From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 90020C2D0CD for ; Wed, 21 May 2025 16:44:23 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender:List-Subscribe:List-Help :List-Post:List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:Content-Type: MIME-Version:References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=nqV3lRwJwEi5A0n42n94rqiFtoc8WGmVMSwJFR2qgmU=; b=eXsPlztzBmpN9aOQHZZ+CRb4Ks WkAk/pOIlUfhmXh7Z2FNhJRMqrIdXzYcc0K/UJq6/nh2f97GyskDmMnxFmDs5MxsgJZ+hgkDXAP1c nO8SjCO8C7D8azyNrvb9knNqo3TrqlSUgNddE4hMt7tSXKRu6+VNfMJKBjkT8Wgw/7JhvoqPGLtlV 8k6/uBaoOF1obigwDkqWySOQ8823LZznJl46kr0FRdKQT993F1BzWyZcEYt0uhr8qHTxssPpuvWsN e53ANvELzoz+FLC7slWF8qezrJPOzuc3krkdo0rJCrZNa3YhANzYstoJvOhkGJQxMo3910LH78J0+ pULTBHgg==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.98.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1uHmYD-0000000GUaV-1a0r; Wed, 21 May 2025 16:44:17 +0000 Received: from sea.source.kernel.org ([2600:3c0a:e001:78e:0:1991:8:25]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.98.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1uHmW3-0000000GULy-1rbx for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Wed, 21 May 2025 16:42:04 +0000 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (transwarp.subspace.kernel.org [100.75.92.58]) by sea.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EDDBB4496E; Wed, 21 May 2025 16:42:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4C091C4CEE4; Wed, 21 May 2025 16:42:01 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1747845721; bh=fNlJI98IRmJku5DUDB7KU0NTAR5l/AoBK5dNhkMKy3I=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=W5UxbfYHZeoYDuN5ngewjlWzVx7fvv+BRtndc80ovjhiG8g1I0PHO5ybTj6Lu6x7z g36JHRBWYtNWkCBo4PMkcy0oVlBeyMphixat7L/44FREl/Q339WNexmioK64JLpHrr ovP+rgZvQ9g6LwFcH/HDCu9vpS3tLCd/GJAcQWnttlw4kKAxt0ie+p9RLIYWYKjjhH 93rSYCm1Z1xfN5fXmFJkD1WSt0TC4uayOcstPRMB2i+aKB06sSd7LdyWxS+W5yFd8X bdNdzs+Y/THmEK3YDLZn9UkbD1V8YTXfyH5h5kHwmICgedMJsRAjUNUWn2aXZj8rj/ RKYVBmYwmsZHw== Date: Wed, 21 May 2025 19:41:57 +0300 From: Jarkko Sakkinen To: Stefano Garzarella Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, Peter Huewe , Jens Wiklander , linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org, Alexandre Belloni , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Nicolas Ferre , Nicholas Piggin , Sumit Garg , James Bottomley , Claudiu Beznea , Madhavan Srinivasan , Jason Gunthorpe , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Christophe Leroy , Naveen N Rao , Michael Ellerman Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 4/4] tpm/tpm_svsm: support TPM_CHIP_FLAG_SYNC Message-ID: References: <20250514134630.137621-1-sgarzare@redhat.com> <20250514134630.137621-5-sgarzare@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20250521_094203_501134_440BD1D3 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 16.50 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Wed, May 21, 2025 at 01:12:20PM +0300, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote: > > I tried, but the last patch (this one) is based on the series merged > > on the tip tree, where I introduced tpm_svsm. > > I can see that series in linux-next merged with commit > > 16a56ee59ab8ee05e67de35bbb5782ef9cfb4f07, > > but I can't see it in your next tree [1]. > > > > How do we proceed in such cases? > > > > Just to be sure, did I use the right tree? > > Thanks for the remark. Lemme check tonight. Hold on doing > anything ;-) We'll get there... I just rebased my branches on top of latest from Linus. That is what I need base PR also on, and: $ git show 16a56ee59ab8ee05e67de35bbb5782ef9cfb4f07 fatal: bad object 16a56ee59ab8ee05e67de35bbb5782ef9cfb4f07 I'd use git cherry-pick on a range to take them from linux-next to a mainline tip... BR, Jarkko