* [PATCH] arm64/cpufeature: annotate arm64_use_ng_mappings with ro_after_init to prevent wrong idmap generation
@ 2025-05-02 14:57 Yeoreum Yun
2025-05-02 16:25 ` Nathan Chancellor
2025-05-02 16:41 ` Ard Biesheuvel
0 siblings, 2 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Yeoreum Yun @ 2025-05-02 14:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: catalin.marinas, will, nathan, nick.desaulniers+lkml, morbo,
justinstitt, broonie, maz, oliver.upton, frederic, joey.gouly,
james.morse, hardevsinh.palaniya, shameerali.kolothum.thodi, ardb,
ryan.roberts
Cc: linux-arm-kernel, linux-kernel, llvm, Yeoreum Yun, stable
create_init_idmap() could be called before .bss section initialization
which is done in early_map_kernel() since data/test_prot could be set
wrong for PTE_MAYBE_NG macro.
PTE_MAYBE_NG macro is set according to value of "arm64_use_ng_mappings".
and this variable is located in .bss section.
# llvm-objdump-21 --syms vmlinux-gcc | grep arm64_use_ng_mappings
ffff800082f242a8 g O .bss 0000000000000001 arm64_use_ng_mappings
If .bss section doesn't initialized, "arm64_use_ng_mappings" would be set
with garbage value ant then the text_prot or data_prot could be set
with garbgae value.
Here is what i saw with kernel compiled via llvm-21
// create_init_idmap()
ffff80008255c058: d10103ff sub sp, sp, #0x40
ffff80008255c05c: a9017bfd stp x29, x30, [sp, #0x10]
ffff80008255c060: a90257f6 stp x22, x21, [sp, #0x20]
ffff80008255c064: a9034ff4 stp x20, x19, [sp, #0x30]
ffff80008255c068: 910043fd add x29, sp, #0x10
ffff80008255c06c: 90003fc8 adrp x8, 0xffff800082d54000
ffff80008255c070: d280e06a mov x10, #0x703 // =1795
ffff80008255c074: 91400409 add x9, x0, #0x1, lsl #12 // =0x1000
ffff80008255c078: 394a4108 ldrb w8, [x8, #0x290] ------------- (1)
ffff80008255c07c: f2e00d0a movk x10, #0x68, lsl #48
ffff80008255c080: f90007e9 str x9, [sp, #0x8]
ffff80008255c084: aa0103f3 mov x19, x1
ffff80008255c088: aa0003f4 mov x20, x0
ffff80008255c08c: 14000000 b 0xffff80008255c08c <__pi_create_init_idmap+0x34>
ffff80008255c090: aa082d56 orr x22, x10, x8, lsl #11 -------- (2)
Note (1) is load the arm64_use_ng_mappings value in w8.
and (2) is set the text or data prot with the w8 value to set PTE_NG bit.
If .bss section doesn't initialized, x8 can include garbage value
-- In case of some platform, x8 loaded with 0xcf -- it could generate
wrong mapping. (i.e) text_prot is expected with
PAGE_KERNEL_ROX(0x0040000000000F83) but
with garbage x8 -- 0xcf, it sets with (0x0040000000067F83)
and This makes boot failure with translation fault.
This error cannot happen according to code generated by compiler.
here is the case of gcc:
ffff80008260a940 <__pi_create_init_idmap>:
ffff80008260a940: d100c3ff sub sp, sp, #0x30
ffff80008260a944: aa0003ed mov x13, x0
ffff80008260a948: 91400400 add x0, x0, #0x1, lsl #12 // =0x1000
ffff80008260a94c: a9017bfd stp x29, x30, [sp, #0x10]
ffff80008260a950: 910043fd add x29, sp, #0x10
ffff80008260a954: f90017e0 str x0, [sp, #0x28]
ffff80008260a958: d00048c0 adrp x0, 0xffff800082f24000 <reset_devices>
ffff80008260a95c: 394aa000 ldrb w0, [x0, #0x2a8]
ffff80008260a960: 37000640 tbnz w0, #0x0, 0xffff80008260aa28 <__pi_create_init_idmap+0xe8> ---(3)
ffff80008260a964: d280f060 mov x0, #0x783 // =1923
ffff80008260a968: d280e062 mov x2, #0x703 // =1795
ffff80008260a96c: f2e00800 movk x0, #0x40, lsl #48
ffff80008260a970: f2e00d02 movk x2, #0x68, lsl #48
ffff80008260a974: aa2103e4 mvn x4, x1
ffff80008260a978: 8a210049 bic x9, x2, x1
...
ffff80008260aa28: d281f060 mov x0, #0xf83 // =3971
ffff80008260aa2c: d281e062 mov x2, #0xf03 // =3843
ffff80008260aa30: f2e00800 movk x0, #0x40, lsl #48
In case of gcc, according to value of arm64_use_ng_mappings (annoated as(3)),
it branches to each prot settup code.
However this is also problem since it branches according to garbage
value too -- idmapping with wrong pgprot.
To resolve this, annotate arm64_use_ng_mappings as ro_after_init.
Fixes: 84b04d3e6bdb ("arm64: kernel: Create initial ID map from C code")
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 6.9.x
Signed-off-by: Yeoreum Yun <yeoreum.yun@arm.com>
---
There is another way to solve this problem by setting
test/data_prot with _PAGE_DEFAULT which doesn't include PTE_MAYBE_NG
with constanst check in create_init_idmap() to be free from
arm64_use_ng_mappings. but i think it would be better to change
arm64_use_ng_mappings as ro_after_init because it doesn't change after
init phase and solve this problem too.
---
arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c
index d2104a1e7843..967ffb1cbd52 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c
@@ -114,7 +114,7 @@ static struct arm64_cpu_capabilities const __ro_after_init *cpucap_ptrs[ARM64_NC
DECLARE_BITMAP(boot_cpucaps, ARM64_NCAPS);
-bool arm64_use_ng_mappings = false;
+bool arm64_use_ng_mappings __ro_after_init = false;
EXPORT_SYMBOL(arm64_use_ng_mappings);
DEFINE_PER_CPU_READ_MOSTLY(const char *, this_cpu_vector) = vectors;
--
LEVI:{C3F47F37-75D8-414A-A8BA-3980EC8A46D7}
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] arm64/cpufeature: annotate arm64_use_ng_mappings with ro_after_init to prevent wrong idmap generation
2025-05-02 14:57 [PATCH] arm64/cpufeature: annotate arm64_use_ng_mappings with ro_after_init to prevent wrong idmap generation Yeoreum Yun
@ 2025-05-02 16:25 ` Nathan Chancellor
2025-05-02 17:17 ` Yeoreum Yun
2025-05-02 16:41 ` Ard Biesheuvel
1 sibling, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread
From: Nathan Chancellor @ 2025-05-02 16:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Yeoreum Yun
Cc: catalin.marinas, will, nick.desaulniers+lkml, morbo, justinstitt,
broonie, maz, oliver.upton, frederic, joey.gouly, james.morse,
hardevsinh.palaniya, shameerali.kolothum.thodi, ardb,
ryan.roberts, linux-arm-kernel, linux-kernel, llvm, stable
Hi Yeoreum,
On Fri, May 02, 2025 at 03:57:55PM +0100, Yeoreum Yun wrote:
> create_init_idmap() could be called before .bss section initialization
> which is done in early_map_kernel() since data/test_prot could be set
> wrong for PTE_MAYBE_NG macro.
>
> PTE_MAYBE_NG macro is set according to value of "arm64_use_ng_mappings".
> and this variable is located in .bss section.
>
> # llvm-objdump-21 --syms vmlinux-gcc | grep arm64_use_ng_mappings
> ffff800082f242a8 g O .bss 0000000000000001 arm64_use_ng_mappings
>
> If .bss section doesn't initialized, "arm64_use_ng_mappings" would be set
> with garbage value ant then the text_prot or data_prot could be set
> with garbgae value.
>
> Here is what i saw with kernel compiled via llvm-21
>
> // create_init_idmap()
> ffff80008255c058: d10103ff sub sp, sp, #0x40
> ffff80008255c05c: a9017bfd stp x29, x30, [sp, #0x10]
> ffff80008255c060: a90257f6 stp x22, x21, [sp, #0x20]
> ffff80008255c064: a9034ff4 stp x20, x19, [sp, #0x30]
> ffff80008255c068: 910043fd add x29, sp, #0x10
> ffff80008255c06c: 90003fc8 adrp x8, 0xffff800082d54000
> ffff80008255c070: d280e06a mov x10, #0x703 // =1795
> ffff80008255c074: 91400409 add x9, x0, #0x1, lsl #12 // =0x1000
> ffff80008255c078: 394a4108 ldrb w8, [x8, #0x290] ------------- (1)
> ffff80008255c07c: f2e00d0a movk x10, #0x68, lsl #48
> ffff80008255c080: f90007e9 str x9, [sp, #0x8]
> ffff80008255c084: aa0103f3 mov x19, x1
> ffff80008255c088: aa0003f4 mov x20, x0
> ffff80008255c08c: 14000000 b 0xffff80008255c08c <__pi_create_init_idmap+0x34>
> ffff80008255c090: aa082d56 orr x22, x10, x8, lsl #11 -------- (2)
>
> Note (1) is load the arm64_use_ng_mappings value in w8.
