Linux-ARM-Kernel Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dev Jain <dev.jain@arm.com>
To: Muchun Song <muchun.song@linux.dev>
Cc: riel@surriel.com, vbabka@kernel.org, harry@kernel.org,
	jannh@google.com, lance.yang@linux.dev, kas@kernel.org,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	rcampbell@nvidia.com, apopple@nvidia.com, ziy@nvidia.com,
	matthew.brost@intel.com, joshua.hahnjy@gmail.com,
	rakie.kim@sk.com, byungchul@sk.com, gourry@gourry.net,
	ying.huang@linux.alibaba.com, nao.horiguchi@gmail.com,
	ak@linux.intel.com, mel@csn.ul.ie, pfalcato@suse.de,
	jpoimboe@kernel.org, dave.hansen@intel.com, tglx@kernel.org,
	catalin.marinas@arm.com, will@kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, ryan.roberts@arm.com,
	anshuman.khandual@arm.com, stable@vger.kernel.org,
	osalvador@suse.de, akpm@linux-foundation.org, ljs@kernel.org,
	david@kernel.org, liam@infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/6] mm/rmap: use huge_ptep_get() in try_to_unmap_one()
Date: Thu, 2 Jul 2026 14:38:48 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <a6a00b38-612f-439d-9b75-337170e3af30@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <97a43d82-28c2-4f98-ad74-fe05ed9f0297@linux.dev>



On 02/07/26 2:17 pm, Muchun Song wrote:
> 
> 
> On 2026/7/2 13:13, Dev Jain wrote:
>> try_to_unmap_one() handles hugetlb folios when memory failure needs
>> to replace a poisoned hugetlb mapping with a hwpoison entry. In that
>> case page_vma_mapped_walk() returns the pte pointer to the hugetlb folio
>> in pvmw.pte, but the code reads it with ptep_get().
>>
>> On arches which provide their own huge_ptep_get() to dereference a huge
>> pte pointer, accessing via ptep_get() would cause pte_pfn(), pte_present()
>> etc to misbehave.
>>
>> It is not clear whether this has a trivially visible effect to userspace.
>>
>> Just use huge_ptep_get() for dereferencing a huge pte pointer.
>>
>> Fixes: c7ab0d2fdc84 ("mm: convert try_to_unmap_one() to use page_vma_mapped_walk()")
>> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
>> Reported-by: David Hildenbrand <david@kernel.org>
>> Signed-off-by: Dev Jain <dev.jain@arm.com>
>> ---
>>   include/linux/hugetlb.h |  3 +++
>>   mm/rmap.c               | 16 ++++++++++------
>>   2 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/include/linux/hugetlb.h b/include/linux/hugetlb.h
>> index 2abaf99321e90..fdb7bdf7645c5 100644
>> --- a/include/linux/hugetlb.h
>> +++ b/include/linux/hugetlb.h
>> @@ -1261,6 +1261,9 @@ static inline void hugetlb_count_sub(long l, struct mm_struct *mm)
>>   {
>>   }
>>   +pte_t huge_ptep_get(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long addr,
>> +            pte_t *ptep);
>> +
> 
> Maybe I didn't express my thoughts clearly in the first version, let me
> explain in more detail.
> 
> We should define this stub as a no-op for !CONFIG_HUGETLB_PAGE (like
> set_huge_pte_at, that is why I mentioned 5d4af6195c87c6 for your reference
> in your previous version). Currently, you've added a declaration, but the
> function itself doesn't actually exist, which seems quite strange to me.

https://lore.kernel.org/all/a4fe8ba6-2ecd-4bb9-95a9-27f9f1e87d2e@kernel.org/

David suggested this. Honestly I quite like David's suggestion, what do you
think?


