From: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org>
To: Xiaolei Wang <xiaolei.wang@windriver.com>
Cc: andersson@kernel.org, shawnguo@kernel.org,
s.hauer@pengutronix.de, kernel@pengutronix.de,
festevam@gmail.com, linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org,
imx@lists.linux.dev, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/2] Fix two memory leaks in rproc_attach()
Date: Tue, 6 May 2025 11:28:29 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aBpGvZ4U6VFpu1gl@p14s> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250430092043.1819308-1-xiaolei.wang@windriver.com>
On Wed, Apr 30, 2025 at 05:20:41PM +0800, Xiaolei Wang wrote:
> In the rproc_attach() function, if rproc_handle_resources() returns
> failure, the resources requested in imx_rproc_prepare() should be
> released, since almost the same thing is done in imx_rproc_prepare() and
> rproc_resource_cleanup(), Function rproc_resource_cleanup() is able
> to deal with empty lists so it is better to fix the "goto" statements
> in rproc_attach(). replace the "unprepare_device" goto statement with
> "clean_up_resources" and get rid of the "unprepare_device" label.
> and rproc->clean_table should also be released
>
> Changes in v3:
> Update patch1, replace the "unprepare_device" goto statement with
> "clean_up_resources" and get rid of the "unprepare_device" label.
>
> V2:
> Updated the commit log of these two patches
> https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-remoteproc/patch/20250426065348.1234391-2-xiaolei.wang@windriver.com/
> https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-remoteproc/patch/20250426065348.1234391-3-xiaolei.wang@windriver.com/
>
> V1: https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-remoteproc/patch/20250424122252.2777363-1-xiaolei.wang@windriver.com/
> https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-remoteproc/patch/20250424122252.2777363-2-xiaolei.wang@windriver.com/
>
> Xiaolei Wang (2):
> remoteproc: cleanup acquired resources when rproc_handle_resources()
> fails in rproc_attach()
> remoteproc: core: release rproc->clean_table after rproc_attach()
> fails
>
> drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c | 6 +++---
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
I have applied this patchset.
Thanks,
Mathieu
> --
> 2.25.1
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-05-06 22:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-04-30 9:20 [PATCH v3 0/2] Fix two memory leaks in rproc_attach() Xiaolei Wang
2025-04-30 9:20 ` [PATCH v3 1/2] remoteproc: cleanup acquired resources when rproc_handle_resources() fails " Xiaolei Wang
2025-04-30 9:20 ` [PATCH v3 2/2] remoteproc: core: release rproc->clean_table after rproc_attach() fails Xiaolei Wang
2025-05-06 8:56 ` [PATCH v3 0/2] Fix two memory leaks in rproc_attach() Peng Fan
2025-05-06 17:28 ` Mathieu Poirier [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aBpGvZ4U6VFpu1gl@p14s \
--to=mathieu.poirier@linaro.org \
--cc=andersson@kernel.org \
--cc=festevam@gmail.com \
--cc=imx@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=kernel@pengutronix.de \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=s.hauer@pengutronix.de \
--cc=shawnguo@kernel.org \
--cc=xiaolei.wang@windriver.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).