> and (2) is set the text or data prot with the w8 value to set PTE_NG bit.
> If .bss section doesn't initialized, x8 can include garbage value
> -- In case of some platform, x8 loaded with 0xcf -- it could generate
> wrong mapping. (i.e) text_prot is expected with
> PAGE_KERNEL_ROX(0x0040000000000F83) but
> with garbage x8 -- 0xcf, it sets with (0x0040000000067F83)
> and This makes boot failure with translation fault.
>
> This error cannot happen according to code generated by compiler.
> here is the case of gcc:
>
> ffff80008260a940 <__pi_create_init_idmap>:
> ffff80008260a940: d100c3ff sub sp, sp, #0x30
> ffff80008260a944: aa0003ed mov x13, x0
> ffff80008260a948: 91400400 add x0, x0, #0x1, lsl #12 // =0x1000
> ffff80008260a94c: a9017bfd stp x29, x30, [sp, #0x10]
> ffff80008260a950: 910043fd add x29, sp, #0x10
> ffff80008260a954: f90017e0 str x0, [sp, #0x28]
> ffff80008260a958: d00048c0 adrp x0, 0xffff800082f24000 <reset_devices>
> ffff80008260a95c: 394aa000 ldrb w0, [x0, #0x2a8]
> ffff80008260a960: 37000640 tbnz w0, #0x0, 0xffff80008260aa28 <__pi_create_init_idmap+0xe8> ---(3)
> ffff80008260a964: d280f060 mov x0, #0x783 // =1923
> ffff80008260a968: d280e062 mov x2, #0x703 // =1795
> ffff80008260a96c: f2e00800 movk x0, #0x40, lsl #48
> ffff80008260a970: f2e00d02 movk x2, #0x68, lsl #48
> ffff80008260a974: aa2103e4 mvn x4, x1
> ffff80008260a978: 8a210049 bic x9, x2, x1
> ...
> ffff80008260aa28: d281f060 mov x0, #0xf83 // =3971
> ffff80008260aa2c: d281e062 mov x2, #0xf03 // =3843
> ffff80008260aa30: f2e00800 movk x0, #0x40, lsl #48
>
> In case of gcc, according to value of arm64_use_ng_mappings (annoated as(3)),
> it branches to each prot settup code.
> However this is also problem since it branches according to garbage
> value too -- idmapping with wrong pgprot.
>
> To resolve this, annotate arm64_use_ng_mappings as ro_after_init.
>
> Fixes: 84b04d3e6bdb ("arm64: kernel: Create initial ID map from C code")
> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 6.9.x
> Signed-off-by: Yeoreum Yun <yeoreum.yun@arm.com>
> ---
This appears to resolve the issue that I reported to LLVM upstream:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/138019
Tested-by: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>
It does not look like there is anything for the compiler to fix in this
case, correct?
> ---
> arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c
> index d2104a1e7843..967ffb1cbd52 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c
> @@ -114,7 +114,7 @@ static struct arm64_cpu_capabilities const __ro_after_init *cpucap_ptrs[ARM64_NC
>
> DECLARE_BITMAP(boot_cpucaps, ARM64_NCAPS);
>
> -bool arm64_use_ng_mappings = false;
> +bool arm64_use_ng_mappings __ro_after_init = false;
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(arm64_use_ng_mappings);
>
> DEFINE_PER_CPU_READ_MOSTLY(const char *, this_cpu_vector) = vectors;
> --
> LEVI:{C3F47F37-75D8-414A-A8BA-3980EC8A46D7}
>
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] arm64/cpufeature: annotate arm64_use_ng_mappings with ro_after_init to prevent wrong idmap generation
2025-05-02 14:57 [PATCH] arm64/cpufeature: annotate arm64_use_ng_mappings with ro_after_init to prevent wrong idmap generation Yeoreum Yun
2025-05-02 16:25 ` Nathan Chancellor
@ 2025-05-02 16:41 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2025-05-02 17:23 ` Yeoreum Yun
2025-05-02 17:57 ` Catalin Marinas
1 sibling, 2 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Ard Biesheuvel @ 2025-05-02 16:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Yeoreum Yun
Cc: catalin.marinas, will, nathan, nick.desaulniers+lkml, morbo,
justinstitt, broonie, maz, oliver.upton, frederic, joey.gouly,
james.morse, hardevsinh.palaniya, shameerali.kolothum.thodi,
ryan.roberts, linux-arm-kernel, linux-kernel, llvm, stable
On Fri, 2 May 2025 at 16:58, Yeoreum Yun <yeoreum.yun@arm.com> wrote:
>
> create_init_idmap() could be called before .bss section initialization
> which is done in early_map_kernel() since data/test_prot could be set
> wrong for PTE_MAYBE_NG macro.
>
> PTE_MAYBE_NG macro is set according to value of "arm64_use_ng_mappings".
> and this variable is located in .bss section.
>
> # llvm-objdump-21 --syms vmlinux-gcc | grep arm64_use_ng_mappings
> ffff800082f242a8 g O .bss 0000000000000001 arm64_use_ng_mappings
>
> If .bss section doesn't initialized, "arm64_use_ng_mappings" would be set
> with garbage value ant then the text_prot or data_prot could be set
> with garbgae value.
>
> Here is what i saw with kernel compiled via llvm-21
>
> // create_init_idmap()
> ffff80008255c058: d10103ff sub sp, sp, #0x40
> ffff80008255c05c: a9017bfd stp x29, x30, [sp, #0x10]
> ffff80008255c060: a90257f6 stp x22, x21, [sp, #0x20]
> ffff80008255c064: a9034ff4 stp x20, x19, [sp, #0x30]
> ffff80008255c068: 910043fd add x29, sp, #0x10
> ffff80008255c06c: 90003fc8 adrp x8, 0xffff800082d54000
> ffff80008255c070: d280e06a mov x10, #0x703 // =1795
> ffff80008255c074: 91400409 add x9, x0, #0x1, lsl #12 // =0x1000
> ffff80008255c078: 394a4108 ldrb w8, [x8, #0x290] ------------- (1)
> ffff80008255c07c: f2e00d0a movk x10, #0x68, lsl #48
> ffff80008255c080: f90007e9 str x9, [sp, #0x8]
> ffff80008255c084: aa0103f3 mov x19, x1
> ffff80008255c088: aa0003f4 mov x20, x0
> ffff80008255c08c: 14000000 b 0xffff80008255c08c <__pi_create_init_idmap+0x34>
> ffff80008255c090: aa082d56 orr x22, x10, x8, lsl #11 -------- (2)
>
Interesting. So Clang just shifts the value of "arm64_use_ng_mappings"
into bit #11, on the basis that 'bool' is a u8 that can only hold
values 0 or 1.
It is actually kind of nice that this happened, or we would likely
have never found out - setting nG inadvertently on the initial ID map
is not something one would ever notice in practice.
...
>
> In case of gcc, according to value of arm64_use_ng_mappings (annoated as(3)),
> it branches to each prot settup code.
> However this is also problem since it branches according to garbage
> value too -- idmapping with wrong pgprot.
>
I think the only way to deal with this in a robust manner is to never
call C code before clearing BSS. But this would mean clearing BSS
before setting up the ID map, which means it will run with the caches
disabled, making it slower and also making it necessary to perform
cache invalidation afterwards.
Making arm64_use_ng_mappings __ro_after_init seems like a useful
change by itself, so I am not objecting to that. But we don't solve it
more fundamentally, please at least add a big fat comment why it is
important that the variable remains there.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] arm64/cpufeature: annotate arm64_use_ng_mappings with ro_after_init to prevent wrong idmap generation
2025-05-02 16:25 ` Nathan Chancellor
@ 2025-05-02 17:17 ` Yeoreum Yun
0 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Yeoreum Yun @ 2025-05-02 17:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Nathan Chancellor
Cc: catalin.marinas, will, nick.desaulniers+lkml, morbo, justinstitt,
broonie, maz, oliver.upton, frederic, joey.gouly, james.morse,
hardevsinh.palaniya, shameerali.kolothum.thodi, ardb,
ryan.roberts, linux-arm-kernel, linux-kernel, llvm, stable
Hi Nathan,
> Hi Yeoreum,
>
> On Fri, May 02, 2025 at 03:57:55PM +0100, Yeoreum Yun wrote:
> > create_init_idmap() could be called before .bss section initialization
> > which is done in early_map_kernel() since data/test_prot could be set
> > wrong for PTE_MAYBE_NG macro.
> >
> > PTE_MAYBE_NG macro is set according to value of "arm64_use_ng_mappings".
> > and this variable is located in .bss section.
> >
> > # llvm-objdump-21 --syms vmlinux-gcc | grep arm64_use_ng_mappings
> > ffff800082f242a8 g O .bss 0000000000000001 arm64_use_ng_mappings
> >
> > If .bss section doesn't initialized, "arm64_use_ng_mappings" would be set
> > with garbage value ant then the text_prot or data_prot could be set
> > with garbgae value.
> >
> > Here is what i saw with kernel compiled via llvm-21
> >
> > // create_init_idmap()
> > ffff80008255c058: d10103ff sub sp, sp, #0x40
> > ffff80008255c05c: a9017bfd stp x29, x30, [sp, #0x10]
> > ffff80008255c060: a90257f6 stp x22, x21, [sp, #0x20]
> > ffff80008255c064: a9034ff4 stp x20, x19, [sp, #0x30]
> > ffff80008255c068: 910043fd add x29, sp, #0x10
> > ffff80008255c06c: 90003fc8 adrp x8, 0xffff800082d54000
> > ffff80008255c070: d280e06a mov x10, #0x703 // =1795
> > ffff80008255c074: 91400409 add x9, x0, #0x1, lsl #12 // =0x1000
> > ffff80008255c078: 394a4108 ldrb w8, [x8, #0x290] ------------- (1)
> > ffff80008255c07c: f2e00d0a movk x10, #0x68, lsl #48
> > ffff80008255c080: f90007e9 str x9, [sp, #0x8]
> > ffff80008255c084: aa0103f3 mov x19, x1
> > ffff80008255c088: aa0003f4 mov x20, x0
> > ffff80008255c08c: 14000000 b 0xffff80008255c08c <__pi_create_init_idmap+0x34>
> > ffff80008255c090: aa082d56 orr x22, x10, x8, lsl #11 -------- (2)
> >
> > Note (1) is load the arm64_use_ng_mappings value in w8.
> > and (2) is set the text or data prot with the w8 value to set PTE_NG bit.
> > If .bss section doesn't initialized, x8 can include garbage value
> > -- In case of some platform, x8 loaded with 0xcf -- it could generate
> > wrong mapping. (i.e) text_prot is expected with
> > PAGE_KERNEL_ROX(0x0040000000000F83) but
> > with garbage x8 -- 0xcf, it sets with (0x0040000000067F83)
> > and This makes boot failure with translation fault.
> >
> > This error cannot happen according to code generated by compiler.
> > here is the case of gcc:
> >
> > ffff80008260a940 <__pi_create_init_idmap>:
> > ffff80008260a940: d100c3ff sub sp, sp, #0x30
> > ffff80008260a944: aa0003ed mov x13, x0
> > ffff80008260a948: 91400400 add x0, x0, #0x1, lsl #12 // =0x1000
> > ffff80008260a94c: a9017bfd stp x29, x30, [sp, #0x10]
> > ffff80008260a950: 910043fd add x29, sp, #0x10
> > ffff80008260a954: f90017e0 str x0, [sp, #0x28]
> > ffff80008260a958: d00048c0 adrp x0, 0xffff800082f24000 <reset_devices>
> > ffff80008260a95c: 394aa000 ldrb w0, [x0, #0x2a8]
> > ffff80008260a960: 37000640 tbnz w0, #0x0, 0xffff80008260aa28 <__pi_create_init_idmap+0xe8> ---(3)
> > ffff80008260a964: d280f060 mov x0, #0x783 // =1923
> > ffff80008260a968: d280e062 mov x2, #0x703 // =1795
> > ffff80008260a96c: f2e00800 movk x0, #0x40, lsl #48
> > ffff80008260a970: f2e00d02 movk x2, #0x68, lsl #48
> > ffff80008260a974: aa2103e4 mvn x4, x1
> > ffff80008260a978: 8a210049 bic x9, x2, x1
> > ...
> > ffff80008260aa28: d281f060 mov x0, #0xf83 // =3971
> > ffff80008260aa2c: d281e062 mov x2, #0xf03 // =3843
> > ffff80008260aa30: f2e00800 movk x0, #0x40, lsl #48
> >
> > In case of gcc, according to value of arm64_use_ng_mappings (annoated as(3)),
> > it branches to each prot settup code.
>
> > However this is also problem since it branches according to garbage
> > value too -- idmapping with wrong pgprot.
> >
> > To resolve this, annotate arm64_use_ng_mappings as ro_after_init.
> >
> > Fixes: 84b04d3e6bdb ("arm64: kernel: Create initial ID map from C code")
> > Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 6.9.x
> > Signed-off-by: Yeoreum Yun <yeoreum.yun@arm.com>
> > ---
>
> This appears to resolve the issue that I reported to LLVM upstream:
>
> https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/138019
>
> Tested-by: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>
>
> It does not look like there is anything for the compiler to fix in this
> case, correct?
No. There's no need any change in compiler.
Thanks!
>
> > ---
> > arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c | 2 +-
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c
> > index d2104a1e7843..967ffb1cbd52 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c
> > +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c
> > @@ -114,7 +114,7 @@ static struct arm64_cpu_capabilities const __ro_after_init *cpucap_ptrs[ARM64_NC
> >
> > DECLARE_BITMAP(boot_cpucaps, ARM64_NCAPS);
> >
> > -bool arm64_use_ng_mappings = false;
> > +bool arm64_use_ng_mappings __ro_after_init = false;
> > EXPORT_SYMBOL(arm64_use_ng_mappings);
> >
> > DEFINE_PER_CPU_READ_MOSTLY(const char *, this_cpu_vector) = vectors;
> > --
> > LEVI:{C3F47F37-75D8-414A-A8BA-3980EC8A46D7}
> >
> >
--
Sincerely,
Yeoreum Yun
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] arm64/cpufeature: annotate arm64_use_ng_mappings with ro_after_init to prevent wrong idmap generation
2025-05-02 16:41 ` Ard Biesheuvel
@ 2025-05-02 17:23 ` Yeoreum Yun
2025-05-02 17:57 ` Catalin Marinas
1 sibling, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Yeoreum Yun @ 2025-05-02 17:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Ard Biesheuvel
Cc: catalin.marinas, will, nathan, nick.desaulniers+lkml, morbo,
justinstitt, broonie, maz, oliver.upton, frederic, joey.gouly,
james.morse, hardevsinh.palaniya, shameerali.kolothum.thodi,
ryan.roberts, linux-arm-kernel, linux-kernel, llvm, stable
Hi Ard,
> On Fri, 2 May 2025 at 16:58, Yeoreum Yun <yeoreum.yun@arm.com> wrote:
> >
> > create_init_idmap() could be called before .bss section initialization
> > which is done in early_map_kernel() since data/test_prot could be set
> > wrong for PTE_MAYBE_NG macro.
> >
> > PTE_MAYBE_NG macro is set according to value of "arm64_use_ng_mappings".
> > and this variable is located in .bss section.
> >
> > # llvm-objdump-21 --syms vmlinux-gcc | grep arm64_use_ng_mappings
> > ffff800082f242a8 g O .bss 0000000000000001 arm64_use_ng_mappings
> >
> > If .bss section doesn't initialized, "arm64_use_ng_mappings" would be set
> > with garbage value ant then the text_prot or data_prot could be set
> > with garbgae value.
> >
> > Here is what i saw with kernel compiled via llvm-21
> >
> > // create_init_idmap()
> > ffff80008255c058: d10103ff sub sp, sp, #0x40
> > ffff80008255c05c: a9017bfd stp x29, x30, [sp, #0x10]
> > ffff80008255c060: a90257f6 stp x22, x21, [sp, #0x20]
> > ffff80008255c064: a9034ff4 stp x20, x19, [sp, #0x30]
> > ffff80008255c068: 910043fd add x29, sp, #0x10
> > ffff80008255c06c: 90003fc8 adrp x8, 0xffff800082d54000
> > ffff80008255c070: d280e06a mov x10, #0x703 // =1795
> > ffff80008255c074: 91400409 add x9, x0, #0x1, lsl #12 // =0x1000
> > ffff80008255c078: 394a4108 ldrb w8, [x8, #0x290] ------------- (1)
> > ffff80008255c07c: f2e00d0a movk x10, #0x68, lsl #48
> > ffff80008255c080: f90007e9 str x9, [sp, #0x8]
> > ffff80008255c084: aa0103f3 mov x19, x1
> > ffff80008255c088: aa0003f4 mov x20, x0
> > ffff80008255c08c: 14000000 b 0xffff80008255c08c <__pi_create_init_idmap+0x34>
> > ffff80008255c090: aa082d56 orr x22, x10, x8, lsl #11 -------- (2)
> >
>
> Interesting. So Clang just shifts the value of "arm64_use_ng_mappings"
> into bit #11, on the basis that 'bool' is a u8 that can only hold
> values 0 or 1.
>
> It is actually kind of nice that this happened, or we would likely
> have never found out - setting nG inadvertently on the initial ID map
> is not something one would ever notice in practice.
> ...
Yeap. it's a quite nice and funny :D
> >
> > In case of gcc, according to value of arm64_use_ng_mappings (annoated as(3)),
> > it branches to each prot settup code.
> > However this is also problem since it branches according to garbage
> > value too -- idmapping with wrong pgprot.
> >
>
> I think the only way to deal with this in a robust manner is to never
> call C code before clearing BSS. But this would mean clearing BSS
> before setting up the ID map, which means it will run with the caches
> disabled, making it slower and also making it necessary to perform
> cache invalidation afterwards.
>
> Making arm64_use_ng_mappings __ro_after_init seems like a useful
> change by itself, so I am not objecting to that. But we don't solve it
> more fundamentally, please at least add a big fat comment why it is
> important that the variable remains there.
Agree. I'll add the comment on arm64_use_ng_mapping.
Thanks!
--
Sincerely,
Yeoreum Yun
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] arm64/cpufeature: annotate arm64_use_ng_mappings with ro_after_init to prevent wrong idmap generation
2025-05-02 16:41 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2025-05-02 17:23 ` Yeoreum Yun
@ 2025-05-02 17:57 ` Catalin Marinas
2025-05-02 18:14 ` Yeoreum Yun
1 sibling, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread
From: Catalin Marinas @ 2025-05-02 17:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Ard Biesheuvel
Cc: Yeoreum Yun, will, nathan, nick.desaulniers+lkml, morbo,
justinstitt, broonie, maz, oliver.upton, frederic, joey.gouly,
james.morse, hardevsinh.palaniya, shameerali.kolothum.thodi,
ryan.roberts, linux-arm-kernel, linux-kernel, llvm, stable
On Fri, May 02, 2025 at 06:41:33PM +0200, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> Making arm64_use_ng_mappings __ro_after_init seems like a useful
> change by itself, so I am not objecting to that. But we don't solve it
> more fundamentally, please at least add a big fat comment why it is
> important that the variable remains there.
Maybe something like the section reference checker we use for __init -
verify that the early C code does not refer anything in the BSS section.
--
Catalin
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] arm64/cpufeature: annotate arm64_use_ng_mappings with ro_after_init to prevent wrong idmap generation
2025-05-02 17:57 ` Catalin Marinas
@ 2025-05-02 18:14 ` Yeoreum Yun
2025-05-03 10:06 ` Catalin Marinas
0 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread
From: Yeoreum Yun @ 2025-05-02 18:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Catalin Marinas
Cc: Ard Biesheuvel, will, nathan, nick.desaulniers+lkml, morbo,
justinstitt, broonie, maz, oliver.upton, frederic, joey.gouly,
james.morse, hardevsinh.palaniya, shameerali.kolothum.thodi,
ryan.roberts, linux-arm-kernel, linux-kernel, llvm, stable
> On Fri, May 02, 2025 at 06:41:33PM +0200, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> > Making arm64_use_ng_mappings __ro_after_init seems like a useful
> > change by itself, so I am not objecting to that. But we don't solve it
> > more fundamentally, please at least add a big fat comment why it is
> > important that the variable remains there.
>
> Maybe something like the section reference checker we use for __init -
> verify that the early C code does not refer anything in the BSS section.
Maybe but it would be better to be checked at compile time (I don't
know it's possible) otherwise, early C code writer should check
mandatroy by calling is_kernel_bss_data() (not exist) for data it refers.
> --
> Catalin
--
Sincerely,
Yeoreum Yun
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] arm64/cpufeature: annotate arm64_use_ng_mappings with ro_after_init to prevent wrong idmap generation
2025-05-02 18:14 ` Yeoreum Yun
@ 2025-05-03 10:06 ` Catalin Marinas
2025-05-03 11:22 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2025-05-03 14:52 ` Yeoreum Yun
0 siblings, 2 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Catalin Marinas @ 2025-05-03 10:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Yeoreum Yun
Cc: Ard Biesheuvel, will, nathan, nick.desaulniers+lkml, morbo,
justinstitt, broonie, maz, oliver.upton, frederic, joey.gouly,
james.morse, hardevsinh.palaniya, shameerali.kolothum.thodi,
ryan.roberts, linux-arm-kernel, linux-kernel, llvm, stable
On Fri, May 02, 2025 at 07:14:12PM +0100, Yeoreum Yun wrote:
> > On Fri, May 02, 2025 at 06:41:33PM +0200, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> > > Making arm64_use_ng_mappings __ro_after_init seems like a useful
> > > change by itself, so I am not objecting to that. But we don't solve it
> > > more fundamentally, please at least add a big fat comment why it is
> > > important that the variable remains there.
> >
> > Maybe something like the section reference checker we use for __init -
> > verify that the early C code does not refer anything in the BSS section.
>
> Maybe but it would be better to be checked at compile time (I don't
> know it's possible) otherwise, early C code writer should check
> mandatroy by calling is_kernel_bss_data() (not exist) for data it refers.
This would be compile time (or rather final link time). See
scripts/mod/modpost.c (the sectioncheck[] array) on how we check if, for
example, a .text section references a .init one. We could move the whole
pi code to its own section (e.g. .init.nommu.*) and add modpost checks
for references to the bss or other sections.
--
Catalin
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] arm64/cpufeature: annotate arm64_use_ng_mappings with ro_after_init to prevent wrong idmap generation
2025-05-03 10:06 ` Catalin Marinas
@ 2025-05-03 11:22 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2025-05-03 14:52 ` Yeoreum Yun
1 sibling, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Ard Biesheuvel @ 2025-05-03 11:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Catalin Marinas
Cc: Yeoreum Yun, will, nathan, nick.desaulniers+lkml, morbo,
justinstitt, broonie, maz, oliver.upton, frederic, joey.gouly,
james.morse, hardevsinh.palaniya, shameerali.kolothum.thodi,
ryan.roberts, linux-arm-kernel, linux-kernel, llvm, stable
On Sat, 3 May 2025 at 12:06, Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> wrote:
>
> On Fri, May 02, 2025 at 07:14:12PM +0100, Yeoreum Yun wrote:
> > > On Fri, May 02, 2025 at 06:41:33PM +0200, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> > > > Making arm64_use_ng_mappings __ro_after_init seems like a useful
> > > > change by itself, so I am not objecting to that. But we don't solve it
> > > > more fundamentally, please at least add a big fat comment why it is
> > > > important that the variable remains there.
> > >
> > > Maybe something like the section reference checker we use for __init -
> > > verify that the early C code does not refer anything in the BSS section.
> >
> > Maybe but it would be better to be checked at compile time (I don't
> > know it's possible) otherwise, early C code writer should check
> > mandatroy by calling is_kernel_bss_data() (not exist) for data it refers.
>
> This would be compile time (or rather final link time). See
> scripts/mod/modpost.c (the sectioncheck[] array) on how we check if, for
> example, a .text section references a .init one. We could move the whole
> pi code to its own section (e.g. .init.nommu.*) and add modpost checks
> for references to the bss or other sections.
>
We can take care of this locally in image-vars.h, where each variable
used by the startup code is made available to it explicitly.
Sending out a separate series shortly.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] arm64/cpufeature: annotate arm64_use_ng_mappings with ro_after_init to prevent wrong idmap generation
2025-05-03 10:06 ` Catalin Marinas
2025-05-03 11:22 ` Ard Biesheuvel
@ 2025-05-03 14:52 ` Yeoreum Yun
1 sibling, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Yeoreum Yun @ 2025-05-03 14:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Catalin Marinas
Cc: Ard Biesheuvel, will, nathan, nick.desaulniers+lkml, morbo,
justinstitt, broonie, maz, oliver.upton, frederic, joey.gouly,
james.morse, hardevsinh.palaniya, shameerali.kolothum.thodi,
ryan.roberts, linux-arm-kernel, linux-kernel, llvm, stable
On Sat, May 03, 2025 at 11:06:03AM +0100, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> On Fri, May 02, 2025 at 07:14:12PM +0100, Yeoreum Yun wrote:
> > > On Fri, May 02, 2025 at 06:41:33PM +0200, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> > > > Making arm64_use_ng_mappings __ro_after_init seems like a useful
> > > > change by itself, so I am not objecting to that. But we don't solve it
> > > > more fundamentally, please at least add a big fat comment why it is
> > > > important that the variable remains there.
> > >
> > > Maybe something like the section reference checker we use for __init -
> > > verify that the early C code does not refer anything in the BSS section.
> >
> > Maybe but it would be better to be checked at compile time (I don't
> > know it's possible) otherwise, early C code writer should check
> > mandatroy by calling is_kernel_bss_data() (not exist) for data it refers.
>
> This would be compile time (or rather final link time). See
> scripts/mod/modpost.c (the sectioncheck[] array) on how we check if, for
> example, a .text section references a .init one. We could move the whole
> pi code to its own section (e.g. .init.nommu.*) and add modpost checks
> for references to the bss or other sections.
Oh, only thought about some compiler option.
and Thanks to let me know!
> --
> Catalin
--
Sincerely,
Yeoreum Yun
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2025-05-03 14:56 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2025-05-02 14:57 [PATCH] arm64/cpufeature: annotate arm64_use_ng_mappings with ro_after_init to prevent wrong idmap generation Yeoreum Yun
2025-05-02 16:25 ` Nathan Chancellor
2025-05-02 17:17 ` Yeoreum Yun
2025-05-02 16:41 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2025-05-02 17:23 ` Yeoreum Yun
2025-05-02 17:57 ` Catalin Marinas
2025-05-02 18:14 ` Yeoreum Yun
2025-05-03 10:06 ` Catalin Marinas
2025-05-03 11:22 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2025-05-03 14:52 ` Yeoreum Yun
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).