >> drivers/perf/arm_cspmu/Kconfig | 7 +++ >> drivers/perf/arm_cspmu/Makefile | 1 + >> drivers/perf/arm_cspmu/arm_cspmu.c | 7 +++ >> drivers/perf/arm_cspmu/arm_cspmu.h | 1 + >> drivers/perf/arm_cspmu/arm_syspmu.c | 67 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >> 5 files changed, 83 insertions(+) >> create mode 100644 drivers/perf/arm_cspmu/arm_syspmu.c > > Sashiko failed to apply this and so did I :/ > > What is it based on? Ah, sorry, I sent this straight off my local branch where it's on top of the BMU patches - clearly I forgot to consider that that would mean some context conflicts in the Kconfig and Makefile. I can resend if that's easiest. Cheers, Robin.