public inbox for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sumit Garg <sumit.garg@kernel.org>
To: Jens Wiklander <jens.wiklander@linaro.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-media@vger.kernel.org,
	dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, linaro-mm-sig@lists.linaro.org,
	op-tee@lists.trustedfirmware.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	"Olivier Masse" <olivier.masse@nxp.com>,
	"Thierry Reding" <thierry.reding@gmail.com>,
	"Yong Wu" <yong.wu@mediatek.com>,
	"Sumit Semwal" <sumit.semwal@linaro.org>,
	"Benjamin Gaignard" <benjamin.gaignard@collabora.com>,
	"Brian Starkey" <Brian.Starkey@arm.com>,
	"John Stultz" <jstultz@google.com>,
	"T . J . Mercier" <tjmercier@google.com>,
	"Christian König" <christian.koenig@amd.com>,
	"Matthias Brugger" <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>,
	"AngeloGioacchino Del Regno"
	<angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com>,
	azarrabi@qti.qualcomm.com,
	"Simona Vetter" <simona.vetter@ffwll.ch>,
	"Daniel Stone" <daniel@fooishbar.org>,
	"Rouven Czerwinski" <rouven.czerwinski@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 9/9] optee: smc abi: dynamic protected memory allocation
Date: Mon, 26 May 2025 13:43:41 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <aDQitSd27Z4qC0xT@sumit-X1> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250520152436.474778-10-jens.wiklander@linaro.org>

