From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.3 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_PATCH, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,NICE_REPLY_A,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED, USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49A24C5519F for ; Wed, 25 Nov 2020 09:31:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from merlin.infradead.org (merlin.infradead.org [205.233.59.134]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CC5CE206F9 for ; Wed, 25 Nov 2020 09:31:23 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lists.infradead.org header.i=@lists.infradead.org header.b="3D6r6AEH" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org CC5CE206F9 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=arm.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=merlin.20170209; h=Sender:Content-Type: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Cc:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post:List-Archive: List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Date:Message-ID:From: References:To:Subject:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=guP+JfoPSJUVaHeimO15w+ZADTuOdO3EVetv+2ZxUc4=; b=3D6r6AEHFXOPP6pcVPv3hP/34 jvfLKXQ1sJ1ohIFEDNxOxOYsN7FTNuYJC1DQlQadJM/j37UQsWxoyjxoNvbQ95f5tCeTamaPjmJVm EGor6j7P3jQbwAdPJAWXhVOfh51XtOlk9m0Ya3VhwUsY7grPnIfXGjUdrk6zZ00LVMm+cF10uFYSq aUg86jwmiLDt+6uFbQUhh9FAusHnbON0A7dKS0cdTSCY76TYwvk1n6+hKlDKNoYlIXxOcLcX1bz+l 8/bGZahRDaigOnZ/MxLkLuT+xhtgGZGIC6wp7m2kQgV152E0vrX1nl4QCh7nHSOoJbmWTA64hTiUb U64fPEIUQ==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=merlin.infradead.org) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1khr7l-0003E4-Ec; Wed, 25 Nov 2020 09:30:05 +0000 Received: from foss.arm.com ([217.140.110.172]) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1khr7h-0003C2-QO for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Wed, 25 Nov 2020 09:30:04 +0000 Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F84E106F; Wed, 25 Nov 2020 01:30:01 -0800 (PST) Received: from [10.57.27.121] (unknown [10.57.27.121]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5ED933F70D; Wed, 25 Nov 2020 01:29:59 -0800 (PST) Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] SCMI performance protocol power scale interface To: rafael@kernel.org References: <20201124104346.27167-1-lukasz.luba@arm.com> From: Lukasz Luba Message-ID: Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2020 09:29:57 +0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.9.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20201124104346.27167-1-lukasz.luba@arm.com> Content-Language: en-US X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20201125_043002_168302_6AA91F3C X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 20.40 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, viresh.kumar@linaro.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, morten.rasmussen@arm.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, sudeep.holla@arm.com, Dietmar.Eggemann@arm.com, cristian.marussi@arm.com Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org Hi Rafael, On 11/24/20 10:43 AM, Lukasz Luba wrote: > Hi all, > > The Energy Model (EM) supports power values expressed in an abstract scale > via new API. The SCMI performance protocol provides the information about > power scale. This patch set implements the needed interface and updates > cpufreq driver to set the right scale in the EM. > > It is based on top of patch series adding milli-Watts flag in EM [1] > (next-20201124 was used as a base). > > Regards, > Lukasz > > [1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pm/20201103090600.29053-1-lukasz.luba@arm.com/ > > Lukasz Luba (2): > firmware: arm_scmi: Add power_scale_mw_get() interface > cpufreq: arm_scmi: Discover the power scale in performance protocol > > drivers/cpufreq/scmi-cpufreq.c | 4 +++- > drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/perf.c | 8 ++++++++ > include/linux/scmi_protocol.h | 1 + > 3 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > Could you take this patch set, please? Patch 1/2, which is ARM firmware protocol change, got ACK from Sudeep in case it would go via your PM tree. The patch series is a follow up to the EM changes, which you have taken recently into your PM tree (link in the cover letter above). Regards, Lukasz _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel