Re: [PATCH v2 4/4] [NOT FOR UPSTREAM] firmware: arm_scmi: quirk: Ignore FC bit in attributes

[Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@arm.com>]

On Sun, Apr 27, 2025 at 04:46:47PM +0200, Johan Hovold wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 25, 2025 at 01:52:50PM +0100, Cristian Marussi wrote:
> > Some platform misreported the support of FastChannel when queried: ignore
> > that bit on selected platforms.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@arm.com>
> > ---
> > Match features has to be set-up properly before upstreaming this.
> > Ideally the out-of-spec firmware should be matched with a quirk matching
> > pattern based on Vendor/SubVendor/ImplVersion....but it is NOT clear if the
> > platform at hand will ship with future fixed firmwares where the ImplVersion
> > field is properly handled.
> > If we cannot be sure about that, we should fallback to a compatible match.
> > 
> > v1 -> v2
> > - use multiple compats quirks syntax
> > 
> > RFC->V1
> > - fix QUIRKS conditions
> 
> >  /* Global Quirks Definitions */
> >  DEFINE_SCMI_QUIRK(clock_rates_triplet_out_of_spec, NULL, NULL, NULL);
> > +DEFINE_SCMI_QUIRK(perf_level_get_fc_force,
> > +		  "bad-vend", NULL, "0x20000-", "bad-compat", "bad-compat-2");
> 
> Still works when matching on vendor and version (and/or machine or SoC
> compatible):
> 
> Reviewed-by: Johan Hovold <johan+linaro@kernel.org>
> Tested-by: Johan Hovold <johan+linaro@kernel.org>
> 
> I think we can go ahead and merge this based on vendor and version
> "0x20000-".
> 
> Depending on what Sibi finds out, or if it turns out to be needed, we
> can always add an upper version bound later.

Sure...sounds good.
Please post your final tested patch on top on my V3 as said elsewhere.

Thanks,
Cristian