On Tue, May 20, 2025 at 05:16:52PM +0200, Jens Wiklander wrote:
> Add support in the OP-TEE backend driver for dynamic protected memory
> allocation using the SMC ABI.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jens Wiklander <jens.wiklander@linaro.org>
> ---
>  drivers/tee/optee/smc_abi.c | 102 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
>  1 file changed, 85 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/tee/optee/smc_abi.c b/drivers/tee/optee/smc_abi.c
> index f3cae8243785..6b3fbe7f0909 100644
> --- a/drivers/tee/optee/smc_abi.c
> +++ b/drivers/tee/optee/smc_abi.c
> @@ -965,6 +965,70 @@ static int optee_smc_do_call_with_arg(struct tee_context *ctx,
>  	return rc;
>  }
>  
> +static int optee_smc_lend_protmem(struct optee *optee, struct tee_shm *protmem,
> +				  u16 *end_points, unsigned int ep_count,
> +				  u32 use_case)
> +{
> +	struct optee_shm_arg_entry *entry;
> +	struct optee_msg_arg *msg_arg;
> +	struct tee_shm *shm;
> +	u_int offs;
> +	int rc;
> +
> +	msg_arg = optee_get_msg_arg(optee->ctx, 2, &entry, &shm, &offs);
> +	if (IS_ERR(msg_arg))
> +		return PTR_ERR(msg_arg);
> +
> +	msg_arg->cmd = OPTEE_MSG_CMD_LEND_PROTMEM;
> +	msg_arg->params[0].attr = OPTEE_MSG_ATTR_TYPE_VALUE_INPUT;
> +	msg_arg->params[0].u.value.a = use_case;
> +	msg_arg->params[1].attr = OPTEE_MSG_ATTR_TYPE_TMEM_INPUT;
> +	msg_arg->params[1].u.tmem.buf_ptr = protmem->paddr;
> +	msg_arg->params[1].u.tmem.size = protmem->size;
> +	msg_arg->params[1].u.tmem.shm_ref = (u_long)protmem;
> +
> +	rc = optee->ops->do_call_with_arg(optee->ctx, shm, offs, false);
> +	if (rc)
> +		goto out;
> +	if (msg_arg->ret != TEEC_SUCCESS) {
> +		rc = -EINVAL;
> +		goto out;
> +	}
> +	protmem->sec_world_id = (u_long)protmem;
> +
> +out:
> +	optee_free_msg_arg(optee->ctx, entry, offs);
> +	return rc;
> +}
> +
> +static int optee_smc_reclaim_protmem(struct optee *optee,
> +				     struct tee_shm *protmem)
> +{
> +	struct optee_shm_arg_entry *entry;
> +	struct optee_msg_arg *msg_arg;
> +	struct tee_shm *shm;
> +	u_int offs;
> +	int rc;
> +
> +	msg_arg = optee_get_msg_arg(optee->ctx, 1, &entry, &shm, &offs);
> +	if (IS_ERR(msg_arg))
> +		return PTR_ERR(msg_arg);
> +
> +	msg_arg->cmd = OPTEE_MSG_CMD_RECLAIM_PROTMEM;
> +	msg_arg->params[0].attr = OPTEE_MSG_ATTR_TYPE_RMEM_INPUT;
> +	msg_arg->params[0].u.rmem.shm_ref = (u_long)protmem;
> +
> +	rc = optee->ops->do_call_with_arg(optee->ctx, shm, offs, false);
> +	if (rc)
> +		goto out;
> +	if (msg_arg->ret != TEEC_SUCCESS)
> +		rc = -EINVAL;
> +
> +out:
> +	optee_free_msg_arg(optee->ctx, entry, offs);
> +	return rc;
> +}
> +
>  /*
>   * 5. Asynchronous notification
>   */
> @@ -1216,6 +1280,8 @@ static const struct optee_ops optee_ops = {
>  	.do_call_with_arg = optee_smc_do_call_with_arg,
>  	.to_msg_param = optee_to_msg_param,
>  	.from_msg_param = optee_from_msg_param,
> +	.lend_protmem = optee_smc_lend_protmem,
> +	.reclaim_protmem = optee_smc_reclaim_protmem,
>  };
>  
>  static int enable_async_notif(optee_invoke_fn *invoke_fn)
> @@ -1586,11 +1652,14 @@ static inline int optee_load_fw(struct platform_device *pdev,
>  
>  static int optee_protmem_pool_init(struct optee *optee)
>  {
> +	bool protm = optee->smc.sec_caps & OPTEE_SMC_SEC_CAP_PROTMEM;
> +	bool dyn_protm = optee->smc.sec_caps &
> +			 OPTEE_SMC_SEC_CAP_DYNAMIC_PROTMEM;
>  	enum tee_dma_heap_id heap_id = TEE_DMA_HEAP_SECURE_VIDEO_PLAY;
> -	struct tee_protmem_pool *pool;
> -	int rc;
> +	struct tee_protmem_pool *pool = ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
> +	int rc = -EINVAL;
>  
> -	if (optee->smc.sec_caps & OPTEE_SMC_SEC_CAP_PROTMEM) {
> +	if (protm) {
>  		union {
>  			struct arm_smccc_res smccc;
>  			struct optee_smc_get_protmem_config_result result;
> @@ -1598,26 +1667,26 @@ static int optee_protmem_pool_init(struct optee *optee)
>  
>  		optee->smc.invoke_fn(OPTEE_SMC_GET_PROTMEM_CONFIG, 0, 0, 0, 0,
>  				     0, 0, 0, &res.smccc);
> -		if (res.result.status != OPTEE_SMC_RETURN_OK) {
> -			pr_err("Secure Data Path service not available\n");
> -			return 0;
> -		}
> -		rc = optee_set_dma_mask(optee, res.result.pa_width);
> +		if (res.result.status == OPTEE_SMC_RETURN_OK)
> +			rc = optee_set_dma_mask(optee, res.result.pa_width);

This change should be folded in patch 7/9.

>  		if (!rc)
>  			pool = tee_protmem_static_pool_alloc(res.result.start,
>  							     res.result.size);
> -		if (IS_ERR(pool))
> -			return PTR_ERR(pool);
> +	}
>  
> +	if (dyn_protm && IS_ERR(pool))
> +		pool = optee_protmem_alloc_dyn_pool(optee, heap_id);
> +
> +	if (!IS_ERR(pool)) {
>  		rc = tee_device_register_dma_heap(optee->teedev, heap_id, pool);
>  		if (rc)
> -			goto err;
> +			pool->ops->destroy_pool(pool);
>  	}
>  
> +	if (protm || dyn_protm)
> +		return rc;
> +
>  	return 0;
> -err:
> -	pool->ops->destroy_pool(pool);
> -	return rc;
>  }
>  
>  static int optee_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> @@ -1788,9 +1857,8 @@ static int optee_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  		pr_info("Asynchronous notifications enabled\n");
>  	}
>  
> -	rc = optee_protmem_pool_init(optee);
> -	if (rc)
> -		goto err_notif_uninit;
> +	if (optee_protmem_pool_init(optee))
> +		pr_info("Protected memory service not available\n");

This change can be folded in patch 7/9.

Rest looks good to me.

-Sumit

>  
>  	/*
>  	 * Ensure that there are no pre-existing shm objects before enabling
> -- 
> 2.43.0
> 


  reply	other threads:[~2025-05-26  8:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-05-20 15:16 [PATCH v9 0/9] TEE subsystem for protected dma-buf allocations Jens Wiklander
2025-05-20 15:16 ` [PATCH v9 1/9] optee: sync secure world ABI headers Jens Wiklander
2025-05-23  9:00   ` Sumit Garg
2025-05-20 15:16 ` [PATCH v9 2/9] dma-buf: dma-heap: export declared functions Jens Wiklander
2025-05-21  7:13   ` Christian König
2025-05-22  6:56     ` Jens Wiklander
2025-05-22 11:52       ` Christian König
2025-05-22 12:36         ` Jens Wiklander
2025-05-20 15:16 ` [PATCH v9 3/9] tee: implement protected DMA-heap Jens Wiklander
2025-05-23 13:03   ` Sumit Garg
2025-05-26  7:11     ` Jens Wiklander
2025-05-30  2:13   ` Amirreza Zarrabi
2025-06-02 16:00     ` Jens Wiklander
2025-05-20 15:16 ` [PATCH v9 4/9] tee: refactor params_from_user() Jens Wiklander
2025-05-20 15:16 ` [PATCH v9 5/9] tee: new ioctl to a register tee_shm from a dmabuf file descriptor Jens Wiklander
2025-05-23 13:31   ` Sumit Garg
2025-05-26  8:34     ` Jens Wiklander
2025-05-20 15:16 ` [PATCH v9 6/9] tee: add tee_shm_alloc_dma_mem() Jens Wiklander
2025-05-22 16:49   ` kernel test robot
2025-05-26  7:22   ` Sumit Garg
2025-05-26  9:21     ` Jens Wiklander
2025-05-26  9:33       ` Sumit Garg
2025-05-27 14:21         ` Jens Wiklander
2025-05-20 15:16 ` [PATCH v9 7/9] optee: support protected memory allocation Jens Wiklander
2025-05-26  7:33   ` Sumit Garg
2025-05-27 14:32     ` Jens Wiklander
2025-05-20 15:16 ` [PATCH v9 8/9] optee: FF-A: dynamic " Jens Wiklander
2025-05-26  8:09   ` Sumit Garg
2025-05-27 15:07     ` Jens Wiklander
2025-05-20 15:16 ` [PATCH v9 9/9] optee: smc abi: " Jens Wiklander
2025-05-26  8:13   ` Sumit Garg [this message]
2025-05-27 14:43     ` Jens Wiklander

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=aDQitSd27Z4qC0xT@sumit-X1 \
    --to=sumit.garg@kernel.org \
    --cc=Brian.Starkey@arm.com \
    --cc=angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com \
    --cc=azarrabi@qti.qualcomm.com \
    --cc=benjamin.gaignard@collabora.com \
    --cc=christian.koenig@amd.com \
    --cc=daniel@fooishbar.org \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=jens.wiklander@linaro.org \
    --cc=jstultz@google.com \
    --cc=linaro-mm-sig@lists.linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-media@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=matthias.bgg@gmail.com \
    --cc=olivier.masse@nxp.com \
    --cc=op-tee@lists.trustedfirmware.org \
    --cc=rouven.czerwinski@linaro.org \
    --cc=simona.vetter@ffwll.ch \
    --cc=sumit.semwal@linaro.org \
    --cc=thierry.reding@gmail.com \
    --cc=tjmercier@google.com \
    --cc=yong.wu@mediatek.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox