From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: swetland@google.com (Brian Swetland) Date: Tue, 2 Mar 2010 15:38:44 -0800 Subject: board/device file names, and machine names In-Reply-To: <1267572545.8759.121.camel@c-dwalke-linux.qualcomm.com> References: <1267565398.8759.77.camel@c-dwalke-linux.qualcomm.com> <1267572545.8759.121.camel@c-dwalke-linux.qualcomm.com> Message-ID: To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Tue, Mar 2, 2010 at 3:29 PM, Daniel Walker wrote: >> This seems like an unforunate issue to bikeshed about, and by >> insisting on renaming the board names, more hurdles are put up between >> the (often competing, at least for our time) goals of "going to >> mainline" and "maintaining an up to date tree that works on production >> hardware without regression". > > This is really a classic kind of issue .. If you work with us (i.e. the > community) , then your code goes into the kernel. If you ignore us, then > your code usually doesn't go in .. Alrighty then. Brian