linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sumit Garg <sumit.garg@kernel.org>
To: Jens Wiklander <jens.wiklander@linaro.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-media@vger.kernel.org,
	dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, linaro-mm-sig@lists.linaro.org,
	op-tee@lists.trustedfirmware.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	"Olivier Masse" <olivier.masse@nxp.com>,
	"Thierry Reding" <thierry.reding@gmail.com>,
	"Yong Wu" <yong.wu@mediatek.com>,
	"Sumit Semwal" <sumit.semwal@linaro.org>,
	"Benjamin Gaignard" <benjamin.gaignard@collabora.com>,
	"Brian Starkey" <Brian.Starkey@arm.com>,
	"John Stultz" <jstultz@google.com>,
	"T . J . Mercier" <tjmercier@google.com>,
	"Christian König" <christian.koenig@amd.com>,
	"Matthias Brugger" <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>,
	"AngeloGioacchino Del Regno"
	<angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com>,
	azarrabi@qti.qualcomm.com,
	"Simona Vetter" <simona.vetter@ffwll.ch>,
	"Daniel Stone" <daniel@fooishbar.org>,
	"Rouven Czerwinski" <rouven.czerwinski@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 7/9] optee: support protected memory allocation
Date: Mon, 26 May 2025 13:03:11 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <aDQZN-frPnr1_N5I@sumit-X1> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250520152436.474778-8-jens.wiklander@linaro.org>

On Tue, May 20, 2025 at 05:16:50PM +0200, Jens Wiklander wrote:
> Add support in the OP-TEE backend driver for protected memory
> allocation. The support is limited to only the SMC ABI and for secure
> video buffers.
> 
> OP-TEE is probed for the range of protected physical memory and a
> memory pool allocator is initialized if OP-TEE have support for such
> memory.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jens Wiklander <jens.wiklander@linaro.org>
> ---
>  drivers/tee/optee/core.c          | 10 +++++++
>  drivers/tee/optee/optee_private.h |  2 ++
>  drivers/tee/optee/smc_abi.c       | 45 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
>  3 files changed, 55 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/tee/optee/core.c b/drivers/tee/optee/core.c
> index c75fddc83576..4b14a7ac56f9 100644
> --- a/drivers/tee/optee/core.c
> +++ b/drivers/tee/optee/core.c
> @@ -56,6 +56,15 @@ int optee_rpmb_intf_rdev(struct notifier_block *intf, unsigned long action,
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  
> +int optee_set_dma_mask(struct optee *optee, u_int pa_width)
> +{
> +	u64 mask = DMA_BIT_MASK(min(64, pa_width));
> +
> +	optee->teedev->dev.dma_mask = &optee->teedev->dev.coherent_dma_mask;
> +
> +	return dma_set_mask_and_coherent(&optee->teedev->dev, mask);
> +}
> +
>  static void optee_bus_scan(struct work_struct *work)
>  {
>  	WARN_ON(optee_enumerate_devices(PTA_CMD_GET_DEVICES_SUPP));
> @@ -181,6 +190,7 @@ void optee_remove_common(struct optee *optee)
>  	tee_device_unregister(optee->supp_teedev);
>  	tee_device_unregister(optee->teedev);
>  
> +	tee_device_unregister_all_dma_heaps(optee->teedev);
>  	tee_shm_pool_free(optee->pool);
>  	optee_supp_uninit(&optee->supp);
>  	mutex_destroy(&optee->call_queue.mutex);
> diff --git a/drivers/tee/optee/optee_private.h b/drivers/tee/optee/optee_private.h
> index dc0f355ef72a..5e3c34802121 100644
> --- a/drivers/tee/optee/optee_private.h
> +++ b/drivers/tee/optee/optee_private.h
> @@ -272,6 +272,8 @@ struct optee_call_ctx {
>  
>  extern struct blocking_notifier_head optee_rpmb_intf_added;
>  
> +int optee_set_dma_mask(struct optee *optee, u_int pa_width);
> +
>  int optee_notif_init(struct optee *optee, u_int max_key);
>  void optee_notif_uninit(struct optee *optee);
>  int optee_notif_wait(struct optee *optee, u_int key, u32 timeout);
> diff --git a/drivers/tee/optee/smc_abi.c b/drivers/tee/optee/smc_abi.c
> index f0c3ac1103bb..f3cae8243785 100644
> --- a/drivers/tee/optee/smc_abi.c
> +++ b/drivers/tee/optee/smc_abi.c
> @@ -1584,6 +1584,42 @@ static inline int optee_load_fw(struct platform_device *pdev,
>  }
>  #endif
>  
> +static int optee_protmem_pool_init(struct optee *optee)
> +{
> +	enum tee_dma_heap_id heap_id = TEE_DMA_HEAP_SECURE_VIDEO_PLAY;
> +	struct tee_protmem_pool *pool;
> +	int rc;
> +
> +	if (optee->smc.sec_caps & OPTEE_SMC_SEC_CAP_PROTMEM) {
> +		union {
> +			struct arm_smccc_res smccc;
> +			struct optee_smc_get_protmem_config_result result;
> +		} res;
> +
> +		optee->smc.invoke_fn(OPTEE_SMC_GET_PROTMEM_CONFIG, 0, 0, 0, 0,
> +				     0, 0, 0, &res.smccc);
> +		if (res.result.status != OPTEE_SMC_RETURN_OK) {
> +			pr_err("Secure Data Path service not available\n");
> +			return 0;
> +		}
> +		rc = optee_set_dma_mask(optee, res.result.pa_width);
> +		if (!rc)
> +			pool = tee_protmem_static_pool_alloc(res.result.start,
> +							     res.result.size);
> +		if (IS_ERR(pool))
> +			return PTR_ERR(pool);
> +
> +		rc = tee_device_register_dma_heap(optee->teedev, heap_id, pool);
> +		if (rc)
> +			goto err;
> +	}
> +
> +	return 0;
> +err:
> +	pool->ops->destroy_pool(pool);
> +	return rc;
> +}
> +
>  static int optee_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  {
>  	optee_invoke_fn *invoke_fn;
> @@ -1679,7 +1715,7 @@ static int optee_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  	optee = kzalloc(sizeof(*optee), GFP_KERNEL);
>  	if (!optee) {
>  		rc = -ENOMEM;
> -		goto err_free_pool;
> +		goto err_free_shm_pool;
>  	}
>  
>  	optee->ops = &optee_ops;
> @@ -1752,6 +1788,10 @@ static int optee_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  		pr_info("Asynchronous notifications enabled\n");
>  	}
>  
> +	rc = optee_protmem_pool_init(optee);

Here we should do a Kconfig check for CONFIG_DMABUF_HEAPS so that we
don't proceed any further with initialization.

Rest looks good to me.

-Sumit

> +	if (rc)
> +		goto err_notif_uninit;
> +
>  	/*
>  	 * Ensure that there are no pre-existing shm objects before enabling
>  	 * the shm cache so that there's no chance of receiving an invalid
> @@ -1787,6 +1827,7 @@ static int optee_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  		optee_disable_shm_cache(optee);
>  	optee_smc_notif_uninit_irq(optee);
>  	optee_unregister_devices();
> +	tee_device_unregister_all_dma_heaps(optee->teedev);
>  err_notif_uninit:
>  	optee_notif_uninit(optee);
>  err_close_ctx:
> @@ -1803,7 +1844,7 @@ static int optee_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  	tee_device_unregister(optee->teedev);
>  err_free_optee:
>  	kfree(optee);
> -err_free_pool:
> +err_free_shm_pool:
>  	tee_shm_pool_free(pool);
>  	if (memremaped_shm)
>  		memunmap(memremaped_shm);
> -- 
> 2.43.0
> 


  reply	other threads:[~2025-05-26  7:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-05-20 15:16 [PATCH v9 0/9] TEE subsystem for protected dma-buf allocations Jens Wiklander
2025-05-20 15:16 ` [PATCH v9 1/9] optee: sync secure world ABI headers Jens Wiklander
2025-05-23  9:00   ` Sumit Garg
2025-05-20 15:16 ` [PATCH v9 2/9] dma-buf: dma-heap: export declared functions Jens Wiklander
2025-05-21  7:13   ` Christian König
2025-05-22  6:56     ` Jens Wiklander
2025-05-22 11:52       ` Christian König
2025-05-22 12:36         ` Jens Wiklander
2025-05-20 15:16 ` [PATCH v9 3/9] tee: implement protected DMA-heap Jens Wiklander
2025-05-23 13:03   ` Sumit Garg
2025-05-26  7:11     ` Jens Wiklander
2025-05-30  2:13   ` Amirreza Zarrabi
2025-06-02 16:00     ` Jens Wiklander
2025-05-20 15:16 ` [PATCH v9 4/9] tee: refactor params_from_user() Jens Wiklander
2025-05-20 15:16 ` [PATCH v9 5/9] tee: new ioctl to a register tee_shm from a dmabuf file descriptor Jens Wiklander
2025-05-23 13:31   ` Sumit Garg
2025-05-26  8:34     ` Jens Wiklander
2025-05-20 15:16 ` [PATCH v9 6/9] tee: add tee_shm_alloc_dma_mem() Jens Wiklander
2025-05-22 16:49   ` kernel test robot
2025-05-26  7:22   ` Sumit Garg
2025-05-26  9:21     ` Jens Wiklander
2025-05-26  9:33       ` Sumit Garg
2025-05-27 14:21         ` Jens Wiklander
2025-05-20 15:16 ` [PATCH v9 7/9] optee: support protected memory allocation Jens Wiklander
2025-05-26  7:33   ` Sumit Garg [this message]
2025-05-27 14:32     ` Jens Wiklander
2025-05-20 15:16 ` [PATCH v9 8/9] optee: FF-A: dynamic " Jens Wiklander
2025-05-26  8:09   ` Sumit Garg
2025-05-27 15:07     ` Jens Wiklander
2025-05-20 15:16 ` [PATCH v9 9/9] optee: smc abi: " Jens Wiklander
2025-05-26  8:13   ` Sumit Garg
2025-05-27 14:43     ` Jens Wiklander

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=aDQZN-frPnr1_N5I@sumit-X1 \
    --to=sumit.garg@kernel.org \
    --cc=Brian.Starkey@arm.com \
    --cc=angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com \
    --cc=azarrabi@qti.qualcomm.com \
    --cc=benjamin.gaignard@collabora.com \
    --cc=christian.koenig@amd.com \
    --cc=daniel@fooishbar.org \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=jens.wiklander@linaro.org \
    --cc=jstultz@google.com \
    --cc=linaro-mm-sig@lists.linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-media@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=matthias.bgg@gmail.com \
    --cc=olivier.masse@nxp.com \
    --cc=op-tee@lists.trustedfirmware.org \
    --cc=rouven.czerwinski@linaro.org \
    --cc=simona.vetter@ffwll.ch \
    --cc=sumit.semwal@linaro.org \
    --cc=thierry.reding@gmail.com \
    --cc=tjmercier@google.com \
    --cc=yong.wu@mediatek.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).