Re: [PATCH v8 4/9] mfd: bcm590xx: Add support for multiple device types + BCM59054 compatible

Mark Brown
2025-05-15T08:06:57Z

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 941 bytes --]

On Thu, May 15, 2025 at 08:13:57AM +0100, Lee Jones wrote:
> On Wed, 14 May 2025, Mark Brown wrote:

> > Could you be more explicit what you're looking for here, the diffstat is
> > entirely MFD?

> Okay, more explicitly, I can merge this and MFD will have no issue.
> However, the Regulator commits make use of 'pmu_id' introduced in this
> change and would therefore cause a compile break. So we could:

> 1. Apply this now and merge the dependents next cycle
> 2. Apply this now and provide an IB
> 3. Wait for all Acks and apply as a unified set

> We usually choose 3, hence my assumptions above.

Well, you choose 3 - I do think it'd be a lot easier to go with option
2, or with applying the rest to your tree as acks come in. There seemed
to still be a reasonable amount of discussion on the MFD bits (eg,
there's some formatting comments still) so I was expecting this series
to churn some more and was waiting for a resend.

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]