From: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
To: Hsin-Yi Wang <hsinyi@chromium.org>,
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, David Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>,
amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: Rob Clark <robdclark@chromium.org>,
Stephen Boyd <swboyd@chromium.org>,
Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>,
Chun-Kuang Hu <chunkuang.hu@kernel.org>,
Sean Paul <sean@poorly.run>,
Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>,
Maxime Ripard <mripard@kernel.org>,
Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@suse.de>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>,
devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org,
Simon Ser <contact@emersion.fr>,
Harry Wentland <harry.wentland@amd.com>,
Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>,
Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>,
Emil Velikov <emil.l.velikov@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 0/4] Separate panel orientation property creating and value setting
Date: Mon, 30 May 2022 10:53:11 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <a8d1fe13-e747-016a-2d45-bfb50f23f2d9@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220530081910.3947168-1-hsinyi@chromium.org>
Hi,
On 5/30/22 10:19, Hsin-Yi Wang wrote:
> Some drivers, eg. mtk_drm and msm_drm, rely on the panel to set the
> orientation. Panel calls drm_connector_set_panel_orientation() to create
> orientation property and sets the value. However, connector properties
> can't be created after drm_dev_register() is called. The goal is to
> separate the orientation property creation, so drm drivers can create it
> earlier before drm_dev_register().
Sorry for jumping in pretty late in the discussion (based on the v10
I seem to have missed this before).
This sounds to me like the real issue here is that drm_dev_register()
is getting called too early?
To me it seems sensible to delay calling drm_dev_register() and
thus allowing userspace to start detecting available displays +
features until after the panel has been probed.
I see a devicetree patch in this series, so I guess that the panel
is described in devicetree. Especially in the case of devicetree
I would expect the kernel to have enough info to do the right
thing and make sure the panel is probed before calling
drm_dev_register() ?
Regards,
Hans
>
> After this series, drm_connector_set_panel_orientation() works like
> before. It won't affect existing callers of
> drm_connector_set_panel_orientation(). The only difference is that
> some drm drivers can call drm_connector_init_panel_orientation_property()
> earlier.
>
> Hsin-Yi Wang (4):
> gpu: drm: separate panel orientation property creating and value
> setting
> drm/mediatek: init panel orientation property
> drm/msm: init panel orientation property
> arm64: dts: mt8183: Add panel rotation
>
> .../arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8183-kukui.dtsi | 1 +
> drivers/gpu/drm/drm_connector.c | 58 ++++++++++++++-----
> drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_dsi.c | 7 +++
> drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dsi/dsi_manager.c | 4 ++
> include/drm/drm_connector.h | 2 +
> 5 files changed, 59 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
>
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-05-30 8:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-05-30 8:19 [PATCH v10 0/4] Separate panel orientation property creating and value setting Hsin-Yi Wang
2022-05-30 8:19 ` [PATCH v10 1/4] gpu: drm: separate " Hsin-Yi Wang
2022-05-30 8:57 ` Hans de Goede
2022-05-30 9:01 ` Hans de Goede
2022-05-30 8:19 ` [PATCH v10 2/4] drm/mediatek: init panel orientation property Hsin-Yi Wang
2022-05-30 8:19 ` [PATCH v10 3/4] drm/msm: " Hsin-Yi Wang
2022-05-30 8:19 ` [PATCH v10 4/4] arm64: dts: mt8183: Add panel rotation Hsin-Yi Wang
2022-05-30 8:53 ` Hans de Goede [this message]
2022-05-30 11:34 ` [PATCH v10 0/4] Separate panel orientation property creating and value setting Hsin-Yi Wang
2022-05-31 10:56 ` Hans de Goede
2022-06-01 8:26 ` Hsin-Yi Wang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=a8d1fe13-e747-016a-2d45-bfb50f23f2d9@redhat.com \
--to=hdegoede@redhat.com \
--cc=airlied@linux.ie \
--cc=alexander.deucher@amd.com \
--cc=amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=chunkuang.hu@kernel.org \
--cc=contact@emersion.fr \
--cc=daniel@ffwll.ch \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=dianders@chromium.org \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=emil.l.velikov@gmail.com \
--cc=harry.wentland@amd.com \
--cc=hsinyi@chromium.org \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=jani.nikula@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com \
--cc=matthias.bgg@gmail.com \
--cc=mripard@kernel.org \
--cc=robdclark@chromium.org \
--cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=sean@poorly.run \
--cc=swboyd@chromium.org \
--cc=tzimmermann@suse.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).