From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B4407C3ABC3 for ; Fri, 9 May 2025 09:16:48 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender:List-Subscribe:List-Help :List-Post:List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:Content-Type: MIME-Version:References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=kveNoEqSVKO6OwiY7w1g1XWZieO2QOIr3B/KrpemG+s=; b=XjPTLA9I0WzREMMDBLGG/5+f+V K4pkPvCjuSr+Wpm+A8fZxh8k063ZA2/5qpgpLVoNcl2lYqvNtQTzTTfZ1aAzmPtAcZm2ryGwrFp5a OPYAmKFmSZc7+zYkuQHwdir5/5Wdq7RjtBS4i1acUzPTKMcuq4CpI2+TnC2l8L8HUp/VILCi89TOi YN94jSoQp32uXNqjYWhpCgMFzGcyyzLGoo/bjlbol9CVtp36ak9CdAb7+spkdpt8gu6PYx0urz4Pk 73fbVLZIH2HvZF7kuNq1x/1tmbk22GF5ZK/dEJUu0Q95aknUUWdxElG93rZ3MCxbKl6IYt0ZioHFR 2/E3LPDQ==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.98.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1uDJqS-000000034Nj-2LsM; Fri, 09 May 2025 09:16:40 +0000 Received: from tor.source.kernel.org ([2600:3c04:e001:324:0:1991:8:25]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.98.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1uDJCf-00000002wLg-2BTl for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Fri, 09 May 2025 08:35:33 +0000 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (transwarp.subspace.kernel.org [100.75.92.58]) by tor.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E67F36111F; Fri, 9 May 2025 08:35:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B2209C4CEE4; Fri, 9 May 2025 08:35:28 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1746779732; bh=rT1+07xUMuQWJf5ZXEO//iIf5MgKUtLBdpIGIIMnfmE=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=H9IyVdICYyn1bbIiba3LsykLZ19QH2Nc3A7c6nmeyEB6imPkITNRQWJ6wNCodpWV4 tbQc1Gb0dW1zKDJUgcbnmWZZfFRnSNqN+JP9hcxSVSFMXv9EhBWWOF3u6P6FMU/Gy7 qDEfjOqvZevc1wE4OiDhwCrriqNNUXjKxsvD066VSg9S+ZdbN+FGi1qfOcXcV78Xar bxvFZARu6c9n5aGD9BMhLYPb9n8Y94eBUp1tPZV7qTJQUi5153MhhQV1F/+B7Hlw1I zroeYbV5E5VYdbMUw48ygAtmozdx8UaoRUg8RyrRvblCUIqYLKtylN/FNX/b03PO5k /Kf/M2xe1qz8w== Date: Fri, 9 May 2025 10:35:25 +0200 From: Lorenzo Pieralisi To: Marc Zyngier Cc: Thomas Gleixner , Rob Herring , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Conor Dooley , Catalin Marinas , Will Deacon , Arnd Bergmann , Sascha Bischoff , Timothy Hayes , "Liam R. Howlett" , Mark Rutland , Jiri Slaby , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 20/25] irqchip/gic-v5: Add GICv5 PPI support Message-ID: References: <20250506-gicv5-host-v3-20-6edd5a92fd09@kernel.org> <87zffpn5rk.ffs@tglx> <86a57ohjey.wl-maz@kernel.org> <87ecx0mt9p.ffs@tglx> <867c2sh6jx.wl-maz@kernel.org> <874ixwmpto.ffs@tglx> <864ixvh4ss.wl-maz@kernel.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Fri, May 09, 2025 at 10:07:44AM +0200, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote: > On Thu, May 08, 2025 at 12:44:45PM +0200, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote: > > [...] > > > I noticed that, if the irq_set_type() function is not implemented, > > we don't execute (in __irq_set_trigger()): > > > > irq_settings_set_level(desc); > > irqd_set(&desc->irq_data, IRQD_LEVEL); > > I don't get why the settings above are written only if the irqchip > has an irq_set_type() method, maybe they should be updated in > irqdomain code (?) where: > > irqd_set_trigger_type() > > is executed after creating the fwspec mapping ? > > Is it possible we never noticed because we have always had irqchips that > do implement irq_set_type() ? > > Again, I don't know the history behind the IRQD_LEVEL flag so it is just > a question, I'd need to get this clarified though please if I remove the > PPI irq_set_type() callback. https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/arch/powerpc/platforms/52xx/mpc52xx_pic.c?h=v6.15-rc5#n218 There are other examples in powerpc, this does not look right to me. Lorenzo > Thanks, > Lorenzo > > > which in turn means that irqd_is_level_type(&desc->irq_data) is false > > for PPIs (ie arch timers, despite being level interrupts). > > > > An immediate side effect is that they show as edge in: > > > > /proc/interrupts > > > > but that's just what I could notice. > > > > Should I set them myself in PPI translate/alloc functions ? > > > > Removing the irq_set_type() for PPIs does not seem so innocuous, it is a > > bit complex to check all ramifications, please let me know if you spot > > something I have missed. > > > > > > On the other hand, given that on GICv5 PPI handling mode is fixed, > > > > do you think that in the ppi_irq_domain_ops.translate() callback, > > > > I should check the type the firmware provided and fail the translation > > > > if it does not match the HW hardcoded value ? > > > > > > Why? The fact that the firmware is wrong doesn't change the hardware > > > integration. It just indicates that whoever wrote the firmware didn't > > > read the documentation. > > > > > > Even more, I wonder what the benefit of having that information in the > > > firmware tables if the only thing that matters in the immutable HW > > > view. Yes, having it in the DT/ACPI simplifies the job of the kernel > > > (only one format to parse). But it is overall useless information. > > > > Yes, that I agree but it would force firmware bindings to special case > > PPIs to remove the type (#interrupt-cells and co.). > > > > From what I read I understand I must ignore the PPI type provided by > > firmware. > > > > > > Obviously if firmware exposes the wrong type that's a firmware bug > > > > but I was wondering whether it is better to fail the firmware-to-Linux > > > > IRQ translation if the firmware provided type is wrong rather than carry > > > > on pretending that the type is correct (I was abusing the irq_set_type() > > > > callback to do just that - namely, check that the type provided by > > > > firmware matches HW but I think that's the wrong place to put it). > > > > > > I don't think there is anything to do. Worse case, you spit a > > > pr_warn_once() and carry on. > > > > Thanks, > > Lorenzo