> 
> Muchun,
> Thanks.
>>   static inline pte_t huge_ptep_clear_flush(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
>>                         unsigned long addr, pte_t *ptep)
>>   {
>> diff --git a/mm/rmap.c b/mm/rmap.c
>> index 1c77d5dc06e9f..aa8a254efaecc 100644
>> --- a/mm/rmap.c
>> +++ b/mm/rmap.c
>> @@ -2095,11 +2095,16 @@ static bool try_to_unmap_one(struct folio *folio, struct vm_area_struct *vma,
>>           /* Unexpected PMD-mapped THP? */
>>           VM_BUG_ON_FOLIO(!pvmw.pte, folio);
>>   -        /*
>> -         * Handle PFN swap PTEs, such as device-exclusive ones, that
>> -         * actually map pages.
>> -         */
>> -        pteval = ptep_get(pvmw.pte);
>> +        address = pvmw.address;
>> +        if (folio_test_hugetlb(folio)) {
>> +            pteval = huge_ptep_get(mm, address, pvmw.pte);
>> +        } else {
>> +            /*
>> +             * Handle PFN swap PTEs, such as device-exclusive ones,
>> +             * that actually map pages.
>> +             */
>> +            pteval = ptep_get(pvmw.pte);
>> +        }
>>           if (likely(pte_present(pteval))) {
>>               pfn = pte_pfn(pteval);
>>           } else {
>> @@ -2110,7 +2115,6 @@ static bool try_to_unmap_one(struct folio *folio, struct vm_area_struct *vma,
>>           }
>>             subpage = folio_page(folio, pfn - folio_pfn(folio));
>> -        address = pvmw.address;
>>           anon_exclusive = folio_test_anon(folio) &&
>>                    PageAnonExclusive(subpage);
>>   
> 



  reply	other threads:[~2026-07-02  9:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-07-02  5:13 [PATCH v2 0/6] Fix incorrect access of hugetlb pte entries Dev Jain
2026-07-02  5:13 ` [PATCH v2 1/6] arm64: make huge_ptep_get handled unaligned addresses Dev Jain
2026-07-02 15:28   ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-07-02  5:13 ` [PATCH v2 2/6] mm/rmap: use huge_ptep_get() in try_to_unmap_one() Dev Jain
2026-07-02  8:47   ` Muchun Song
2026-07-02  9:08     ` Dev Jain [this message]
2026-07-02  9:35       ` Muchun Song
2026-07-02 15:30         ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-07-02 15:32   ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-07-02  5:13 ` [PATCH v2 3/6] mm/rmap: use huge_ptep_get() in try_to_migrate_one() Dev Jain
2026-07-02 15:34   ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-07-02  5:13 ` [PATCH v2 4/6] mm/migrate: use huge_ptep_get() in remove_migration_pte() Dev Jain
2026-07-02 15:44   ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-07-02  5:13 ` [PATCH v2 5/6] mm/page_vma_mapped: use huge_ptep_get() for hugetlb Dev Jain
2026-07-02  8:33   ` Muchun Song
2026-07-02 15:44   ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-07-02  5:13 ` [PATCH v2 6/6] mm/mprotect: " Dev Jain
2026-07-02  5:18   ` Dev Jain
2026-07-02  8:29     ` Muchun Song
2026-07-02  8:30   ` Muchun Song
2026-07-02 15:47   ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=a6a00b38-612f-439d-9b75-337170e3af30@arm.com \
    --to=dev.jain@arm.com \
    --cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=anshuman.khandual@arm.com \
    --cc=apopple@nvidia.com \
    --cc=byungchul@sk.com \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=dave.hansen@intel.com \
    --cc=david@kernel.org \
    --cc=gourry@gourry.net \
    --cc=harry@kernel.org \
    --cc=jannh@google.com \
    --cc=joshua.hahnjy@gmail.com \
    --cc=jpoimboe@kernel.org \
    --cc=kas@kernel.org \
    --cc=lance.yang@linux.dev \
    --cc=liam@infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=ljs@kernel.org \
    --cc=matthew.brost@intel.com \
    --cc=mel@csn.ul.ie \
    --cc=muchun.song@linux.dev \
    --cc=nao.horiguchi@gmail.com \
    --cc=osalvador@suse.de \
    --cc=pfalcato@suse.de \
    --cc=rakie.kim@sk.com \
    --cc=rcampbell@nvidia.com \
    --cc=riel@surriel.com \
    --cc=ryan.roberts@arm.com \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tglx@kernel.org \
    --cc=vbabka@kernel.org \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    --cc=ying.huang@linux.alibaba.com \
    --cc=ziy@nvidia.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox